Rep. Pascrell Jr. Seeks To Disbar giuliani And 22 Other trump Lawyers

So changing the rules in the middle of the game?

Judge orders all Spalding County polls to remain open until 9 ...
www.cbs46.com › news › judge-orders-all-spalding-count...

Nov 3, 2020 — A judge ordered all polling locations in Spalding County to remain open until 9 p.m. on Election Day after voting machines across the ... Provisional ballots will still be sent to all 18 precincts to allow a vote via paper ballot.


This happened in the middle of election day.
 
I don't know if anything will come of this but I agree with what he is doing.

giulini and other lawyers have been doing a lot of damage to our nation, election system and democracy.

Lawyers shouldn't be allowed to lie so blatantly and spread conspiracies.

They deserve to be disbarred.

They’re exposing our Venezuela system
 
This is interesting. The GOP is fine with extending the closing time of the polls in one location, so that they get to vote AFTER, the results from other counties start getting reported.

But they're against extending the time to receive mail-in ballots, that have to be postmarked (and therefore voted) by or before election day.
 
The GOP is fine with extending in-person voting deadlines, but is against extending Mail-in ballot deadlines.

Does that have anything to do with republican telling their people to vote in person, and the democrats telling their people to vote by mail?
 
Yet you accept a judge ordering the acceptance of ballots hours after the election was officially over. And not passed by the legislature.

What's the difference?

The election board decides what hours of operation are, not legislatures. You're talking two hours vs three days. Plus there was a valid reason for keeping the polls open late. The machine didn't work. You can't disenfranchise voters over technical errors.

It's the legislature that determines when ballots have to be turned in by, and they wrote into law the end of election day. The judge had absolutely no reason to extend it beyond what was written into law. Voters had more than ample time to send in their ballots. They also had the option of voting in person like the millions of others. So any disenfranchisement was due to their error, not machines, not the election board.

The bottom line is it opens up the system to fraud. You're a Biden voter. Watching the ballot count, things are not looking well for him. So you run to your desk, grab that ballot that was sitting there for weeks, and mail it in on Tuesday night. The ballot gets there by Friday and is counted as a legal vote.
 
Actually state legislatures do that. And usually they set a uniform time throughout the state.

No, the county does that. But even if what you said was true, it's allowed to stand until somebody files a suit against the decision. It's just like the equal protection violation that's being leveled. Some counties were allowed to fix ballots and other counties were not. The state did not make those rules, the counties made that decision.
 
They should be disbarred. Attorneys are officers of the court. They violate their oaths when they bring frivolous lawsuits. Especially true now given that the sole purpose of the lawsuits is to undermine a full and fair election.

Why shouldn't they be killed?

They have opposed the party. The penalty for any opposition to the GLORIOUS PEOPLES PARTY must be death.

Seig Heil Comrade, Seig Heil indeed.
:102:

Should we have speech laws the spell out penalties for opposition to the party? I mean, if we oppose party dinners at swank resorts while peasants are prohibited from eating in public, should that bring a punishment of several years in a forced labor camp, where voting for Donald Trump is a death sentence, Comrade?

Seig Heil indeed, Comrade.
 
Last edited:
It's the legislature that determines when ballots have to be turned in by, and they wrote into law the end of election day. The judge had absolutely no reason to extend it beyond what was written into law. Voters had more than ample time to send in their ballots.

This is where you're wrong. The usual delivery standard is that if they mail their ballot by Monday, it gets there by tuesday, in time to be counted.

The post office changed those standards through several mechanisms, so that ballots mailed on Saturday, or Monday, wouldn't arrive until Tuesday or Wednesday. The postmaster started a policy of dismantling mail sorting machines, and delaying the mail for 24 hours or more by telling drivers if the mail is even 1 minute late, to leave the station without it, and process that mail the next day.
 
Yet you accept a judge ordering the acceptance of ballots hours after the election was officially over. And not passed by the legislature.

What's the difference?

The election board decides what hours of operation are, not legislatures. You're talking two hours vs three days. Plus there was a valid reason for keeping the polls open late. The machine didn't work. You can't disenfranchise voters over technical errors.

It's the legislature that determines when ballots have to be turned in by, and they wrote into law the end of election day. The judge had absolutely no reason to extend it beyond what was written into law. Voters had more than ample time to send in their ballots. They also had the option of voting in person like the millions of others. So any disenfranchisement was due to their error, not machines, not the election board.

The bottom line is it opens up the system to fraud. You're a Biden voter. Watching the ballot count, things are not looking well for him. So you run to your desk, grab that ballot that was sitting there for weeks, and mail it in on Tuesday night. The ballot gets there by Friday and is counted as a legal vote.
"Plus there was a valid reason for keeping the polls open late. The machine didn't work. You can't disenfranchise voters over technical errors."

You also can't disenfranchise voters who mail their ballot on time but their ballot is delivered late by the post office. Yet you rightatds are fighting to do that.
 
Actually state legislatures do that. And usually they set a uniform time throughout the state.
No, the county does that.

1st - PA election law

thehill.com › opinion › judiciary › 524113-after-electio...

Nov 3, 2020 — By state law, mail-in and absentee ballots are supposed to be ... by 8 p.m. on Election Day, which is when the polls close for in-person voting.

2nd -
If counties chose when the polls close for in-person voting, they could do the same for when absentee voting closes.
 
When did Trump himself comment on it?
When he was running against her. Lots of conservatives said the same thing.

Blowback bitch.

I noticed you haven't produced an actual quote. Was it about her defending the guy or laughing about it?
I noticed you didn’t show the Lincoln Project publishing anyone’s private phone numbers either.

Clinton didn’t laugh about defending him. She laughed because he passed a polygraph which the prosecutor got him to take.
 
Some counties were allowed to fix ballots and other counties were not. The state did not make those rules, the counties made that decision.

Actually that's a decision of county election boards, same as they chose how many polling places, and how many people staff them. If they have the resources to call up voters to correct omissions that's because they chose to. While others may limit the number of polling places, limit the staff, and not call up voters, that is because they chose to.
 

Forum List

Back
Top