- Thread starter
- #81
11. A caller to radio host Dennis Prager asked, well…why didn't the Bible simply outlaw slavery?
Prager answered within the context of the times:
To blanket outlaw slavery all at once would be the equivalent of telling everyone, today, to give up all of their possessions.
Since the basis of Judeo-Christian faith is free will……people would simply ignore the restriction.
There would be no sense in the outright ban.
What the Bible does, is gradually mitigate the institution that had been going on since time immemorial.
And the Founders, also, eschewed an outright ban because there would not have been a United States had they done otherwise.
The Founders who wanted to set the stage for the abolition of slavery came up with whata might be seen as a similar compromise involving the issue of apportionment.
"The southern colonies that favored slavery wanted all residents of their states, slave and free, counted equally when it came to deciding how many seats they were going to receive in Congress. Some of the northern colonies, who mostly had few slaves and thus nothing to lose didn’t want slave residents counted at all.
The Founder’s compromise was to count each slave as 3/5 of a man for the purposes of apportionment, and when that passed after a great deal more debate and lobbying, legislators from the slave states were permanently limited to a minority. With that one stroke, the state was set for slavery’s eventual demise, and the proof of how effective it was came in 1804, when the slave states were powerless to stop Congress from outlawing the importation of slaves to the new nation.
The stage was set, even if it took 70 years and a bloody war."
Big Journalism Articles - Breitbart
Prager answered within the context of the times:
To blanket outlaw slavery all at once would be the equivalent of telling everyone, today, to give up all of their possessions.
Since the basis of Judeo-Christian faith is free will……people would simply ignore the restriction.
There would be no sense in the outright ban.
What the Bible does, is gradually mitigate the institution that had been going on since time immemorial.
And the Founders, also, eschewed an outright ban because there would not have been a United States had they done otherwise.
The Founders who wanted to set the stage for the abolition of slavery came up with whata might be seen as a similar compromise involving the issue of apportionment.
"The southern colonies that favored slavery wanted all residents of their states, slave and free, counted equally when it came to deciding how many seats they were going to receive in Congress. Some of the northern colonies, who mostly had few slaves and thus nothing to lose didn’t want slave residents counted at all.
The Founder’s compromise was to count each slave as 3/5 of a man for the purposes of apportionment, and when that passed after a great deal more debate and lobbying, legislators from the slave states were permanently limited to a minority. With that one stroke, the state was set for slavery’s eventual demise, and the proof of how effective it was came in 1804, when the slave states were powerless to stop Congress from outlawing the importation of slaves to the new nation.
The stage was set, even if it took 70 years and a bloody war."
Big Journalism Articles - Breitbart