Rep. Pascrell Jr. Seeks To Disbar giuliani And 22 Other trump Lawyers

They should be disbarred. Attorneys are officers of the court. They violate their oaths when they bring frivolous lawsuits. Especially true now given that the sole purpose of the lawsuits is to undermine a full and fair election.

This has to be the most unfairest election in history, any moron can see that, to disbar his lawyers is Fascist as hell.

No one thinks that Biden received more legal votes than The President.
No one-
 
No, suing for libel is saying the other side is a bunch of fucking liars AFTER the argument has been made. Proving libel is one of the harder things to do, and rightly so, but it is NOT trying to stop the argument. Threatening lawyers for doing their job is just a way to scare other lawyers from representing "unpopular" viewpoints or cases.

Stop trying to equivocate this, you are looking even more idiotic than you usually do.
And getting Rudy disbarred would take a very similar process where they'd have to prove malpractice.

Trump's using libel lawsuits to scare people from saying things he doesn't want because it costs money to defend against these frivolous lawsuits.

These are not that different and you've not pointed out any real distinctions.

Not even close. Libel requires proving the person knowingly lied, Disbarment is not even a true governmental process, but a process with Bar associations, which have a current tendency to lean left.

They are 100% different and you are trying to equivocate because you are a pathetic SJW ****-bunt.
 
I don't know if anything will come of this but I agree with what he is doing.

giulini and other lawyers have been doing a lot of damage to our nation, election system and democracy.
He's a Democrat and he's going to disbar 20 Republican lawyers. Ever wondow why and how we lost our gun rights in America?

How did Pascrell ever get in office if it wasn't through a fraudulent election in his district? Pascrell himself needs to be impeached and charged with high treason, but of course the Democrat bar won't let us do that.
 
How is suing for libel comparable to trying to disbar someone's attorneys for representing them?
Suing for libel is attempting to stop an argument rather than counter it.

Just as you said.
You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Suing for libel is suing to stop false statements that are disparaging from continuing.

Do you know the ultimate defense to a libel suit?

I'll tell you.

THE FUCKING TRUTH!!!

Nobody's doing that here. No, they are trying to stop the very lawyers bringing the action.

This reeks of fear and confirms the truth.
 
To be found guilty of libel you have to be found guilty of knowingly lying.

Are you saying newspapers should be able to lie with impunity?
Who cares if they're found guilty or not? Trump isn't looking for a verdict, he's looking to harm people by making them spend money to defend themselves.

He is trying to clear himself by proving libel, which is very difficult to do against the media.

How many libel cases does he have going?
 
I don't know if anything will come of this but I agree with what he is doing.

giulini and other lawyers have been doing a lot of damage to our nation, election system and democracy.

Lawyers shouldn't be allowed to lie so blatantly and spread conspiracies.

They deserve to be disbarred.

Democrat Fascism in full bloom
 
How is suing for libel comparable to trying to disbar someone's attorneys for representing them?
Suing for libel is attempting to stop an argument rather than counter it.

Just as you said.
You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Suing for libel is suing to stop false statements that are disparaging from continuing.

Do you know the ultimate defense to a libel suit?

I'll tell you.

THE FUCKING TRUTH!!!

Nobody's doing that here. No, they are trying to stop the very lawyers bringing the action.

This reeks of fear and confirms the truth.

Coleytroll literally never does.
 
No, suing for libel is saying the other side is a bunch of fucking liars AFTER the argument has been made. Proving libel is one of the harder things to do, and rightly so, but it is NOT trying to stop the argument. Threatening lawyers for doing their job is just a way to scare other lawyers from representing "unpopular" viewpoints or cases.

Stop trying to equivocate this, you are looking even more idiotic than you usually do.
And getting Rudy disbarred would take a very similar process where they'd have to prove malpractice.

Trump's using libel lawsuits to scare people from saying things he doesn't want because it costs money to defend against these frivolous lawsuits.

These are not that different and you've not pointed out any real distinctions.

Not even close. Libel requires proving the person knowingly lied, Disbarment is not even a true governmental process, but a process with Bar associations, which have a current tendency to lean left.

They are 100% different and you are trying to equivocate because you are a pathetic SJW ****-bunt.
And disbarring requires proving a lawyer is filing frivolous lawsuits. And even then, it’s far from a guaranteed thing.

You’re flailing. Can’t even come up with a coherent argument.
 
I don't know if anything will come of this but I agree with what he is doing.

giulini and other lawyers have been doing a lot of damage to our nation, election system and democracy.

Lawyers shouldn't be allowed to lie so blatantly and spread conspiracies.

They deserve to be disbarred.

a pos thug lopped a couple of peoples heads off yet his lawyers were called the dream.
Amazes me how much one sided the justice system has become
 
How is suing for libel comparable to trying to disbar someone's attorneys for representing them?
Suing for libel is attempting to stop an argument rather than counter it.

Just as you said.
You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Suing for libel is suing to stop false statements that are disparaging from continuing.

Do you know the ultimate defense to a libel suit?

I'll tell you.

THE FUCKING TRUTH!!!

Nobody's doing that here. No, they are trying to stop the very lawyers bringing the action.

This reeks of fear and confirms the truth.
And do you know what the defense to disbarment is? Being a legitimate lawyer instead of filing bullshit lawsuits.
 
This Hitler Wannabe wants the entire Trump administration thrown in jail. He makes all kinds of charges about 'innumberable crimes"...."treason"......"treachery"....

.....and bring ZERO EVIDENCE.

This clown needs to let us see his evidence, or he should be sued for libel.

The Dimwinger party is full of Fascists.


Rep. Bill Pascrell Calls For Investigation Of Members Of The Trump Administration For ‘Innumerable Crimes Against The United States’



Democratic New Jersey Rep. Bill Pascrell called for an investigation of members of the Trump administration for what he claims are “innumerable crimes against the United States,” according to a Tuesday press release.


“Donald Trump and members of his administration have committed innumerable crimes against the United States,” Pascrell said in the press release. “He has endangered our national security. He ripped families apart. He poisoned the Census. He has personally profited from his office. He has attacked our elections and sought to throttle democracy. He was rightly impeached by the House of Representatives. He has engaged in treachery, in treason. He has all but given up on governing and protecting our nation and if he had a shred of dignity he would resign today.”

“Therefore, in 2021 the entire Trump administration must be fully investigated by the Department of Justice and any other relevant offices,” the statement continued. “Donald Trump along with his worst enablers must be tried for their crimes against our nation and Constitution. Importantly, any further abuse of the sacred pardon power to shield criminals would itself be obstruction of justice, and any self-pardons would be illegal.”

 
No, suing for libel is saying the other side is a bunch of fucking liars AFTER the argument has been made. Proving libel is one of the harder things to do, and rightly so, but it is NOT trying to stop the argument. Threatening lawyers for doing their job is just a way to scare other lawyers from representing "unpopular" viewpoints or cases.

Stop trying to equivocate this, you are looking even more idiotic than you usually do.
And getting Rudy disbarred would take a very similar process where they'd have to prove malpractice.

Trump's using libel lawsuits to scare people from saying things he doesn't want because it costs money to defend against these frivolous lawsuits.

These are not that different and you've not pointed out any real distinctions.

Not even close. Libel requires proving the person knowingly lied, Disbarment is not even a true governmental process, but a process with Bar associations, which have a current tendency to lean left.

They are 100% different and you are trying to equivocate because you are a pathetic SJW ****-bunt.
And disbarring requires proving a lawyer is filing frivolous lawsuits. And even then, it’s far from a guaranteed thing.

You’re flailing. Can’t even come up with a coherent argument.

What flailing, you tried a false equivocation, got called on it, and now are just blathering.

Run away poseur, you got called out and bitch slapped.
 
How is suing for libel comparable to trying to disbar someone's attorneys for representing them?
Suing for libel is attempting to stop an argument rather than counter it.

Just as you said.
You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Suing for libel is suing to stop false statements that are disparaging from continuing.

Do you know the ultimate defense to a libel suit?

I'll tell you.

THE FUCKING TRUTH!!!

Nobody's doing that here. No, they are trying to stop the very lawyers bringing the action.

This reeks of fear and confirms the truth.
And do you know what the defense to disbarment is? Being a legitimate lawyer instead of filing bullshit lawsuits.
Update us when they are disbarred, lil Adolf.
 
How is suing for libel comparable to trying to disbar someone's attorneys for representing them?
Suing for libel is attempting to stop an argument rather than counter it.

Just as you said.
You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Suing for libel is suing to stop false statements that are disparaging from continuing.

Do you know the ultimate defense to a libel suit?

I'll tell you.

THE FUCKING TRUTH!!!

Nobody's doing that here. No, they are trying to stop the very lawyers bringing the action.

This reeks of fear and confirms the truth.
And do you know what the defense to disbarment is? Being a legitimate lawyer instead of filing bullshit lawsuits.

Bullshit lawsuits is a matter of opinion, libel is a matter of fact (or actually the willful ignorance of facts)

Poseur.
 
They should be disbarred. Attorneys are officers of the court. They violate their oaths when they bring frivolous lawsuits. Especially true now given that the sole purpose of the lawsuits is to undermine a full and fair election.


If there are witnesses actually coming forward, then the lawsuits are not frivolous. But I'm sure you long for the day when your Marxists can decide who does or who does not have the right to speak.
Election results can be challenged and It's not certified yet so there is no crisis.
 

Forum List

Back
Top