Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 68,638
- 58,829
- 3,615
The evidence was in her testimony.Such as? Lets see the evidence.There was ZERO evidence against Kavanaugh, Tardboi.You obviously don't know what advise and consent means, Dummy. Barry wasn't denied his pick. He made it.More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses.
What is extreme about it?
Democrats think Trump being elected is extreme and requires an extreme response.
YOU LOST! Deal with it.
Ginsberg died...it happens...now she needs to be replaced...so what is extreme? The leftists aren't getting their way?
So you need to "justify" your extreme responses by calling a normal situation "extreme"?
Yes, she should be replaced. After the election. If Trump wins, ACB gets confirmed and I'll have no issue with that. If Trump loses, Biden gets to nominate his own judge. McConnell set this standard. I don't give two shits if Trump is an incumbent. There is still a possibility of a new President being selected. The people deserve a say in the matter.
"The people deserve a say in the matter."
You are absolutely right. And they do and did have a say in the matter....They elected Donald J Trump as their President ( Yes he is the President and you should probably get over it already) for 4 years....not 3 years and 9 months....4 years. Their choice for 4 years...not 3 years and 9 months....has made his choice for the next Supreme Court Justice. The people also had their say in the Senate for a term of 6 years, one third of which ends January 2021....Not November 2020. Now, their advise and consent to the next Supreme Court Justice will be made doing the peoples will.
Again, I don't care about advise and consent. You lost that argument when you denied Obama his pick. Unless I've been asleep, he was to serve until January, 2017. So it's irrelevant. McConnell set the standard. You don't get to alter the standard just because it's your guy in the Oval Office.
Numerous SC justices have been confirmed during an election year. Just so happens it was when the WH and Sen were controlled by the same party. You need a history lesson, Tardboi..
Exactly. advise and consent doesnt mean accuse a perfectly suitable judge of gang rape. Liberals are fucked in the head.
Kavanaugh was a scumbag. Like Thomas before him. The only people fucked in the head are the people that supported these nominees (and yes, I'll give Biden a minus for that).
Did you hear anyone making the same allegations against Neil Gorsuch?
None.
There was LOTS, true believer. The guy was a complete scumbag.
Hey, did you ever ask yourself, why didn't Trump nominate ACB then instead of a guy his handlers told him was going to be an issue?
Birds of a feather? Smidge bit of misogyny?
The weirdo lady didn't know where it happened, or even what year. And her two supposed "witnesses" contradicted her story. Plus, she was caught in multiple lies.
Only a single digit IQ fuckwit like you would buy her story.
The evidence was in her testimony. Several Republican Senators said her story was believable. And she wasn't the only one. Which should have disqualified the scumbag right there. Sorry, I don't think scumbags should be allowed to serve on the highest court. Same thing should have happened to Thomas after Anita Hill gave her testimony. Again, you didn't hear anything like these allegations coming out against Alito, Roberts, Gorsuch. Trump nominated him because he liked the fact that he saw Kavanaugh as someone who was just like him. He didn't nominate ACB...because she was a woman. The only reason she's up for nomination right now is because RBG died and it's politically expedient.
Bring it. Let's see the evidence.