you people are so broken I cant even laugh anymore,,
Says the person who reads conspiracy theories all night long in their basement, then wakes up and posts their fragmented and confused thoughts on it the next morning.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you people are so broken I cant even laugh anymore,,
you must have my comment confused with someone elses cause all I said is I dont care as long s the feds stay in their constitutional lane,,Says the person who reads conspiracy theories all night long in their basement, then wakes up and posts their fragmented and confused thoughts on it the next morning.
It’s not okay for the Government to be giving money to any entity who is not directly employed by or contracted with the Government to provide goods and services related to the 17 SPECIFIC ITEMS listed in Articke I, Section 8 of the ConstitutionThey'll criticize things like medicaid but when giant corporations get handouts it's ok.
What’s really happening is corporate welfare on a massive scale. Walmart, Amazon, and other corporate giants absolutely rely on the government to subsidize their workforce
Walmart subsidizes no one but themselves. Two questions, one, why would the richest family in America need handouts? Two, why criticize things like SNAP, Medicaid, etc. but not when billionaires get handouts? hmm
Certainly not the $14-$19/hr starting wage with benefits that Walmart offers.Exactly!
Just think of all the money those low-skilled workers could be making somewhere else.
DURR
You assume that because these workers are paid poverty wages, that means they must be “low-skilled” and therefore deserve to be underpaid? What a joke. The reality is that every single worker in that store is essential to Walmart’s profits, from the cashiers to the stockers to the janitors. Without them, Walmart doesn’t function. Their labor generates billions in revenue, yet the company refuses to share even a fair fraction of that wealth with the people who actually produce it. That’s not “the market at work,” that’s exploitation, plain and simple.Exactly!
Just think of all the money those low-skilled workers could be making somewhere else.
DURR
why would the richest family in America need handouts?
I agree, no one in the Walton family should receive any SNAP benefits.
Two, why criticize things like SNAP, Medicaid, etc. but not when billionaires get handouts?
Which billionaire got a handout? Where?
The price of goods and services has risen dramatically in the past few years, especially since COVID-19, largely due to government policies, supply chain disruptions, and corporate price gouging. While Walmart has raised wages to $14–$19 an hour in many locations, let’s not pretend they did it out of the kindness of their hearts. These wage increases only happened because of public pressure, because society, the media, and even the government called out the fact that Walmart was paying wages people could not survive on.Certainly not the $14-$19/hr starting wage with benefits that Walmart offers.
You assume that because these workers are paid poverty wages, that means they must be “low-skilled” and therefore deserve to be underpaid? What a joke. The reality is that every single worker in that store is essential to Walmart’s profits, from the cashiers to the stockers to the janitors. Without them, Walmart doesn’t function. Their labor generates billions in revenue, yet the company refuses to share even a fair fraction of that wealth with the people who actually produce it. That’s not “the market at work,” that’s exploitation, plain and simple.
Moreover, skills don’t determine whether someone deserves a living wage. Being able to survive shouldn’t be a privilege reserved for those deemed “skilled” enough by the whims of capitalists or Todd. Every full-time worker should be paid enough to afford housing, food, healthcare, and basic necessities, period. If Walmart and Amazon can afford to pay their executives obscene salaries and hand out billions in stock buybacks, they can damn well afford to pay their workers a wage that doesn’t leave them dependent on government assistance. And if they won’t do it voluntarily, then the government should force them to.
You and your ilk love to say, “If these workers don’t like their wages, they should just go work somewhere else.” But where exactly, Todd? If every major corporation follows Walmart’s example, slashing wages, crushing unions, and relying on government subsidies to prop up their workforce, where are these workers supposed to go? The truth is, that this system is designed to keep workers trapped in low-paying jobs while billionaires rake in the profits. That’s why raising the minimum wage to a living wage is non-negotiable. No one working full-time in the United States of America should be struggling to survive while billionaires hoard everything. If that offends you Todd, too bad.
Walmart alone receive an estimated 7.8 billion in federal government subsidies and tax breaks a year, but sure, go ahead and continue being the gullible rube you are and complain about SNAP, lmao.
This is easy, laborers generate all the revenue, practically, and hence should collectively own Walmart. Society shouldn't allow capitalists to own the productive, for-profit enterprise, because mass production is a social endeavor, not a private one.Their labor generates billions in revenue, yet the company refuses to share even a fair fraction of that wealth with the people who actually produce it.
Wow!
How many billions in revenue?
How much does Walmart keep away from all the noble, low-skilled workers?
This is easy, laborers generate all the revenue, practically, and hence should collectively own Walmart. Society shouldn't allow capitalists to own the productive, for-profit enterprise, because mass production is a social endeavor, not a private one.
Practically ALL of the revenue is produced by labor. Human labor (not monkeys, giraffes, or robots) working in any productive for-profit enterprise, should collectively own and run it. "Durrrr", that was easy.Cool story.
How many billions in revenue?
How much does Walmart keep away from all the noble, low-skilled workers?
Practically ALL of the revenue is produced by labor. Human labor (not monkeys, giraffes, or robots) working in any productive for-profit enterprise, should collectively own and run it. "Durrrr", that was easy.
Yeah, obviously all the revenue generated by Walmart should go to the people stocking the shelves and running the register, because the billions in inventory, equipment and real estate don't count in your world.
Property is theft, right?
Now, if you could answer, between running away and frothing at the mouth, that'd be great.
How many billions in revenue?
How much does Walmart keep away from all the noble, low-skilled workers?
Yeah, obviously all the revenue generated by Walmart
should go to the people stocking the shelves and running the register,
because the billions in inventory, equipment and real estate don't count in your world.
Property is theft, right?
Now, if you could answer, between running away and frothing at the mouth, that'd be great.
Irrelevant. Because it's all generated by human labor, whether "skilled" or "unskilled", everyone who works in those thousands of stores, are the ones producing all of the companies revenue, hence they should own it together. Mass production is a social endeavor not a private or personal one. The fact that Todd the billionaire has:How many billions in revenue?
How much does Walmart keep away from all the noble, low-skilled workers?
Fourteen to nineteen bucks/hr with benefits for unskilled labor is not poverty wages. It doesn't have anything to do with billionaires--it is reality. Also the value of multi national companies and their CEOs compensation has absolutely nothing to do with SNAP or abused public assistance, no matter how many word salads you serve. Get back on topic or STFUYou assume that because these workers are paid poverty wages, that means they must be “low-skilled” and therefore deserve to be underpaid? What a joke. The reality is that every single worker in that store is essential to Walmart’s profits, from the cashiers to the stockers to the janitors. Without them, Walmart doesn’t function. Their labor generates billions in revenue, yet the company refuses to share even a fair fraction of that wealth with the people who actually produce it. That’s not “the market at work,” that’s exploitation, plain and simple.
Moreover, skills don’t determine whether someone deserves a living wage. Being able to survive shouldn’t be a privilege reserved for those deemed “skilled” enough by the whims of capitalists or Todd. Every full-time worker should be paid enough to afford housing, food, healthcare, and basic necessities, period. If Walmart and Amazon can afford to pay their executives obscene salaries and hand out billions in stock buybacks, they can damn well afford to pay their workers a wage that doesn’t leave them dependent on government assistance. And if they won’t do it voluntarily, then the government should force them to.
You and your ilk love to say, “If these workers don’t like their wages, they should just go work somewhere else.” But where exactly, Todd? If every major corporation follows Walmart’s example, slashing wages, crushing unions, and relying on government subsidies to prop up their workforce, where are these workers supposed to go? The truth is, that this system is designed to keep workers trapped in low-paying jobs while billionaires rake in the profits. That’s why raising the minimum wage to a living wage is non-negotiable. No one working full-time in the United States of America should be struggling to survive while billionaires hoard everything. If that offends you Todd, too bad.