So who's the leaker?

[CrusaderFrank]

I think your priority is messed up here.

The leaker isn't the problem.

The problem is the court is about to ignore 50 years of precedent to force women to have pregnancies they don't want.

Dred Scott

 

[CrusaderFrank]

ENIGMA cracked it!

Ultra

 

[CrusaderFrank]

View attachment 640101

DC DRAMA: WHO LEAKED? FOUR THEORIES

I'd suspect Ketanji, but she's confused over the idea of a woman

 

[JoeB131]

They'd already voted and Alito was assigned to write the majority opinion.,

quite right. And that's two months for Rapey Kavanaugh or Serena Joy Barrett to have a change of heart and not want to be the monsters who maim thousands of women. Better get them on the record now so it's harder for them to back down. Leak... leak... leak...

Bullshit. Women in the US will always be free to travel anywhere they want to get an abortion.

Why should they have to?

Horse shit, this leak has a much greater potential to get the opposite outcome.

The justices are not bound to their decisions until the final opinion is drafted. With the pressure being put on all of them right now someone very well may cave and change their vote.

Which is probably why Alito leaked it.

It's a human being in the first stages of life. **** you and your "it's not a person" semantic bullshit.

Here's the thing. Zygotes are the first stages of life. but 2/3rds of Zygotes never attack to the uterine wall.

20% of pregnancies end in miscarriages. 2% of pregnancies are ectopic (embryo attaches to the fallopian tube and must be removed. )

Nobody thinks twice about those pregnancies as "lost people".

 

[JoeB131]

I'm less interested in who, and more interested in why.

Neither is important. The important thing is what the effect will be on millions of women, not the hurt feelings of nine overhyped lawyers with an inflated sense of self-importance.

 

[JohnDB]

Abortion itself is the minor issue with Alito's draft decision...

It's because of the logic of the explanation that is causing the most furor.

Because within the decision and it's logic it paves the way for such things as denying homosexual marriage, and other liberal agenda items.

Now the newest justice appointed by Biden....her clerk is likely the culprit. Because Biden hasn't really done much right yet. And I can see his appointee to the court having a massive screw up on day one. (Or at least her clerk)

 

[JoeB131]

Abortion itself is the minor issue with Alito's draft decision...

It's because of the logic of the explanation that is causing the most furor.

Because within the decision and it's logic it paves the way for such things as denying homosexual marriage, and other liberal agenda items.

Now the newest justice appointed by Biden....her clerk is likely the culprit. Because Biden hasn't really done much right yet. And I can see his appointee to the court having a massive screw up on day one. (Or at least her clerk)

It's unlikely the new justice would have been given a draft. The draft was probably circulated so the current nine could write concurring or dissenting opinions.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

There's a very finite # of individuals that could have done this. Whoever it is will be found out, and if it's a clerk with a very promising future in law, they have destroyed themselves completely. They'll have a cult following however.

They're heroes to the entire Demonrat Party. There'll be no consequences

 

[Turtlesoup]

Are pregnant women forbidden to travel either intrastate or interstate?

Back to my example of mormons and their cults---YES.

 

[Ringel05]

Until this leak, supreme court deliberations were kept confidential. It took 235 years for partisanship and dishonesty to completely eliminate that trust.

Are you surprised given the current dysfunctional state of politics in this country?

 

[Orangecat]

Here's the thing. Zygotes are the first stages of life.

First stages of a new, individual human life, that is.

but 2/3rds of Zygotes never attack to the uterine wall.

Like Mexicans attacking the border wall? Lulz.

 

[9thIDdoc]

Most animals aren't human. Our unborn children are.

Then why all this fuss about when what can feel pain? Most animals feel pain; do you think that all animals are human?
"Children" refers to humans that have already been born, so there is no such thing as "unborn children". People do not have a right to change the language to suit their agenda and expect anyone else to agree to the change.

 

[9thIDdoc]

They are human beings so they are most certainly people.

All fetuses are NOT human.

 

[9thIDdoc]

 

[Lesh]

Ginni Thomas.

No one is talking about her texts anymore or recusal for for her husband.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

All fetuses are NOT human.

They are if the mother is human.

 

[Lakhota]

LEAKER: Amy Commie Barrett or Ginni Thomas. Those are my guesses.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Ginni Thomas.

No one is talking about her texts anymore or recusal for for her husband.

Nobody was talking about it the day before this leak either. Clarence isn't responsible for her actions nor is there any reason he should be forced to recuse himself on any case because of her actions.

We're about a century beyond the idea that men must be able to control their women or that they are responsible for the behavior of their women.

 

[toobfreak]

So who's the leaker?​

We will likely never know. Apparently they pass these opinions around to so many people within the SCOTUS that there is no telling who leaked it!

Maybe is was the Russians!

In any sane government, they should have known within the hour who had access to it, who had seen it, and who could have leaked it and nailed it down to one or two people and gotten a confession.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

We will likely never know. Apparently they pass these opinions around to so many people within the SCOTUS that there is no telling who leaked it!

Maybe is was the Russians!

In any sane government, they should have known within the hour who had access to it, who had seen it, and who could have leaked it and nailed it down to one or two people and gotten a confession.

Access to the draft opinions is extremely limited. As such any serious investigation will likely end with the leaker being identified. It may however require warrants on their phones and computers which might be difficult to obtain unless someone can identify a crime or at least a civil violation.

Even if they can't prove it conclusively though odds are they'll have enough evidence to know who it was.

Sooner or later though these types of folks will usually want to "take credit" for what they did.

Even if their legal careers are over they'll be heroes to democrats and celebrated as a hero for doing so.