Why isn't the Jan 6 Commission defending their star witness Hutchinson by sending a subpoena to Tony Ornato?

Nostra

Diamond Member
Oct 7, 2019
71,140
61,243
3,615
Hutchinson is the Jan 6 STAR WITNESS, but her testimony has been debunked by reports the two SS agents she referenced refute her story. They say they are willing to testify for the committee, the SS says they are willing to let them testify.


The only thing holding up them testifying under oath is the Jan 6 committee's refusal to call them as witnesses. Why do you think that is?

My take is they know they coached Hutchinson and her lies would be exposed by the two people with actual first hand knowledge of the situation.

Can someone else give a plausible different reason the committee refuses to hear from these agents?


 
Hutchinson is the Jan 6 STAR WITNESS, but her testimony has been debunked by reports the two SS agents she referenced refute her story. They say they are willing to testify for the committee, the SS says they are willing to let them testify.


The only thing holding up them testifying under oath is the Jan 6 committee's refusal to call them as witnesses. Why do you think that is?

My take is they know they coached Hutchinson and her lies would be exposed by the two people with actual first hand knowledge of the situation.

Can someone else give a plausible different reason the committee refuses to hear from these agents?


Of course they coached her. She testified four times behind closed doors until they had massaged her story and carefully rehearsed the final version. Democrat on here know that. They know the committee is as crooked as a corkscrew, they're just happy that it is generating "news," about Trump, their obsession.

You know how if you get a song stuck in your head, you can get it out if you sing it very loudly all the way through? That's what they're trying to do with Trump who has been stuck in their heads for seven years now. But it's more like this for them:

 
Of course the coached her. She testified four times behind closed doors until they had massaged her story and carefully rehearsed the final version. Democrat on here know that. They know the committee is as crooked as a corkscrew, they're just happy that it is generating "news," about Trump, their obsession.

You know how if you get a song stuck in your head, you can get it out if you sing it very loudly all the way through? That's what they're trying to do with Trump who has been stuck in their heads for seven years now. But it's more like this for them:


Well, the obvious reply to your post is that if they didn't coach her and she actually has some evidence to back up her wild-ass claims the easiest way to clear all this up is to put Ornato and the other agent under oath.

It really is odd they have yet to even try to do that. Especially since they have both offered to come testify.
 
This is a relatively minor point. All acknowledge that Trump wanted urgently to go to the Capitol. What difference does it make how he made his desires known?
 
Well, the obvious reply to your post is that if they didn't coach her and she actually has some evidence to back up her wild-ass claims the easiest way to clear all this up is to put Ornato and the other agent under oath.

It really is odd they have yet to even try to do that. Especially since they have both offered to come testify.
Yes, and they laugh when the Dems on here keep saying, "why don't Ornato and the other guy testify under oath?" as if they could walk in and the TDS committee would have no choice but to swear them in.
 
This is a relatively minor point. All acknowledge that Trump wanted urgently to go to the Capitol. What difference does it make how he made his desires known?
A President being accused of attacking the SS and trying to hijack the 'Beast" to go to the Capital to overthrow the government is a relatively minor point?
 
:laughing0301:

R.93c627e21991b5464c84c6a63bd2a31a
 
A President being accused of attacking the SS and trying to hijack the 'Beast" to go to the Capital to overthrow the government is a relatively minor point?


Trump was Kung-Fu Fighting.
 
So nobody can explain why the committee doesn't want to clear up the fact their star witness had her BOMBSHELL TESTIMONY refuted by those she claimed to be quoting?
 
Hutchinson is the Jan 6 STAR WITNESS, but her testimony has been debunked by reports the two SS agents she referenced refute her story. They say they are willing to testify for the committee, the SS says they are willing to let them testify.


The only thing holding up them testifying under oath is the Jan 6 committee's refusal to call them as witnesses. Why do you think that is?

My take is they know they coached Hutchinson and her lies would be exposed by the two people with actual first hand knowledge of the situation.

Can someone else give a plausible different reason the committee refuses to hear from these agents?



The Secret Service refused to let them testify. Trump's hand picked Director of the agency issued a "Statement" denying the allegations. Right before Biden fired his ass.
 
The Secret Service refused to let them testify. Trump's hand picked Director of the agency issued a "Statement" denying the allegations. Right before Biden fired his ass.
Not surprised Xiden fired him for speaking the truth.
 
So nobody can explain why the committee doesn't want to clear up the fact their star witness had her BOMBSHELL TESTIMONY refuted by those she claimed to be quoting?

Whether or not Trump attacked his driver is utter irrelevant to the investigation, FuckBoi. They're investigating an INSURRECTION.

This is like someone driving their car into a crowd of people, causing death and mayhem, and you're going bat shit crazy denying he hit the traffic light and damaged public property.
 
The Secret Service refused to let them testify. Trump's hand picked Director of the agency issued a "Statement" denying the allegations. Right before Biden fired his ass.
Once again you are a lying sack of shit.

The SS said they could testify, liar.

 
Whether or not Trump attacked his driver is utter irrelevant to the investigation, FuckBoi. They're investigating an INSURRECTION.

This is like someone driving their car into a crowd of people, causing death and mayhem, and you're going bat shit crazy denying he hit the traffic light and damaged public property.
If it is irrelevant, why was Nazi Piglosy’s BOMBSHELL WITNESS there to tell about how she heard a rumor Trump attacked the driver, stupid?
 
The Secret Service refused to let them testify. Trump's hand picked Director of the agency issued a "Statement" denying the allegations. Right before Biden fired his ass.
Regardless of party affiliation or Trump love/hate status, we should all be very concerned about these agencies defying our elected officials.
 
Nothing in your link said they refused to testify. They simply retained counsel, Simp.

Quote the agents saying they refuse to testify, or their attorneys.

Why didn't Nazi Piglosi just subpoena them like she did all the Trump guys? Explain that, Dumbass.
It’s literally the first sentence.

“Top Secret Service agents who tried to undermine former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony to the Jan. 6 committee have hired private lawyers and are refusing to cooperate with the investigation, members of the panel said over the weekend.”
 
It’s literally the first sentence.

“Top Secret Service agents who tried to undermine former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony to the Jan. 6 committee have hired private lawyers and are refusing to cooperate with the investigation, members of the panel said over the weekend.”
Um, that isn't the agents or their attorneys, Simp. It's a member of the Dimtard Clown Show, Dumbass.

If they wanted to hear from them why have they not sent a subpoena? Hell, not a single member has come out so say they have even contacted them and asked them to testify.
 

Forum List

Back
Top