- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,041
- 16,267
- 2,180
Which territory are we discussing here?
The territory seized in 1967, mostly.
https://cmep.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/SettlementStatements.pdf
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Which territory are we discussing here?
Which territory are we discussing here?
The territory seized in 1967, mostly.
https://cmep.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/SettlementStatements.pdf
Which territory are we discussing here?
The territory seized in 1967, mostly.
https://cmep.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/SettlementStatements.pdf
The 1967 war between Israel and Jordan is over. The Armistice line of 1949 no longer exists. It has been replaced by a treaty of peace between Israel and Jordan and the boundaries between those two States are demarcated in that peace treaty.
The Arab Palestinians were not a Party to that conflict and have no territorial rights arising from that conflict. (Please note, I am not saying that the Arab Palestinians have no rights to territory, only that their rights do not arise from a conflict between Israel and Jordan.)
Yes, but the PLO declared independence in 1988, and set out the territory of their state as being in the West Bank. Numerous countries in the world have now recognized this state.
But then that begs the question: Are we talking the about the occupation of the West Bank or are we talking about all of Israel? That point needs to be clearly defined. And until it is, the issues can never be resolved, once and for all.
But one more time, why is this AMERICA'S problem? To the degree that if Rep. Ihlan even SUGGESTS the Zionists have undue influence, why we need congressional resolutions to denounce that shit.
Illegal settlements is just code for "places where Jews live". There is nothing illegal about building homes in territory under your control.
Oh. I thought the Geneva Conventions had something to say about that. Still, what's a ghetto or two among friends, eh?There is nothing illegal about building homes in territory under your control.
Oh. I thought the Geneva Conventions had something to say about that. Still, what's a ghetto or two among friends, eh?
On the contrary, I admire how well the Israelis learnt their lessons. Very efficient.It appears that you are one of those, already noted, who like to throw vague accusations at Israel with no sense of actual understanding of the conflict.
Moah hasbara!Yeah, I know what you "thought". But you obviously have no idea what the GCIV actually says and why it can't apply to the conflict in Israel. You just repeat the trite little sound bytes you hear.
Moah hasbara!Yeah, I know what you "thought". But you obviously have no idea what the GCIV actually says and why it can't apply to the conflict in Israel. You just repeat the trite little sound bytes you hear.
MOAH!!!
The fact is that when blind supporters of Israel are confronted with objective, document, factual accounts of human rights violations by Israel, or other acts by Israel contrary to international law, they resort to the ‘anti-Semitic’ red herring fallacy in an attempt to deflect from those violations.
I learned on this board that "Israel is stealing (or occupying) Palestinian land, Interesting indeed seeing as Jews were indigenous Palestinians when there were no Muslims at all let alone Muslim Palestinians. So is it not then true that Israel is stealing (or occupying) their own land?
And what percentage of todays Palestinians even have a title or deed to the land they claim is theirs? Is it actually possible the overwhelming majority of todays Palestinians are but squatters for generations on Israel's land?