C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
‘Proponents of work requirements argue that they incentivize people who are "work-ready" to seek and keep jobs, reducing dependence on government assistance and upholding the "dignity of work." Rhonda Rogombé serves as health and safety net policy analyst for the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy. She and her colleagues have studied the effects of SNAP work rules and found that requiring recipients to work does not lower an area's unemployment rate.’
www.cbsnews.com
That Republicans are wrong again as usual comes as no surprise.
For conservatives work requirements were never about reducing unemployment, they are punitive measures intended to punish low income Americans and express the right’s unwarranted distain for public assistance programs – programs that are both necessary and proper in a free market system where poverty is an inevitable byproduct, poverty that is not the fault of the poor.
Food stamp work rules don't increase employment, researchers say
Work requirements will encourage people who are able to work to seek and maintain jobs, proponents say. But researchers haven't found that they lower the unemployment rate.
That Republicans are wrong again as usual comes as no surprise.
For conservatives work requirements were never about reducing unemployment, they are punitive measures intended to punish low income Americans and express the right’s unwarranted distain for public assistance programs – programs that are both necessary and proper in a free market system where poverty is an inevitable byproduct, poverty that is not the fault of the poor.