Food stamp work rules don't increase employment, researchers say

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
82,187
Reaction score
45,977
Points
2,605
Location
In a Republic, actually
‘Proponents of work requirements argue that they incentivize people who are "work-ready" to seek and keep jobs, reducing dependence on government assistance and upholding the "dignity of work." Rhonda Rogombé serves as health and safety net policy analyst for the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy. She and her colleagues have studied the effects of SNAP work rules and found that requiring recipients to work does not lower an area's unemployment rate.’


That Republicans are wrong again as usual comes as no surprise.

For conservatives work requirements were never about reducing unemployment, they are punitive measures intended to punish low income Americans and express the right’s unwarranted distain for public assistance programs – programs that are both necessary and proper in a free market system where poverty is an inevitable byproduct, poverty that is not the fault of the poor.
 
‘Proponents of work requirements argue that they incentivize people who are "work-ready" to seek and keep jobs, reducing dependence on government assistance and upholding the "dignity of work." Rhonda Rogombé serves as health and safety net policy analyst for the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy. She and her colleagues have studied the effects of SNAP work rules and found that requiring recipients to work does not lower an area's unemployment rate.’


That Republicans are wrong again as usual comes as no surprise.

For conservatives work requirements were never about reducing unemployment, they are punitive measures intended to punish low income Americans and express the right’s unwarranted distain for public assistance programs – programs that are both necessary and proper in a free market system where poverty is an inevitable byproduct, poverty that is not the fault of the poor.
Whatever the answer is it does not exist now for poverty is not improving.
 
‘Proponents of work requirements argue that they incentivize people who are "work-ready" to seek and keep jobs, reducing dependence on government assistance and upholding the "dignity of work." Rhonda Rogombé serves as health and safety net policy analyst for the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy. She and her colleagues have studied the effects of SNAP work rules and found that requiring recipients to work does not lower an area's unemployment rate.’


That Republicans are wrong again as usual comes as no surprise.

For conservatives work requirements were never about reducing unemployment, they are punitive measures intended to punish low income Americans and express the right’s unwarranted distain for public assistance programs – programs that are both necessary and proper in a free market system where poverty is an inevitable byproduct, poverty that is not the fault of the poor.
Yet another victim of foil helmet marketing hype pretends he knows how conservatives think.
 
Back
Top Bottom