NFBW221122-
#5,743 So the serious question for you
beagle9 and
CarsomyrPlusSix ding , what entity is it that assumes autonomy over her body?
beagle9221122-
#5,741 beagle9 Prior to [egg fertilization] I'd say yes of course she does, [have autonomy over her own body]
ding 221123-
#5,745 ding “That’s up to the legislators to decide.”
Cplus6221123-
#5,746 CarsomyrPlusSix No one, you ******* retard. The kid's body isn't her body, so she doesn't own the kid, she can't kill the kid. "Autonomy" is irrelevant.
NFBW: A pregnant woman is committing no crime or harm to another person when one of her eggs becomes fertilized and she decides to prevent continued development. Therefore when she uses the autonomy over her own body to choose to terminate her own pregnancy she continues to not commit a crime or harm to another person.
However we see
ding insisting that federal lawnakers and/ or legislators in states where an anti-abortion electorate of mostly white Christian voters are in control of state government affairs, are the association or agency that assumes or must assume autonomy over a woman’s body when her body begins to oxygenate and nourish one of her eggs that has become fertilized.
Out of the blue
ding insists any abortion minded pregnant woman is committing harm to another person and must be dealt with as if she is committing a crime against the fertilized egg being oxygenated and nourished by her own body, in such a way that her autonomy over her own body must be withdrawn temporarily by the government.
ding220512-
#309 ding That the fertilized egg is a human being. And not just any human being but one that has never existed before and will never exist again.
Another abortion foe
CarsomyrPlusSix chimes in insisting no one, as in no human agency, person, entity, individual or government institution has authority to dismiss the a woman’s natural law autonomy but she cannot interfere in the natural law autonomy of a newly fertilized egg. We have a stalemate with no remedy.
This poster
CarsomyrPlusSix relies on absurdity in his arguments such as the above idea that no existing human entity assumes autonomy over a woman when she unexpectedly and unplanned ends up with a fertilized egg moving into her uterus as a natural biological reproductive function that only happens as part of a woman’s body.
If no human agency has autonomy over a pregnant woman’s body then what does have authority to tell her no - you cannot terminate your pregnancy by legal and safe medical procedures, then what can?
Perhaps only
beagle9 is right without saying it exactly The ONLY agency that had autonomy over a human woman before during and after pregnancy is a supernatural agency such as God who communicates through Representative government on earth such as found in Catholicism.
In which case
ding is wrong to violate the constitutional concept of separation of church and state. And
CarsomyrPlusSix has no standing to place a limit on the autonomy of God over all human beings. And
ChemEngineer has not weighed in as if yet.
END2211230902
