Rep. Pascrell Jr. Seeks To Disbar giuliani And 22 Other trump Lawyers

[Ray From Cleveland]

2nd - If counties chose when the polls close for in-person voting, they could do the same for when absentee voting closes.

No they cannot because that's already written into law.

IMPORTANT: Voters who have not yet cast their mail or absentee ballot are urged to hand-deliver their voted ballots as soon as possible to their county election office or other county drop off location or drop box. Ballots must be delivered by 8pm on Election Day but the sooner the better. Voters should no longer use postal service delivery as it is too late to guarantee your ballot will be delivered in time.

PA Mail-in and Absentee Ballot

All eligible PA voters can choose to vote by mail ballot. Learn more about voting by mail ballot.

www.votespa.com

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Some counties were allowed to fix ballots and other counties were not. The state did not make those rules, the counties made that decision.

Actually that's a decision of county election boards, same as they chose how many polling places, and how many people staff them. If they have the resources to call up voters to correct omissions that's because they chose to. While others may limit the number of polling places, limit the staff, and not call up voters, that is because they chose to.

Correct, they are the arbitrators if ballots get corrected or not. They don't call anybody, they fix the vote themselves. However since we don't elect presidents by county, and elect them by state, then the state has to be uniform on how ballots are processed. It could be in favored Republican areas, votes were just thrown out while in favored Democrat areas, they were corrected by the election workers. It's not uniform and tilts the election.

 

[postman]

IMPORTANT: Voters who have not yet cast their mail or absentee ballot are urged to hand-deliver their voted ballots as soon as possible to their county election office or other county drop off location or drop box. Ballots must be delivered by 8pm on Election Day but the sooner the better. Voters should no longer use postal service delivery as it is too late to guarantee your ballot will be delivered in time.

PA Mail-in and Absentee Ballot

All eligible PA voters can choose to vote by mail ballot. Learn more about voting by mail ballot.

www.votespa.com

What's the difference between a judge ordering the polls to stay open longer because a voting machine broke down, and a judge ordering the absentee ballots stay open longer because the postal system broke down?

Both are a breakdown of the system beyond the control of the voter, that was remedied by giving extra time to make up for it. Time that goess beyond what is written in law.

Why can they change one, and not the other.

 

[postman]

Correct, they are the arbitrators if ballots get corrected or not.

Actually they are the one's who resource whether they have people to call voters to correct their votes or not.

It's not done by regulation, but by resources.

 

[Faun]

Some counties were allowed to fix ballots and other counties were not. The state did not make those rules, the counties made that decision.

Actually that's a decision of county election boards, same as they chose how many polling places, and how many people staff them. If they have the resources to call up voters to correct omissions that's because they chose to. While others may limit the number of polling places, limit the staff, and not call up voters, that is because they chose to.

Correct, they are the arbitrators if ballots get corrected or not. They don't call anybody, they fix the vote themselves. However since we don't elect presidents by county, and elect them by state, then the state has to be uniform on how ballots are processed. It could be in favored Republican areas, votes were just thrown out while in favored Democrat areas, they were corrected by the election workers. It's not uniform and tilts the election.

Uh, no, it doesn't have to be uniform throughout the state. There is no such law.

 

[postman]

However since we don't elect presidents by county, and elect them by state, then the state has to be uniform on how ballots are processed.

that argument was rejected by the en-banc of the 9th circuit court, based on there being no actual legal remedy to require uniform "equal protection" throughout a state.

They also relied on Bush v Gore, which limited the equal protection requirement to the "facts of this case"

 

[postman]

Uh, no, it doesn't have to be uniform throughout the state. There is no such law.

Correct. They even pointed out the impossibility of making such a requirement. In California they use four different types of voting machines, with error rates from 0.5% to 2.5%. The court said there was no equal protection requirement to order a county improve it's voting machines to match another county.

Hence there is no requirement for uniform standards.

Bush v Gore said that the Florida Supreme Court couldn't make up "new" standards, unless they were uniform. They could leave the old non-uniform standards in place.

 

[martybegan]

When did Trump himself comment on it?

When he was running against her. Lots of conservatives said the same thing.

Blowback bitch.

I noticed you haven't produced an actual quote. Was it about her defending the guy or laughing about it?

I noticed you didn’t show the Lincoln Project publishing anyone’s private phone numbers either.

Clinton didn’t laugh about defending him. She laughed because he passed a polygraph which the prosecutor got him to take.

From twitchy, redacted for obvious reasons. The article I posted talked about this, and naturally didn't continue with the actual post. But here you go. I expect backpaddling and justification from you. Now where are your Trump quotes about Clinton?

'Is this targeted harassment?' Lincoln Project sics their minions on Pittsburgh lawyers filing election suits on behalf of Trump; UPDATED

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Maybe if Trump continues to file bullshit lawsuits, they will start to respond with sanction requests.

That is NEVER how it works, dude.

They AWAYS ask for sanctions and attorney's fees. ALWAYS.

These lawsuits are being defended by the secretary of state, and election boards, and any other controlling body. They are state lawyers, already paid by the state. Unless the state contracts with private attorneys, there are no attorneys fees to collect. They're on the clock.

So, because these are government lawyers, they are not entitled to attorney fees on behalf of the state?

You are damn clueless.

 

[colfax_m]

When did Trump himself comment on it?

When he was running against her. Lots of conservatives said the same thing.

Blowback bitch.

I noticed you haven't produced an actual quote. Was it about her defending the guy or laughing about it?

I noticed you didn’t show the Lincoln Project publishing anyone’s private phone numbers either.

Clinton didn’t laugh about defending him. She laughed because he passed a polygraph which the prosecutor got him to take.

From twitchy, redacted for obvious reasons. The article I posted talked about this, and naturally didn't continue with the actual post. But here you go. I expect backpaddling and justification from you. Now where are your Trump quotes about Clinton?

'Is this targeted harassment?' Lincoln Project sics their minions on Pittsburgh lawyers filing election suits on behalf of Trump; UPDATED

Still looking for where they published their private phone numbers. That’s not what was in this tweet.

 

[postman]

These lawsuits are being defended by the secretary of state, and election boards, and any other controlling body. They are state lawyers, already paid by the state. Unless the state contracts with private attorneys, there are no attorneys fees to collect. They're on the clock.

So, because these are government lawyers, they are not entitled to attorney fees on behalf of the state?

You are damn clueless.

Actually that's sometimes put into state or federal law (depending on the agency) that asking for legal fees would stifle the individual from filing lawsuits.

220. Attorney's Fees

www.justice.gov

The general rule in this country, the so-called "American Rule" is that each party must pay its own attorney's fees. See Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society, 421 U.S. 240 (1975). There are, however, numerous federal statutes providing for attorney fee awards where the United States or a federal agency or official is a party. The most generally applicable statute authorizing attorney's fees awards against the United States is the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, which makes the federal government liable for fees where:

(1) any other party would be liable under common law or under the terms of any federal statute which specifically provides for such an award, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b); or

(2) in any civil action (other than cases sounding in tort) brought by or against the United States in any court having jurisdiction of that action, unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1).

 

[Rogue AI]

Funny how hard progs are fighting to keep this out of court. Wonder why?

 

[martybegan]

When did Trump himself comment on it?

When he was running against her. Lots of conservatives said the same thing.

Blowback bitch.

I noticed you haven't produced an actual quote. Was it about her defending the guy or laughing about it?

I noticed you didn’t show the Lincoln Project publishing anyone’s private phone numbers either.

Clinton didn’t laugh about defending him. She laughed because he passed a polygraph which the prosecutor got him to take.

From twitchy, redacted for obvious reasons. The article I posted talked about this, and naturally didn't continue with the actual post. But here you go. I expect backpaddling and justification from you. Now where are your Trump quotes about Clinton?

'Is this targeted harassment?' Lincoln Project sics their minions on Pittsburgh lawyers filing election suits on behalf of Trump; UPDATED

Still looking for where they published their private phone numbers. That’s not what was in this tweet.

Nah, just calling for them to be harrassed, and provided phone numbers.

And why are you fixated on the number having to be "private"? The redacted parts are where the numbers were.

 

[colfax_m]

Nah, just calling for them to be harrassed, and provided phone numbers.

The provided phone numbers are listed on their website, are they not?

 

[martybegan]

Nah, just calling for them to be harrassed, and provided phone numbers.

The provided phone numbers are listed on their website, are they not?

So what? It's still doxxing, it's still them calling for harassment, and it still got them banned.

Are the direct phone numbers listed on the website?

It's amazing how much you will do to support harassment as long as the "right people" are getting harassed.

 

[colfax_m]

So what? It's still doxxing, it's still them calling for harassment, and it still got them banned.

Are the direct phone numbers listed on the website?

It's amazing how much you will do to support harassment as long as the "right people" are getting harassed.

So they're not publishing private information, are they?

 

[martybegan]

So what? It's still doxxing, it's still them calling for harassment, and it still got them banned.

Are the direct phone numbers listed on the website?

It's amazing how much you will do to support harassment as long as the "right people" are getting harassed.

So they're not publishing private information, are they?

Do you have a link showing the numbers were public information? On the corporate website?

And it's STILL DOXXING YOU FUCKING SJW CUM BUCKET.

Why did twitter ban them?

 

[colfax_m]

So what? It's still doxxing, it's still them calling for harassment, and it still got them banned.

Are the direct phone numbers listed on the website?

It's amazing how much you will do to support harassment as long as the "right people" are getting harassed.

So they're not publishing private information, are they?

Do you have a link showing the numbers were public information? On the corporate website?

And it's STILL DOXXING YOU FUCKING SJW CUM BUCKET.

Why did twitter ban them?

People

www.porterwright.com

Funny how you guys support twitter banning people all of a sudden. It was some great crime before that required Dorsey to testify before a furious little Teddy Cruz, what a few weeks ago?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Funny how hard progs are fighting to keep this out of court. Wonder why?

If they were confident they would support it. If Biden does take this election, there will always be an question mark next to his name as President if these claims are not looked into carefully.

 

[colfax_m]

If they were confident they would support it. If Biden does take this election, there will always be an question mark next to his name as President if these claims are not looked into carefully.

I don't support Trump's attempt to disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of voters.