Maintaining decorum among the SC justices is seemingly becoming more difficult.

[WEATHER53]

Did you not read the opinion? They clearly offer an explanation:

The dissent in this suit levels charges that cannot go unanswered. The dissent would require that the 2026 congressional elections in Louisiana be held under a map thathas been held to be unconstitutional.*

Why do you and Justice Brown want LA to use an illegal map?

Cheat to win is the play by play

 

[Lockback]

The Court is dominated by blind partisan Republican hacks and conservative ideologues who have contempt settled, accepted precedent.

Oh, you mean justices that actually apply the Constitution instead of pulling fake stuff out of their asses?

 

[WEATHER53]

Demscum are unreasonable

Reason includes though process and they don’t have any

 

[berg80]

Were they required to give a reason for the ruling?

Not sure. But since it deviated from normal practices an explanation was called for it not required.

But heck, everyone understands why they did it. The Repubs on the bench wanted to fast track anything that will help R's in the midterms.

 

[berg80]

The non thinking wise ass Latina and hoochie DEI Brown feel melodramatic conflict is better than decorum

Obviously, the conservatives deserved to be called out. They aren't even attempting to hide their hackery any longer.

It also added insult to injury, as the Roberts Court has been wildly inconsistent in applying its own principle that federal courts should not intervene in redistricting cases too close to elections.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Not sure. But since it deviated from normal practices an explanation was called for it not required.

But heck, everyone understands why they did it. The Repubs on the bench wanted to fast track anything that will help R's in the midterms.

Demscum do it all the time. Sucks to know you suck doesn't it?

 

[Clipper]

The Supreme Court gifted Republicans another partisan political advantage Monday, deviating from its normal procedure by immediately certifying last week’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais and sending it back to the lower court, rather than waiting the usual 32 days under its own rules. The court offered no real explanation for its ruling.

Accelerating the usual timing will make it easier for Louisiana to redraw its House district maps to eliminate at least one of its two majority-Black districts before the midterm elections.

It also added insult to injury, as the Roberts Court has been wildly inconsistent in applying its own principle that federal courts should not intervene in redistricting cases too close to elections. In this case, the court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais came after mail-in voting in the House primary elections were already under way. The new special dispensation for Louisiana came after its Republican governor suspended the House primaries in order to redraw the districts in light of Louisiana v. Callais.

The court’s procedural decision prompted a heated dissent from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who noted the court had made a similar decision only two other times in the least 25 years:

Roberts Court Tosses GOP One More Midterm Gift

Partisan Hackery Destroying the Voting Rights Act wasn’t enough. The Supreme Court...

talkingpointsmemo.com

On the whole, I think it's remarkable to see the restraint we've seen among the justices given the hyper partisan rulings that are becoming more commonplace. Which is not to say that haven't been deviations from past practices. Sotomayor apologized to Kavanaugh recently for her remarks suggesting he was ignorant of the ramifications of his concurrence on an immigration case due his privileged life. His being one of the least egregious reasons for criticisms of the conservatives on the Court. Not so the gutting of Sec. 2 of the VRA which was atrocious on its face.

For context............

Voting rights groups sue as Louisiana suspends congressional primaries​

Voting rights groups sue as Louisiana suspends congressional primaries

Advocates claim postponing elections in the wake of a landmark Supreme Court ruling creates mass confusion for voters, including tens of thousands who have already cast early or absentee ballots.

courthousenews.com

The MAGA majority on that court is going to do everything they can to ensure that the Trump Party keeps control of the W.H & Congress. Their decision on the VRA should be no surpise to anyone, considering who & what they are. Conservative politicians in a black robe. They're about as impartial as the right wing that they represent & who annointed them to that court.

 

[j-mac]

The Supreme Court gifted Republicans another partisan political advantage Monday, deviating from its normal procedure by immediately certifying last week’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais and sending it back to the lower court, rather than waiting the usual 32 days under its own rules. The court offered no real explanation for its ruling.

Accelerating the usual timing will make it easier for Louisiana to redraw its House district maps to eliminate at least one of its two majority-Black districts before the midterm elections.

It also added insult to injury, as the Roberts Court has been wildly inconsistent in applying its own principle that federal courts should not intervene in redistricting cases too close to elections. In this case, the court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais came after mail-in voting in the House primary elections were already under way. The new special dispensation for Louisiana came after its Republican governor suspended the House primaries in order to redraw the districts in light of Louisiana v. Callais.

The court’s procedural decision prompted a heated dissent from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who noted the court had made a similar decision only two other times in the least 25 years:

Roberts Court Tosses GOP One More Midterm Gift

Partisan Hackery Destroying the Voting Rights Act wasn’t enough. The Supreme Court...

talkingpointsmemo.com

On the whole, I think it's remarkable to see the restraint we've seen among the justices given the hyper partisan rulings that are becoming more commonplace. Which is not to say that haven't been deviations from past practices. Sotomayor apologized to Kavanaugh recently for her remarks suggesting he was ignorant of the ramifications of his concurrence on an immigration case due his privileged life. His being one of the least egregious reasons for criticisms of the conservatives on the Court. Not so the gutting of Sec. 2 of the VRA which was atrocious on its face.

For context............

Voting rights groups sue as Louisiana suspends congressional primaries​

Voting rights groups sue as Louisiana suspends congressional primaries

Advocates claim postponing elections in the wake of a landmark Supreme Court ruling creates mass confusion for voters, including tens of thousands who have already cast early or absentee ballots.

courthousenews.com

More whining from the left….They love them some SCOTUS when it rules in their favor…

 

[Independent thinker]

The Supreme Court gifted Republicans another partisan political advantage Monday, deviating from its normal procedure by immediately certifying last week’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais and sending it back to the lower court, rather than waiting the usual 32 days under its own rules. The court offered no real explanation for its ruling.

Accelerating the usual timing will make it easier for Louisiana to redraw its House district maps to eliminate at least one of its two majority-Black districts before the midterm elections.

It also added insult to injury, as the Roberts Court has been wildly inconsistent in applying its own principle that federal courts should not intervene in redistricting cases too close to elections. In this case, the court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais came after mail-in voting in the House primary elections were already under way. The new special dispensation for Louisiana came after its Republican governor suspended the House primaries in order to redraw the districts in light of Louisiana v. Callais.

The court’s procedural decision prompted a heated dissent from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who noted the court had made a similar decision only two other times in the least 25 years:

Roberts Court Tosses GOP One More Midterm Gift

Partisan Hackery Destroying the Voting Rights Act wasn’t enough. The Supreme Court...

talkingpointsmemo.com

On the whole, I think it's remarkable to see the restraint we've seen among the justices given the hyper partisan rulings that are becoming more commonplace. Which is not to say that haven't been deviations from past practices. Sotomayor apologized to Kavanaugh recently for her remarks suggesting he was ignorant of the ramifications of his concurrence on an immigration case due his privileged life. His being one of the least egregious reasons for criticisms of the conservatives on the Court. Not so the gutting of Sec. 2 of the VRA which was atrocious on its face.

For context............

Voting rights groups sue as Louisiana suspends congressional primaries​

Voting rights groups sue as Louisiana suspends congressional primaries

Advocates claim postponing elections in the wake of a landmark Supreme Court ruling creates mass confusion for voters, including tens of thousands who have already cast early or absentee ballots.

courthousenews.com

It's becoming more difficult since Jackson made it on the court. Even her very own liberal justices vote against her. That's how radical she is.