Pelosi's Star Witness has yet another lie exposed. Zero credibility.

[Faun]

Oh, poor Farouk - he's too stupid to grasp that no one gives a fuck about your demands.



{Both Engel and Ornato are prepared to testify that Trump did not go for Engel's throat or attempt to seize the wheel, according to CNN. An unidentified Secret Service source added that Ornato denies telling Hutchinson that story.}

Ornato already met with Jan. 6 committee twice: Report - Washington Examiner

A Secret Service official who featured prominently in testimony before the House Jan. 6 committee on Tuesday has reportedly met with the panel twice this year. Anthony “Tony” Ornato, who served as White House's deputy chief of staff for operations, testified in January and then in March...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

LOLOLOLOL

You can't quote either of them, just as I said, because they're not on the record saying that. You're quoting an unnamed source.

And what do YOU think about news stories based on unnamed sources? You think they're "rumors."

I love how you Communists make shit up and then talk about it as if it's established facts.

"Unnamed Sources" isn't journalism, it's rumor mongering.

​

 

[Faun]

I don’t see where he told them to intimidate Pence.

Try again.

That's because you're an idiot. They got the message...

 

[Faun]

All these unnamed people telling reporters things. No names,, no quotes, no oath to tell the truth.

Get back to us when you have TESTIMONY, given UNDER OATH.

Pretty hypocritical of him, huh?

I love how you Communists make shit up and then talk about it as if it's established facts.

"Unnamed Sources" isn't journalism, it's rumor mongering.

​

 

[Uncensored2008]

How stupid are you? Were you dropped on your head as an infant?

Is there a defendant? Or charges?

This is a Hearing to find out what happened, and who was involved.

This is a Nazi show trial to attack Trump.

The Reich fears Trump and is desperate to rig the 2024 election so the people are denied the choice to vote for him.

What we're finding out is that things went exactly as planned, and Trump was very enthusiastic about what was happening. And you little sheep are shitting your pants daily at the things that are coming out.

Day in, day out, you defend the liar, the conman, the guy who tried to destroy your country - on purpose. How stupid do you have to be to come here day in and day out, and defend this criminal??????

What we are finding is what we already knew, the Nazi democrats are vassals of Communist China serving Emperor Xi. That they lie and perjure incessantly in their defamation and demagoguery - putting up fake "witnesses" to spread the big lie.

What started as justification for taking political prisoners and ending due process has devolved into what we ALWAYS knew this to be, part of the attack by the Nazis on Donald Trump.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Pretty hypocritical of him, huh?

​

Psychopath - no one is unnamed.

Anthony Ornato, Robert Engel.

All 9 agents used their real names.

You pathological pile of shit.

 

[Uncensored2008]

LOLOLOLOL

You can't quote either of them, just as I said, because they're not on the record saying that. You're quoting an unnamed source.

And what do YOU think about news stories based on unnamed sources? You think they're "rumors."

​

Who is "unnamed," psychopath?

You have no grip on reality.

 

[Nostra]

Quote Ornato and Engel saying they didn't say that to Hutchinson...

Quote them saying it.

 

[Dragonlady]

All 9 agents have used their real names and offered to testify under oath to the Nazi tribunal.

ChiComlady is just lying - as always.

The only ones pulling "anonymous sources" shit are CNN.

No one has quoted and named a Secret Security source. Everyone spoke with "agents" who were in the car, but not one attributable quote. No oath to tell the truth, NOTHING. You have NOTHING. Not one name of one agent, much less a sworn statement, made under oath.

Added to which is the idiocy of you parroting what every right wing fake news outlet is reporting, which is that the incident in the car didn't happen. All while ignoring the really damning stuff that Ms. Hutchison testified to, like everyone with an ounce of brains telling Trump not to do this, that it was illegal and they'd all be arrested for doing it.

Stuff like that.

 

[Dragonlady]

Who is "unnamed," psychopath?

You have no grip on reality.

Says the guy who believes everything that Donald Trump utters. You and (Sl)easy65 have to be the two dumbest posters on this board. Such faithful sheep you are.

 

[Uncensored2008]

No one has quoted and named a Secret Security source.

There is no such thing as "Secret Security."

Cassidy Hutchinson lied under oath that Tony Ornato told her "Trump lunged for the wheel" - Agent Ornato - catch the name there ChiCom - you and your fellow Nazis have been conditioned to bleat "unnamed sources," but as always - it's all fucking lies. All the agents have used their real names - you just look like what you are, a pathological liar and utterly pathetic.

Everyone spoke with "agents" who were in the car, but not one attributable quote. No oath to tell the truth, NOTHING. You have NOTHING. Not one name of one agent, much less a sworn statement, made under oath.

Added to which is the idiocy of you parroting what every right wing fake news outlet is reporting, which is that the incident in the car didn't happen. All while ignoring the really damning stuff that Ms. Hutchison testified to, like everyone with an ounce of brains telling Trump not to do this, that it was illegal and they'd all be arrested for doing it.

Stuff like that.

Again, the agents refute the perjury of Hutchinson, the perjury suborned by Adam Schitt (Nazi, CA) and Cheney (unemployed, WY)

This blew up in your face and your melting down.

It's hilarious to watch.

 

[Seymour Flops]

No one has quoted and named a Secret Security source. Everyone spoke with "agents" who were in the car, but not one attributable quote. No oath to tell the truth, NOTHING. You have NOTHING. Not one name of one agent, much less a sworn statement, made under oath.

Added to which is the idiocy of you parroting what every right wing fake news outlet is reporting, which is that the incident in the car didn't happen. All while ignoring the really damning stuff that Ms. Hutchison testified to, like everyone with an ounce of brains telling Trump not to do this, that it was illegal and they'd all be arrested for doing it.

Stuff like that.

You have a point about Cassidy having sworn under oath and no one having contradicted her under oath as of yet. If no one ever does swear under oath that she is wrong, your point will be strengthened.

It is weakened by the fact that the committee could have called the agents at any time. I read on here, but could not find in the news, that those agents have already been questioned behind closed doors. If their stories are the same as Cassidy's, why not call them for a first hand account of Trump battling the Secret Service guys?

Why are they questioning people behind closed doors in the first place, if their goal is to get out the truth? Why did they question Cassidy in four different sessions before they allowed her to speak in public?

Doesn't pass the smell test.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Says the guy who believes everything that Donald Trump utters. You and S (Sl)easy65 have to be the two dumbest posters on this board. Such faithful sheep you are.

TWUMP!!!

Fucking moron.

And dumbest on the board?

Tell us again about "unnamed sources" dumbfuck?

 

[Uncensored2008]

You have a point about Cassidy having sworn under oath and no one having contradicted her under oath as of yet. If no one ever does swear under oath that she is wrong, your point will be strengthened.

It is weakened by the fact that the committee could have called the agents at any time. I read on here, but could not find in the news, that those agents have already been questioned behind closed doors. If their stories are the same as Cassidy's, why not call them for a first hand account of Trump battling the Secret Service guys?

Why are they questioning people behind closed doors in the first place, if their goal is to get out the truth? Why did they question Cassidy in four different sessions before they allowed her to speak in public?

Doesn't pass the smell test.

Cassidy Hutchinson=Amber Heard

 

[Dragonlady]

You have a point about Cassidy having sworn under oath and no one having contradicted her under oath as of yet. If no one ever does swear under oath that she is wrong, your point will be strengthened.

It is weakened by the fact that the committee could have called the agents at any time. I read on here, but could not find in the news, that those agents have already been questioned behind closed doors. If their stories are the same as Cassidy's, why not call them for a first hand account of Trump battling the Secret Service guys?

Why are they questioning people behind closed doors in the first place, if their goal is to get out the truth? Why did they question Cassidy in four different sessions before they allowed her to speak in public?

Doesn't pass the smell test.

Because the point of her testimony isn't that Trump tried to force the Secret Service to drive him to the Capitol. The point is that Donald Trump knows damn well that he lost the election, and he knew what he was doing was illegal, and he did it anyway, because he was so desperate to cling to power by any means necessary

Trump sent any angry, armed mob to the Capitol to kill senior members of the government, and he wanted to go and lead them in the insurrection. And his behaviour that day was desperate and quite crazy.

Every Committee obtains witness testimony behind closed doors because they need to know who's testimony is relevant. Witnesses with truly relevant testimony are invited back for a live session, but Trump's top advisors have all declined and with good reason - they all have significant criminal exposure. Given what the Committee now knows about January 6th, they'd have to be crazy to come back.

Cassidy Hutchison's attorney was being paid for by Donald Trump, when she first appeared before the Committee. When she finished with her testimony, she told friends that she had more to tell the Committee, and she fired the Trump lawyers, and got an independent attorney, for this last appearance before the Committee. She has been receiving threats from MAGA World since she fired the Trump attorney.

Trump has been paying the legal fees of at least a dozen staffers appearing before the Committee. I'm firmly of the belief that the guy who is paying the bill is going to get more protection than the person he was supposed to be working for will get.

The Committee is looking into witness tampering by Trump's staffers, and Cassidy Hutchinson is now receiving protection. Just like every other person Donald Trump names and attacks. Lisa Page, the Squad, Michael Cohen, Dr. Faucci, those election workers in Pennsylvannia. He's like a mob boss putting out hits on people, and his Cult goes after these people and ruins their lives.

Trump has been promoting violence since his first rallies where he offered to pay the legal fees of anyone arrested for beating up protestors, and his loyal followers have been taking him at his word ever since.

 

[Faun]

Psychopath - no one is unnamed.

Anthony Ornato, Robert Engel.

All 9 agents used their real names.

You pathological pile of shit.

Just how retarded are you, Fruitcake?

Neither Ornato nor Engel are the source. The source was unnamed.

"A source close to the Secret Service tells me both Bobby Engel, the lead agent, and the presidential limousine/SUV driver are prepared to testify under oath that neither man was assaulted and that Mr. Trump never lunged for the steering wheel." ~ Peter Alexander​

 

[Faun]

Who is "unnamed," psychopath?

You have no grip on reality.

Poor, unhinged Fruitcake.

"A source close to the Secret Service tells me both Bobby Engel, the lead agent, and the presidential limousine/SUV driver are prepared to testify under oath that neither man was assaulted and that Mr. Trump never lunged for the steering wheel." ~ Peter Alexander​

 

[Faun]

Quote them saying it.

Quote me saying they said it...

 

[excalibur]

You have a point about Cassidy having sworn under oath and no one having contradicted her under oath as of yet. If no one ever does swear under oath that she is wrong, your point will be strengthened.

It is weakened by the fact that the committee could have called the agents at any time. I read on here, but could not find in the news, that those agents have already been questioned behind closed doors. If their stories are the same as Cassidy's, why not call them for a first hand account of Trump battling the Secret Service guys?

Why are they questioning people behind closed doors in the first place, if their goal is to get out the truth? Why did they question Cassidy in four different sessions before they allowed her to speak in public?

Doesn't pass the smell test.

This strongly implies that they had been spoken to behind closed doors previously, where he says "reappear".

​

Anthony Guglielmi, the service’s chief of communications, told POLITICO that select committee investigators did not ask Secret Service personnel to reappear or answer questions in writing in the 10 days before asking Hutchinson about the matter at the hearing.​

​

“[W]e were not asked to reappear before the Committee in response to yesterday’s new information and we plan on formally responding on the record,” he wrote in an email. “We have and will continue to make any member of the Secret Service available.”​

Secret Service: Jan. 6 panel didn’t reach out before Hutchinson’s explosive Trump testimony

The agency says it got no outreach for 10 days before the committee aired testimony about Donald Trump’s behavior in the presidential vehicle Jan. 6.

www.politico.com

In fact, it has been reported that they questioned this woman at least 4-times in secret. Meaning they were forming her public testimony, IOW coaching her. That they refuse to release any transcripts of the secret testimony tells us what they've been up to.

 

[Winston]

they want to…the “committee” won’t let them.

Bullshit. Document that from a reputable source or quit repeating nonsense.

 

[Winston]

Don’t need documentation, as it’s well known they have not been called to testify. They have said they are prepared to, meaning they haven’t been called. Are you truly this stupid? Now you can STFU.

They do not have to wait to be called. They have already testified, but at the close of the last hearing the Chairman invited anyone that had previously testified that they could come forward, amend their statements or testify further to things that they may "now" remember.