Remember that whole Greenland thing?

[Mac1958]

So it's not over. It appears we're working behind the scenes to gain covert influence there.

Denmark summons US envoy over claims of interference in Greenland

Perhaps we can just cut to the chase here: Is there anyone who is willing to defend/discuss why we need to expand to all of North America? Do we really need more living space, known long ago as Lebensraum? Or are we just planning to take over these countries without their approval to get our hands on their natural resources, as is currently happening in Europe?

Is there anyone who'd like to enlighten us on these questions, specifically and honestly?

 

[BrokeLoser]

Do we really need more living space, known long ago as Lebensraum? Or are we just planning to take over these countries without their approval to get our hands on their natural resources, as is currently happening in Europe?

Is there anyone who'd like to enlighten us on these questions, specifically and honestly?

Aren’t you nose-ringers supportive of the reconquista? You don’t really care that Mexico has passively invaded the U.S. and forced an unauthorized, illegal, inorganic and unwanted demography change.
It’s kind of hard to take you seriously.

 

[elektra]

Aren’t you nose-ringers supportive of the reconquista? You don’t really care that Mexico has passively invaded the U.S. and forced an unauthorized, illegal, inorganic and unwanted demography change.
It’s kind of hard to take you seriously.

democrats fight against what is best for America.

what has biden or obama or clinton or carter done to make america great. What can we point at and say, wow democrats did something great

there is no conquest of greenland, no colonialization yet the democrats must turn every thing for the people into something bad

of course, it would be bad for greenland when they become a USA territory, if democrats regain power

 

[Mac1958]

democrats fight against what is best for America.
what has biden or obama or clinton or carter done to make america great. What can we point at and say, wow democrats did something great
there is no conquest of greenland, no colonialization yet the democrats must turn every thing for the people into something bad
of course, it would be bad for greenland when they become a USA territory, if democrats regain power

So you're saying we're no longer interested in Greenland? Or Canada?

 

[BrokeLoser]

So you're saying we're no longer interested in Greenland? Or Canada?

We’re saying your questions matter not.

 

[fncceo]

So you're saying we're no longer interested in Greenland? Or Canada?

More interested in someplace with nice weather and beaches ... How long until Gaza has been cleaned out?

 

[elektra]

So you're saying we're no longer interested in Greenland? Or Canada?

The OP stated conquest not interest. Which is it.

 

[Mac1958]

The OP stated conquest not interest. Which is it.

Use whatever word you like. Would you support what Trump has said about Greenland and Canada or not, and why?

Or should we just leave them alone, as they have asked?

 

[HaShev]

1) Protecting from the north- National security
2) resources also national security
3) place to send punished politicians

 

[Mac1958]

1) Protecting from the north- National security
2) resources also national security
3) place to send punished politicians

What if they want to be left alone? What if they say "no"?

 

[fncceo]

What if they want to be left alone? What if they say "no"?

 

[IM2]

Aren’t you nose-ringers supportive of the reconquista? You don’t really care that Mexico has passively invaded the U.S. and forced an unauthorized, illegal, inorganic and unwanted demography change.
It’s kind of hard to take you seriously.

Mexico hasn't done anything, and the unauthorized, illegal, inorganic and unwanted demography change. started when whites floated over here.

 

[HaShev]

What if they want to be left alone? What if they say "no"?

they work out a deal for assurances protection from northern invasions, in exchange they get ally status protection.

 

[elektra]

Use whatever word you like. Would you support what Trump has said about Greenland and Canada or not, and why?

Or should we just leave them alone, as they have asked?

After you provide a quote with a link, i can reply. Your article has no quote from Trump. So how about instead of being a HEADLINE HUNTER, you do some intellectal research and present the facts.

The AP article is extremely vague, propaganda.

 

[shockedcanadian]

So it's not over. It appears we're working behind the scenes to gain covert influence there.

Denmark summons US envoy over claims of interference in Greenland

Perhaps we can just cut to the chase here: Is there anyone who is willing to defend/discuss why we need to expand to all of North America? Do we really need more living space, known long ago as Lebensraum? Or are we just planning to take over these countries without their approval to get our hands on their natural resources, as is currently happening in Europe?

Is there anyone who'd like to enlighten us on these questions, specifically and honestly?

That's the job of government obviously.

If Denmark had so well treated their citizens so admirablt they wouldn't be concerned. Who would want to leave a Utopian society they claim they provide?

Greenland is a free nation and they make their own decisions, even the Denmark government stated this. This isn't the 17th Century, citizens are free to pursue their right to Self Determination.

 

[cnm]

Aren’t you nose-ringers supportive of the reconquista? You don’t really care that Mexico has passively invaded the U.S. and forced an unauthorized, illegal, inorganic and unwanted demography change.
It’s kind of hard to take you seriously.

Funny you should say that...

 

[Mac1958]

they work out a deal for assurances protection from northern invasions, in exchange they get ally status protection.

What if they don't want any kind of deal? None? As they have said many times?

 

[Mac1958]

After you provide a quote with a link, i can reply. Your article has no quote from Trump. So how about instead of being a HEADLINE HUNTER, you do some intellectal research and present the facts.

The AP article is extremely vague, propaganda.

You obviously don't know anything about this story. Trump has made several very clear comments.

"One way or the other, we're gonna get it." His words. In an official State of the Union address to Congress.

Never mind.

 

[Mac1958]

Some pretty vague responses so far.

Let's try something a bit simpler:

If Trump forcibly took Greenland and/or Canada in any way against their governments' will, would you support it?

 

[frigidweirdo]

1) Protecting from the north- National security
2) resources also national security
3) place to send punished politicians

If you think it's fair to invade other countries for "security reasons", then invade EVERYONE. Everyone could get nukes, put them on a rocket and fire them at the US. So, get rid of them all.