Republican SNAP Proposals Could Take Food Away From Millions of Low-Income Individuals and Families

And you don't understand math.

I guess we're even.
No sir, we're not. You assume that if Walmart was owned and operated by its workers collectively, they would be conducting business within the exact same constraints as Walmart does today, with identical priorities and responsibilities, and you're wrong. The outcome of Walmart's business operations wouldn't be identical or even similar to what they are today, and that includes its potential. Your so-called "math" is being misapplied to Walmart in a completely different context and form. Remember I said, if Walmart continues to exist, in a more socialistic society, it would take a different form?

Indeed Todd, despite your objections, Walmart could invest in affordable housing for employees, clinics providing primary care, and robust education programs that actually uplift its workforce. Getting loans for these projects is hardly a stretch, because any enterprise generating the kind of revenue Walmart does, would have no problem securing financing, from various sources (both private and public) especially when the mission of the productive enterprise or "business", is serving the workforce and the community. Walmart in this socialistic mode of operation and form, would definitely enjoy a range of government incentives because lawmakers often create tax breaks and grants for non-profits, co-ops, and other socially beneficial ventures.

Moreover Todd, they could also form their own lobbying arm. If billionaires like Musk or giant corporations like Amazon can twist Congress’s arm for favorable legislation, why couldn’t a nationwide cooperative representing 1.6 million American worker-owners do the same? Imagine Walmart with a super PAC that lobbies for Medicare for All or invests in local communities instead of funneling profits to a handful of billionaire assholes like Elon Musk and his ilk. There’d be no shareholders screaming about short-term, quarterly returns; the workers themselves would decide how to expand or pivot. If building a new distribution center or hiring more staff increases stability and long-term prosperity, that’s the direction they’d take, rather than chasing a quick bump in the stock price for some ******* hedge fund.

Your math is aimed at propping up the status quo, as though the only way for Walmart to operate is by cutting labor costs and boosting dividends. But a co-op wouldn’t face the same shareholder mandates, and it wouldn’t need to show continual profit growth just to please investors. It would be free to pursue government contracts, apply for lower tax rates, and reinvest in its people, all while delivering reliable goods to customers and building up communities throughout America. The result is a vast, worker-driven enterprise that’s still competitive and powerful.


Read Todd:


61T7rDGzHGL._SL1200_.jpg
Look for it on Amazon.
 
How in the world do you think that rent or housing prices are going to fall if we’re taken over?

Being taken over by illegal aliens? Justin really did you dirty, didn't he?

How are you going to fix our housing problems when you can fix your own?

No, idiot, you have to fix your own like we're fixing our own.
Don't import millions while making home building more difficult.
Cut the home building red tape, stop wasting time, energy and money on green nonsense.
Stop importing criminal aliens. Deport the ones you have.

Rent and housing prices are not going to fall until there is no longer a shortage of housing in Canada.

I know, Justin made things so much worse for you.
Importing millions that work and contribute to our society and pissing racist scumbags like you off. Gold. Let them in and make the heads of racist White bigots swell up and explode like in this David Chappel skit, when he takes off his KKK hood:

 
All the money billionaires make goes back into the economy

There is no hoarding
Your ignorant posts are infamous.

——"billionaires won't create jobs if we tax them,” Is a myth made up by billionaires so we won't tax them.
 
How in the world do you think that rent or housing prices are going to fall if we’re taken over?

Being taken over by illegal aliens? Justin really did you dirty, didn't he?

How are you going to fix our housing problems when you can fix your own?

No, idiot, you have to fix your own like we're fixing our own.
Don't import millions while making home building more difficult.
Cut the home building red tape, stop wasting time, energy and money on green nonsense.
Stop importing criminal aliens. Deport the ones you have.

Rent and housing prices are not going to fall until there is no longer a shortage of housing in Canada.

I know, Justin made things so much worse for you.
If only you could think rather than spout the establishment narrative over and over again…..

"billionaires won't create jobs if we tax them,” Is a myth made up by billionaires so we won't tax them.
 
No sir, we're not. You assume that if Walmart was owned and operated by its workers collectively, they would be conducting business within the exact same constraints as Walmart does today, with identical priorities and responsibilities, and you're wrong. The outcome of Walmart's business operations wouldn't be identical or even similar to what they are today, and that includes its potential. Your so-called "math" is being misapplied to Walmart in a completely different context and form. Remember I said, if Walmart continues to exist, in a more socialistic society, it would take a different form?

Indeed Todd, despite your objections, Walmart could invest in affordable housing for employees, clinics providing primary care, and robust education programs that actually uplift its workforce. Getting loans for these projects is hardly a stretch, because any enterprise generating the kind of revenue Walmart does, would have no problem securing financing, from various sources (both private and public) especially when the mission of the productive enterprise or "business", is serving the workforce and the community. Walmart in this socialistic mode of operation and form, would definitely enjoy a range of government incentives because lawmakers often create tax breaks and grants for non-profits, co-ops, and other socially beneficial ventures.

Moreover Todd, they could also form their own lobbying arm. If billionaires like Musk or giant corporations like Amazon can twist Congress’s arm for favorable legislation, why couldn’t a nationwide cooperative representing 1.6 million American worker-owners do the same? Imagine Walmart with a super PAC that lobbies for Medicare for All or invests in local communities instead of funneling profits to a handful of billionaire assholes like Elon Musk and his ilk. There’d be no shareholders screaming about short-term, quarterly returns; the workers themselves would decide how to expand or pivot. If building a new distribution center or hiring more staff increases stability and long-term prosperity, that’s the direction they’d take, rather than chasing a quick bump in the stock price for some ******* hedge fund.

Your math is aimed at propping up the status quo, as though the only way for Walmart to operate is by cutting labor costs and boosting dividends. But a co-op wouldn’t face the same shareholder mandates, and it wouldn’t need to show continual profit growth just to please investors. It would be free to pursue government contracts, apply for lower tax rates, and reinvest in its people, all while delivering reliable goods to customers and building up communities throughout America. The result is a vast, worker-driven enterprise that’s still competitive and powerful.


Read Todd:


Look for it on Amazon.

Remember I said, if Walmart continues to exist, in a more socialistic society, it would take a different form?

I know they wouldn't perform as well.

Walmart could invest in affordable housing for employees, clinics providing primary care, and robust education programs that actually uplift its workforce. Getting loans for these projects is hardly a stretch, because any enterprise generating the kind of revenue Walmart does, would have no problem securing financing,

It worked for Venezuela. DURR

Your math is aimed at propping up the status quo,

Why don't you post the numbers for an employee owned firm where they were
able to waste money...err...invest in all the things you want Walmart to do?
 
Importing millions that work and contribute to our society and pissing racist scumbags like you off. Gold. Let them in and make the heads of racist White bigots swell up and explode like in this David Chappel skit, when he takes off his KKK hood:



Importing millions that work and contribute to our society and pissing racist scumbags like you off. Gold.

It's working so well for Canada, that the police told people to leave their car keys near the front door, so that when thieves break it, they'll, hopefully, just steal your car and go.

And have you heard about Canadian housing costs? Whew!
 
If only you could think rather than spout the establishment narrative over and over again…..

"billionaires won't create jobs if we tax them,” Is a myth made up by billionaires so we won't tax them.

You're right, we should tax the shit out of billionaires.

How'd that work for France?
 
You're right, we should tax the shit out of billionaires.

How'd that work for France?
I agree. Good plan, but your too dumb and duped to understand.

Why do you want billionaires controlling your government? Are you stupid?

Rhetorical.
 
I agree. Good plan, but your too dumb and duped to understand.

Why do you want billionaires controlling your government? Are you stupid?

Rhetorical.

I agree. Good plan

Show me all the success France had in taxing them and maybe I'll go along.

Why do you want billionaires controlling your government?

How do they control it? What should we do to stop them?
 
I agree. Good plan

Show me all the success France had in taxing them and maybe I'll go along.

Why do you want billionaires controlling your government?

How do they control it? What should we do to stop them?
Most of Europe taxes their billionaires at much higher rates than the US. Dipshit.

Stop lying traitor. Your first allegiance is to Israel. You know full well how billionaires control the government and you approve.
 
I agree. Good plan

Show me all the success France had in taxing them and maybe I'll go along.

Why do you want billionaires controlling your government?

How do they control it? What should we do to stop them?
Why do you even waste your time with this commie ******* idiot?
 
He needs help justifying his job working for Putin.
I just now put him on ignore. I don't need to waste my time reading idiotic drivel.

Just because somebody disagrees with me doesn't mean anything. But when they start continuously spewing propaganda bullshit/lies and nothing else, I'm done with them.

Besides, it's probably either a 'bot or a paid-poster from the DISGUSTING FILTH, Academia (community service) or the DNC. It's a big deal on some Campuses. They even give extra credits on some of them.

Not worth my time. Or yours.
 
15th post
Remember I said, if Walmart continues to exist, in a more socialistic society, it would take a different form?

I know they wouldn't perform as well.

Walmart could invest in affordable housing for employees, clinics providing primary care, and robust education programs that actually uplift its workforce. Getting loans for these projects is hardly a stretch, because any enterprise generating the kind of revenue Walmart does, would have no problem securing financing,

It worked for Venezuela. DURR

Your math is aimed at propping up the status quo,

Why don't you post the numbers for an employee owned firm where they were
able to waste money...err...invest in all the things you want Walmart to do?
More of Todd's irrelevant comments. As if successful co-ops don't exist throughout Europe and other modern, industrialized countries. You're so dishonest in your criticism.
 
Last edited:
More of Todd's irrelevant comments. As if successful co-ops don't exist throughout Europe and other modern, industrialized countries. You're so dishonest in your criticism.
Succesful coops do not exist THROUGHOUT europe or anywhere else

There are very few succesful ones and they are propped up by the tax payers

The vast majority are failures
 
Back
Top Bottom