The Supreme Court and the "politics" of birthright citizenship and of course changing tunes of history.

[TNHarley]

Don't care.



The Founding Slave Rapists didn't write the 14th.
The 14th was necessary to fix their initial screwup of allowing slavery to start with.

The point is, they didn't specifically exclude children of immigrants.

Yea idk why I said founders.

 

[GMCGeneral]

Sure there's a difference. Legal immigration requires too much time and too much money.

So far, to get my wife sponsored for permanent residency, I've had to file 250 pages of documentation and pay $3350.00 in legal and filing fees.

This is on top of the seven years she languished in the Asylum application with no action being taken on her case, despite her situation being one the US has railed about for decades (the mistreatment of Christians in China).

That's why I want to SCREAM whenever I hear any idiot talk about "legal" immigration.

Boo ******* hoo. That's the procedure.

 

[Zincwarrior]

I-N-T-E-N-T.
We know that doesnt include ambassadors children. How do we know that? Because that was debated. We know the meaning of the amendment. We just choose to ignore certain parts of it.

Agreed. They are not under jurisdiction due to ratified treaties.