Leo123
Diamond Member
- Aug 26, 2017
- 31,629
- 24,452
- 2,915
LOL, that's where all this shit started!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL, that's where all this shit started!!
Having nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that it’s neither the role nor responsibility of the state to dictate to citizens whether to have a child or not.What’s even more odd is that you don’t realize that these are rare cases
No, Jesus said He is the ONLY way to G-d.My bride, Precious Flower, ladylike as she so reliably is....will state demurely to all who are reckless enough to ask her about abortion: "If you don't have a uterus...shut the f*ck up."
I note also that America needs a bunch of white men legislators ....big government.....ruling on what a woman and her uterus can be up to.
Is there a disconnect there?
I get it that Catholics are really into this "No Abortion"-thingy.
I get it.
Really I do.
And I say to my Catholic friends.....make "No Abortions" a Catholic thingy.
And let the rest of the world and the rest of the world's religions.....do it their way.
The Catholic way. The Jesus way. Ain't the only way.
There are many roads to Salvation....and a partnership with a God.
IMHO
And compelling that woman through force of law to give birth against her will is the ‘solution’ – that’s authoritarian idiocy.woman goes out gets drunk, has sex with some random dude, finds out she is knocked up...solution...kill a beautiful innocent child....makes sense to any sicko out there
And far Left whackjobs like you would love to overturn all criminal and penal laws.And compelling that woman through force of law to give birth against her will is the ‘solution’ – that’s authoritarian idiocy.
If one believes abortion is immoral and wrong then find a way to end the practice that doesn’t involve increasing the size and authority of government at the expense of individual liberty.
Nobody is banning abortion, feckless. I have already proposed teaching morals to kids so they don't grow up to be irresponsible adults ruining their lives, bodies and their lives and the lives of developing human beings.Having nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that it’s neither the role nor responsibility of the state to dictate to citizens whether to have a child or not.
Again, the issue is bad faith, dishonest efforts to conflate the issue of abortion with the authority of the state to interfere in personal, private decisions – one having nothing to do with the other.
‘Banning’ abortion is lawless government excess and overreach and should be aggressively opposed regardless one’s position on abortion.
BULLSHIT! Just as I said, there are 3 entities involved in abortion.Your whole post is all about YOU. What YOU think and what YOU believe. You live YOUR life the way YOU see fit, and go fuck yourself on the rights of others to believe differently.
There is no "person attempting to be born". There is only the woman and her doctor. Stop ascribing thoughts, abilities and rights to a blob of cells. You give those cells more credit for thoughtful consideration of the situation than you give to the women who are being forced to make these decisions.
This elevation of dividing cells to "personhood" is both biologically, ethically and morally wrongheaded and dangerous.
IF YOU BELIEVE ABORTION IS WRONG DON'T HAVE ONE. YOUR OPINION ON OTHER PEOPLE'S PREGNANCIES HAS NO VALIDITY WHATSOEVER.
Whatever this goofball picture is supposed to represent, it is ALL decent people who oppose the murderous act of abortion
FALSE! It is not a matter of controlling a woman's body. It is a matter of controlling the body and life of the person being born, and saving them from the murderous trashbags who would try to kill them.Wrong. You’re powerless to stop people from controlling their own bodies. Futile.
About 1/3 of women will have an abortion. Likely your mom, sister, wife, or daughter had one. . Suck it.
FALSE! It is not a matter of controlling a woman's body. It is a matter of controlling the body and life of the person being born, and saving them from the murderous trashbags who would try to kill them.
The OP refers to the MORAL right, not legal capabilities.Women do have the right to choose. They can go to a more enlightened blue state and have it legally done or not. If they live in a Muslim country like Saudi Arabia, iran or a red state they simply need to travel to a blue state...although that could be difficult for lower income women.
And THAT is the point at which the women DOES have a right to choose.If a woman doesn't want another body inside her there's ways to prevent it
Absolutely they should not have a choice, because once they have a LIFE inside of them, that person's LIFE has rank over the woman's convenience. If the women want to have a choice, it is when they have (or don't have) sex, that is when they have their "choice", or to have that sex protected or unprotected. THEN, not when they later have a living person inside them.Make no mistake ladies
Republicans think you should NOT Have a choice in this matter.
There ya go folks.Absoultely they should not have a choice, because once they have a LIFE inside of them, that person's LIFE has rank over the woman's convenience. If the women want to have a choice, it is when they have (or don't have) sex, that is when they have their "choice", or to have that sex protected or unprotected. THEN, not when they later have a living person inside them.
Make no mistake ladies.
There ya go folks.
That’s the voice of the GOP.
No choice. Ever. Anywhere
FALSE! analogy. I did not make anybody be homeless or starving, but the woman DID make there be a living person inside of her. (which she could have taken action to prevent that)Whoever gets access to your fridge should also be dependent on who needs it more. If you just ate and a homeless man is starving then he should have more of a right to your own fridge than you do.
The fetus does not have a "choice" - looks like the GOP is speaking up where they cannot speak for themselves.There ya go folks.
That’s the voice of the GOP.
No choice. Ever. Anywhere
Pay attention to this creep folks.The fetus does not have a "choice" - looks like the GOP is speaking up where they cannot speak for themselves.
The choice of the fetus overrules the choice of the pregnant woman.
There ya go folks. That is indeed the voice of the GOP.
I had to think this one over for quite a while. In fact, I debated it in my mind for about a month before deciding on a policy. Finally, I am seeing this a bit more complex than most people (especially Democrats) are seeing it.
Florida Congresswoman, Debbie Wasserman Shultz, has said that abortion is a matter between a woman and her doctor. FALSE! I don't mean to pick on Debbie Wasserman Shultz, because there are thousands of people (mostly Democrats) who say the same thing. The fact is, abortion is a matter between 3 entities. The woman, her doctor, and the person attempting to be born.
Who has the choice between birth and abortion, should be determined by who has the most at stake. For the doctor, it's a paycheck. For the expectant woman, it is a matter of convenience, while for the developing baby, it is a matter of life and death. Bases on that, it is the fetus who should have the right to choose, no one else.
Those who support abortion, under the most liberal circumstances, should think about this. What if some months before you were born, your mother decided to abort YOU. Can you say now that you are in favor of that abortion ? If you say no, then you are in agreement with thousands of adults whose parents contemplated aborting them some decades ago. 100% of the respondents surveyed, chose life.
The fetus does not have a "choice" - looks like the GOP is speaking up where they cannot speak for themselves.
The choice of the fetus overrules the choice of the pregnant woman.
There ya go folks. That is indeed the voice of the GOP.