Maintaining decorum among the SC justices is seemingly becoming more difficult.

[berg80]

The Supreme Court gifted Republicans another partisan political advantage Monday, deviating from its normal procedure by immediately certifying last week’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais and sending it back to the lower court, rather than waiting the usual 32 days under its own rules. The court offered no real explanation for its ruling.

Accelerating the usual timing will make it easier for Louisiana to redraw its House district maps to eliminate at least one of its two majority-Black districts before the midterm elections.

It also added insult to injury, as the Roberts Court has been wildly inconsistent in applying its own principle that federal courts should not intervene in redistricting cases too close to elections. In this case, the court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais came after mail-in voting in the House primary elections were already under way. The new special dispensation for Louisiana came after its Republican governor suspended the House primaries in order to redraw the districts in light of Louisiana v. Callais.

The court’s procedural decision prompted a heated dissent from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who noted the court had made a similar decision only two other times in the least 25 years:

These post-Callais developments have a strong political undercurrent. … Not content to have decided the law, it now takes steps to influence its implementation. The Court’s decision to buck our usual practice … and issue the judgment forthwith is tantamount to an approval of Louisiana’s rush to pause the ongoing election in order to pass a new map.

Roberts Court Tosses GOP One More Midterm Gift

Partisan Hackery Destroying the Voting Rights Act wasn’t enough. The Supreme Court...

talkingpointsmemo.com

On the whole, I think it's remarkable to see the restraint we've seen among the justices given the hyper partisan rulings that are becoming more commonplace. Which is not to say that haven't been deviations from past practices. Sotomayor apologized to Kavanaugh recently for her remarks suggesting he was ignorant of the ramifications of his concurrence on an immigration case due his privileged life. His being one of the least egregious reasons for criticisms of the conservatives on the Court. Not so the gutting of Sec. 2 of the VRA which was atrocious on its face.

For context............

Voting rights groups sue as Louisiana suspends congressional primaries​

Voting rights groups sue as Louisiana suspends congressional primaries

Advocates claim postponing elections in the wake of a landmark Supreme Court ruling creates mass confusion for voters, including tens of thousands who have already cast early or absentee ballots.

courthousenews.com

 

[WEATHER53]

The non thinking wise ass Latina and hoochie DEI Brown feel melodramatic conflict is better than decorum

 

[Meister]

Were they required to give a reason for the ruling?

 

[airplanemechanic]

Were they required to give a reason for the ruling?

Since they are republicans, yes. Democrats, nope. No reason needed.

 

[blackhawk]

It’s funny how people are only upset over partisan rulings when their partisans are not in the majority.

 

[theHawk]

The Supreme Court gifted Republicans another partisan political advantage Monday, deviating from its normal procedure by immediately certifying last week’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais and sending it back to the lower court, rather than waiting the usual 32 days under its own rules. The court offered no real explanation for its ruling.

Accelerating the usual timing will make it easier for Louisiana to redraw its House district maps to eliminate at least one of its two majority-Black districts before the midterm elections.

It also added insult to injury, as the Roberts Court has been wildly inconsistent in applying its own principle that federal courts should not intervene in redistricting cases too close to elections. In this case, the court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais came after mail-in voting in the House primary elections were already under way. The new special dispensation for Louisiana came after its Republican governor suspended the House primaries in order to redraw the districts in light of Louisiana v. Callais.

The court’s procedural decision prompted a heated dissent from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who noted the court had made a similar decision only two other times in the least 25 years:

Roberts Court Tosses GOP One More Midterm Gift

Partisan Hackery Destroying the Voting Rights Act wasn’t enough. The Supreme Court...

talkingpointsmemo.com

On the whole, I think it's remarkable to see the restraint we've seen among the justices given the hyper partisan rulings that are becoming more commonplace. Which is not to say that haven't been deviations from past practices. Sotomayor apologized to Kavanaugh recently for her remarks suggesting he was ignorant of the ramifications of his concurrence on an immigration case due his privileged life. His being one of the least egregious reasons for criticisms of the conservatives on the Court. Not so the gutting of Sec. 2 of the VRA which was atrocious on its face.

For context............

Voting rights groups sue as Louisiana suspends congressional primaries​

Voting rights groups sue as Louisiana suspends congressional primaries

Advocates claim postponing elections in the wake of a landmark Supreme Court ruling creates mass confusion for voters, including tens of thousands who have already cast early or absentee ballots.

courthousenews.com

Remove Kentaji and Sotomayor. The Lesbo needs to go too.

All three are radical leftwing lunatics.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Accelerating the usual timing will make it easier for Louisiana to redraw its House district maps to eliminate at least one of its two majority-Black districts before the midterm elections.

It also added insult to injury, as the Roberts Court has been wildly inconsistent in applying its own principle that federal courts should not intervene in redistricting cases too close to elections.

The Court is dominated by blind partisan Republican hacks and conservative ideologues who have contempt settled, accepted precedent.

 

[WEATHER53]

The Court is dominated by blind partisan Republican hacks and conservative ideologues who have contempt settled, accepted precedent.

Court is dominated by thinkers who follow a thinking protocol which lib loons call “partisan hack”

 

[TheGreatSatan]

When you need a biologist to tell you what a woman is, nobody will take you seriously.

Democrats = perverted freaks

 

[Rawley]

The Supreme Court gifted Republicans another partisan political advantage Monday, deviating from its normal procedure by immediately certifying last week’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais and sending it back to the lower court, rather than waiting the usual 32 days under its own rules. The court offered no real explanation for its ruling.

Accelerating the usual timing will make it easier for Louisiana to redraw its House district maps to eliminate at least one of its two majority-Black districts before the midterm elections.

It also added insult to injury, as the Roberts Court has been wildly inconsistent in applying its own principle that federal courts should not intervene in redistricting cases too close to elections. In this case, the court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais came after mail-in voting in the House primary elections were already under way. The new special dispensation for Louisiana came after its Republican governor suspended the House primaries in order to redraw the districts in light of Louisiana v. Callais.

The court’s procedural decision prompted a heated dissent from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who noted the court had made a similar decision only two other times in the least 25 years:

Roberts Court Tosses GOP One More Midterm Gift

Partisan Hackery Destroying the Voting Rights Act wasn’t enough. The Supreme Court...

talkingpointsmemo.com

On the whole, I think it's remarkable to see the restraint we've seen among the justices given the hyper partisan rulings that are becoming more commonplace. Which is not to say that haven't been deviations from past practices. Sotomayor apologized to Kavanaugh recently for her remarks suggesting he was ignorant of the ramifications of his concurrence on an immigration case due his privileged life. His being one of the least egregious reasons for criticisms of the conservatives on the Court. Not so the gutting of Sec. 2 of the VRA which was atrocious on its face.

For context............

Voting rights groups sue as Louisiana suspends congressional primaries​

Voting rights groups sue as Louisiana suspends congressional primaries

Advocates claim postponing elections in the wake of a landmark Supreme Court ruling creates mass confusion for voters, including tens of thousands who have already cast early or absentee ballots.

courthousenews.com

Hmmm. Didn't seem to bother you guys when VA passed their first part of their Constitutional Amendment after more than a million VIA voters had already voted.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Since they are republicans, yes. Democrats, nope. No reason needed.

Demscum are unreasonable

 

[struth]

The Supreme Court gifted Republicans another partisan political advantage Monday, deviating from its normal procedure by immediately certifying last week’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais and sending it back to the lower court, rather than waiting the usual 32 days under its own rules. The court offered no real explanation for its ruling.

Accelerating the usual timing will make it easier for Louisiana to redraw its House district maps to eliminate at least one of its two majority-Black districts before the midterm elections.

It also added insult to injury, as the Roberts Court has been wildly inconsistent in applying its own principle that federal courts should not intervene in redistricting cases too close to elections. In this case, the court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais came after mail-in voting in the House primary elections were already under way. The new special dispensation for Louisiana came after its Republican governor suspended the House primaries in order to redraw the districts in light of Louisiana v. Callais.

The court’s procedural decision prompted a heated dissent from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who noted the court had made a similar decision only two other times in the least 25 years:

Roberts Court Tosses GOP One More Midterm Gift

Partisan Hackery Destroying the Voting Rights Act wasn’t enough. The Supreme Court...

talkingpointsmemo.com

On the whole, I think it's remarkable to see the restraint we've seen among the justices given the hyper partisan rulings that are becoming more commonplace. Which is not to say that haven't been deviations from past practices. Sotomayor apologized to Kavanaugh recently for her remarks suggesting he was ignorant of the ramifications of his concurrence on an immigration case due his privileged life. His being one of the least egregious reasons for criticisms of the conservatives on the Court. Not so the gutting of Sec. 2 of the VRA which was atrocious on its face.

For context............

Voting rights groups sue as Louisiana suspends congressional primaries​

Voting rights groups sue as Louisiana suspends congressional primaries

Advocates claim postponing elections in the wake of a landmark Supreme Court ruling creates mass confusion for voters, including tens of thousands who have already cast early or absentee ballots.

courthousenews.com

Pretty simple....they don't want LA to use an illegal map in the election

Why would you want them to use an illegal map?

 

[ColonelAngus]

The lefty justices think you battle RACISM WITH RACISM.

NOPE.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Pretty simple....they don't want LA to use an illegal map in the election

Why would you want them to use an illegal map?

Because he's a demscum, illegal is their normal

 

[struth]

The Supreme Court gifted Republicans another partisan political advantage Monday, deviating from its normal procedure by immediately certifying last week’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais and sending it back to the lower court, rather than waiting the usual 32 days under its own rules. The court offered no real explanation for its ruling.

Accelerating the usual timing will make it easier for Louisiana to redraw its House district maps to eliminate at least one of its two majority-Black districts before the midterm elections.

It also added insult to injury, as the Roberts Court has been wildly inconsistent in applying its own principle that federal courts should not intervene in redistricting cases too close to elections. In this case, the court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais came after mail-in voting in the House primary elections were already under way. The new special dispensation for Louisiana came after its Republican governor suspended the House primaries in order to redraw the districts in light of Louisiana v. Callais.

The court’s procedural decision prompted a heated dissent from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who noted the court had made a similar decision only two other times in the least 25 years:

Roberts Court Tosses GOP One More Midterm Gift

Partisan Hackery Destroying the Voting Rights Act wasn’t enough. The Supreme Court...

talkingpointsmemo.com

On the whole, I think it's remarkable to see the restraint we've seen among the justices given the hyper partisan rulings that are becoming more commonplace. Which is not to say that haven't been deviations from past practices. Sotomayor apologized to Kavanaugh recently for her remarks suggesting he was ignorant of the ramifications of his concurrence on an immigration case due his privileged life. His being one of the least egregious reasons for criticisms of the conservatives on the Court. Not so the gutting of Sec. 2 of the VRA which was atrocious on its face.

For context............

Voting rights groups sue as Louisiana suspends congressional primaries​

Voting rights groups sue as Louisiana suspends congressional primaries

Advocates claim postponing elections in the wake of a landmark Supreme Court ruling creates mass confusion for voters, including tens of thousands who have already cast early or absentee ballots.

courthousenews.com

Did you not read the opinion? They clearly offer an explanation:

The dissent in this suit levels charges that cannot go unanswered. The dissent would require that the 2026 congressional elections in Louisiana be held under a map thathas been held to be unconstitutional.*

Why do you and Justice Brown want LA to use an illegal map?

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Judge Thomas really triggers the Dirty Klanocrats lol

 

[Lockback]

The Supreme Court gifted Republicans another partisan political advantage Monday, deviating from its normal procedure by immediately certifying last week’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais and sending it back to the lower court, rather than waiting the usual 32 days under its own rules. The court offered no real explanation for its ruling.

Accelerating the usual timing will make it easier for Louisiana to redraw its House district maps to eliminate at least one of its two majority-Black districts before the midterm elections.

It also added insult to injury, as the Roberts Court has been wildly inconsistent in applying its own principle that federal courts should not intervene in redistricting cases too close to elections. In this case, the court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais came after mail-in voting in the House primary elections were already under way. The new special dispensation for Louisiana came after its Republican governor suspended the House primaries in order to redraw the districts in light of Louisiana v. Callais.

The court’s procedural decision prompted a heated dissent from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who noted the court had made a similar decision only two other times in the least 25 years:

Roberts Court Tosses GOP One More Midterm Gift

Partisan Hackery Destroying the Voting Rights Act wasn’t enough. The Supreme Court...

talkingpointsmemo.com

On the whole, I think it's remarkable to see the restraint we've seen among the justices given the hyper partisan rulings that are becoming more commonplace. Which is not to say that haven't been deviations from past practices. Sotomayor apologized to Kavanaugh recently for her remarks suggesting he was ignorant of the ramifications of his concurrence on an immigration case due his privileged life. His being one of the least egregious reasons for criticisms of the conservatives on the Court. Not so the gutting of Sec. 2 of the VRA which was atrocious on its face.

For context............

Voting rights groups sue as Louisiana suspends congressional primaries​

Voting rights groups sue as Louisiana suspends congressional primaries

Advocates claim postponing elections in the wake of a landmark Supreme Court ruling creates mass confusion for voters, including tens of thousands who have already cast early or absentee ballots.

courthousenews.com

Why don't you educate yourself with Mollie Hemingway's book "Alito" and get back to us instead of vomiting up some uninformed left wing hackery?

 

[Lockback]

Judge Thomas really triggers the Dirty Klanocrats lol

View attachment 1252715

Clarence Thomas is the DOOD.

 

[Doc7505]

The Court is dominated by blind partisan Republican hacks and conservative ideologues who have contempt settled, accepted precedent.

<~~~~~~~~~~>
Except for the fact that Democrat appointed Justices cannot define their feminism or vote freely without touting their Democrat Socialist Leftist ideologies.

 

[JusticeHammer]

The Court is dominated by blind partisan Republican hacks and conservative ideologues who have contempt settled, accepted precedent.

And are right. Demscum are stupid