Dems version of a one party state

[eagle7-31]

There's a reason why Democrats have been so persistently enflamed by Fidel Castro and his failed communist regime in Cuba.
It's a one-party state. And its rule is permanent. The island has been ruled continuously on this model for 66 years.
Wittingly or not, they are now advocating for the same model to be imposed on the United States of America.
Top political operative James Carville, who has organized many successful elections, is saying the quiet part out loud, according to legal affairs commentator Jonathan Turley

Various Democrats have been openly discussing their plans after retaking power to change the system so they never lose power again.

Democratic strategist James Carville has been one of the most vocal and returned to the subject this week in laying out how they will make D.C. and Puerto Rico states and pack the Supreme Court with a liberal majority.

On his podcast with Al Hunt, Carville explained, “If the Democrats win the presidency and both houses of Congress, I think on day one, they should make Puerto Rico [and] D.C. a state, and they should expand the Supreme Court to 13. F— it. Eat our dust.”

Notably, this week, New Jersey just elected a radical new member, Analilia Mejia, who ran on packing the Court and other radical agenda items.

While some of us have written about the expansion of the Court, these politicians and pundits are pushing for the packing, not just gradual expanding, of the Court. However, Carville (curiously on a national podcast) seriously suggested that Democrats should keep the plan quiet: “Don’t run on it. Don’t talk about it. Just do it.”

What they want is to deceive Americans into voting for them on the Abigail Spanberger model, and then let them have it, good and hard, once they ensconce themselves into power, securing their power and ending any consideration of free market ideas.
Inclusion? Not this time. Diversity? Not of ideas. Equity? Only in poverty.

And it would be a grotesque regime such as Fidel Castro ran, that of a small billionaire class required to be party-loyal or die, and a vast populace with neither money, nor power, nor even a right to associate around ideas. Spies would be omnipresent. There would be only fist-waving for the party glory, and the mass penury that speaks for itself. Corruption would be embedded within the system. The rich would be harvested by the state to nothing. The young and strong would flee. But unlike Cuba, there would be no state to flee to.

We already see a lot of that in one-party states such as California and Minnesota, where fraud is embedded in the system. and a kakistocracy rises to the top. Think: 'Swalwell,' 'Newsom,' 'Schiff,' 'Katie Porter,' 'Rob Bonta,' 'Tim Walz,' 'Keith Ellison,' 'J.B. Pritzker,' 'Kathy Hochul,' 'Zohran Mamdani.'
How did such repulsive, unfit, morally depraved people rise to high and in such copious numbers? It's the one-party state which rewards crapulence, which favors the unfit.

 

[Votto]

There's a reason why Democrats have been so persistently enflamed by Fidel Castro and his failed communist regime in Cuba.
It's a one-party state. And its rule is permanent. The island has been ruled continuously on this model for 66 years.
Wittingly or not, they are now advocating for the same model to be imposed on the United States of America.
Top political operative James Carville, who has organized many successful elections, is saying the quiet part out loud, according to legal affairs commentator Jonathan Turley

What they want is to deceive Americans into voting for them on the Abigail Spanberger model, and then let them have it, good and hard, once they ensconce themselves into power, securing their power and ending any consideration of free market ideas.
Inclusion? Not this time. Diversity? Not of ideas. Equity? Only in poverty.

And it would be a grotesque regime such as Fidel Castro ran, that of a small billionaire class required to be party-loyal or die, and a vast populace with neither money, nor power, nor even a right to associate around ideas. Spies would be omnipresent. There would be only fist-waving for the party glory, and the mass penury that speaks for itself. Corruption would be embedded within the system. The rich would be harvested by the state to nothing. The young and strong would flee. But unlike Cuba, there would be no state to flee to.

We already see a lot of that in one-party states such as California and Minnesota, where fraud is embedded in the system. and a kakistocracy rises to the top. Think: 'Swalwell,' 'Newsom,' 'Schiff,' 'Katie Porter,' 'Rob Bonta,' 'Tim Walz,' 'Keith Ellison,' 'J.B. Pritzker,' 'Kathy Hochul,' 'Zohran Mamdani.'
How did such repulsive, unfit, morally depraved people rise to high and in such copious numbers? It's the one-party state which rewards crapulence, which favors the unfit.

Get enough fraud into a system and there is no rooting it out, then those corrupt officials take over.

We have seen enough examples of this. Like Cuba, there is no hope for states like California now.

 

[IM2]

Another right-wing confession.

 

[Mac1958]

When a party gets voted out of power, the obvious thing to do is honestly look in the mirror.

Funny, they never seem to do that. They're far more likely to just make excuses.

 

[eagle7-31]

When a party gets voted out of power, the obvious thing to do is honestly look in the mirror.

Funny, they never seem to do that. They're far more likely to just make excuses.

Both parties do that to a certain degree, but the dems now are more of a political monolith.

 

[Eman623]

We already see a lot of that in one-party states such as California and Minnesota, where fraud is embedded in the system. and a kakistocracy rises to the top. Think: 'Swalwell,' 'Newsom,' 'Schiff,' 'Katie Porter,' 'Rob Bonta,' 'Tim Walz,' 'Keith Ellison,' 'J.B. Pritzker,' 'Kathy Hochul,' 'Zohran Mamdani.'
How did such repulsive, unfit, morally depraved people rise to high and in such copious numbers? It's the one-party state which rewards crapulence, which favors the unfit.

In the case of Swalwell, it's been an open secret for years in Washington that he was a sexual predator. I heard one theory that this made him controllable by the CA Dem party. They had the good on him and could destroy him at any moment, so you be a good little Fang-Fang-Bang-Bang and do what we tell you.

Very House of Cards-ish

 

[MarathonMike]

There's a reason why Democrats have been so persistently enflamed by Fidel Castro and his failed communist regime in Cuba.
It's a one-party state. And its rule is permanent. The island has been ruled continuously on this model for 66 years.
Wittingly or not, they are now advocating for the same model to be imposed on the United States of America.
Top political operative James Carville, who has organized many successful elections, is saying the quiet part out loud, according to legal affairs commentator Jonathan Turley

What they want is to deceive Americans into voting for them on the Abigail Spanberger model, and then let them have it, good and hard, once they ensconce themselves into power, securing their power and ending any consideration of free market ideas.
Inclusion? Not this time. Diversity? Not of ideas. Equity? Only in poverty.

And it would be a grotesque regime such as Fidel Castro ran, that of a small billionaire class required to be party-loyal or die, and a vast populace with neither money, nor power, nor even a right to associate around ideas. Spies would be omnipresent. There would be only fist-waving for the party glory, and the mass penury that speaks for itself. Corruption would be embedded within the system. The rich would be harvested by the state to nothing. The young and strong would flee. But unlike Cuba, there would be no state to flee to.

We already see a lot of that in one-party states such as California and Minnesota, where fraud is embedded in the system. and a kakistocracy rises to the top. Think: 'Swalwell,' 'Newsom,' 'Schiff,' 'Katie Porter,' 'Rob Bonta,' 'Tim Walz,' 'Keith Ellison,' 'J.B. Pritzker,' 'Kathy Hochul,' 'Zohran Mamdani.'
How did such repulsive, unfit, morally depraved people rise to high and in such copious numbers? It's the one-party state which rewards crapulence, which favors the unfit.

The Democrats have been sliding to the Left for decades, but Trump's two terms have accelerated the process. Their Party is dominated by anti-Americans. Jon Fetterman is the lone voice of reason and the Democrats hate him for it. He better be wearing Kevlar under that hoodie.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

There's a reason why Democrats have been so persistently enflamed by Fidel Castro and his failed communist regime in Cuba.
It's a one-party state. And its rule is permanent. The island has been ruled continuously on this model for 66 years.
Wittingly or not, they are now advocating for the same model to be imposed on the United States of America.
Top political operative James Carville, who has organized many successful elections, is saying the quiet part out loud, according to legal affairs commentator Jonathan Turley

What they want is to deceive Americans into voting for them on the Abigail Spanberger model, and then let them have it, good and hard, once they ensconce themselves into power, securing their power and ending any consideration of free market ideas.
Inclusion? Not this time. Diversity? Not of ideas. Equity? Only in poverty.

And it would be a grotesque regime such as Fidel Castro ran, that of a small billionaire class required to be party-loyal or die, and a vast populace with neither money, nor power, nor even a right to associate around ideas. Spies would be omnipresent. There would be only fist-waving for the party glory, and the mass penury that speaks for itself. Corruption would be embedded within the system. The rich would be harvested by the state to nothing. The young and strong would flee. But unlike Cuba, there would be no state to flee to.

We already see a lot of that in one-party states such as California and Minnesota, where fraud is embedded in the system. and a kakistocracy rises to the top. Think: 'Swalwell,' 'Newsom,' 'Schiff,' 'Katie Porter,' 'Rob Bonta,' 'Tim Walz,' 'Keith Ellison,' 'J.B. Pritzker,' 'Kathy Hochul,' 'Zohran Mamdani.'
How did such repulsive, unfit, morally depraved people rise to high and in such copious numbers? It's the one-party state which rewards crapulence, which favors the unfit.

Dems love commie/socialist/marxist stuff. Here's aoc using a little boy to push her marxist agenda. Roll comedy barn...............

 

[Blaster]

Democrats want big brother government that dictates how Americans should live.

 

[IM2]

Democrats want big brother government that dictates how Americans should live.

That's what you put in office. Republicans are doing what you blame the Democrats for.

 

[Augustine_]

that of a small billionaire class required to be party-loyal or die, and a vast populace with neither money, nor power, nor even a right to associate around ideas. Spies would be omnipresent. There would be only fist-waving for the party glory, and the mass penury that speaks for itself. Corruption would be embedded within the system.

Seems like you are perfectly describing MAGA right there

 

[IM2]

Seems like you are perfectly describing MAGA right there

These guys have zero self-awareness.

 

[eagle7-31]

Seems like you are perfectly describing MAGA right there

Just describing what some dems have been saying. Its your side that admires Cuba for example.

 

[Augustine_]

Just describing what some dems have been saying. Its your side that admires Cuba for example.

Wow so disliking how MAGA is starving Cuba and murdering patients in their hospitals with a blockade means I admire Cuba. You people are truly dumber than shit

 

[eagle7-31]

Wow so disliking how MAGA is starving Cuba and murdering patients in their hospitals with a blockade means I admire Cuba. You people are truly dumber than shit

Was referring in general terms, try reading for once.

 

[Augustine_]

Was referring in general terms, try reading for once.

Oh so you are inventing out of thin air that I admire Cuba instead of knowing anything I've ever said about it. Typical.

 

[schmidlap]

There's a reason why Democrats have been so persistently enflamed by Fidel Castro and his failed communist regime in Cuba.
It's a one-party state. And its rule is permanent. The island has been ruled continuously on this model for 66 years.
Wittingly or not, they are now advocating for the same model to be imposed on the United States of America.
Top political operative James Carville, who has organized many successful elections, is saying the quiet part out loud, according to legal affairs commentator Jonathan Turley

What they want is to deceive Americans into voting for them on the Abigail Spanberger model, and then let them have it, good and hard, once they ensconce themselves into power, securing their power and ending any consideration of free market ideas.
Inclusion? Not this time. Diversity? Not of ideas. Equity? Only in poverty.

And it would be a grotesque regime such as Fidel Castro ran, that of a small billionaire class required to be party-loyal or die, and a vast populace with neither money, nor power, nor even a right to associate around ideas. Spies would be omnipresent. There would be only fist-waving for the party glory, and the mass penury that speaks for itself. Corruption would be embedded within the system. The rich would be harvested by the state to nothing. The young and strong would flee. But unlike Cuba, there would be no state to flee to.

We already see a lot of that in one-party states such as California and Minnesota, where fraud is embedded in the system. and a kakistocracy rises to the top. Think: 'Swalwell,' 'Newsom,' 'Schiff,' 'Katie Porter,' 'Rob Bonta,' 'Tim Walz,' 'Keith Ellison,' 'J.B. Pritzker,' 'Kathy Hochul,' 'Zohran Mamdani.'
How did such repulsive, unfit, morally depraved people rise to high and in such copious numbers? It's the one-party state which rewards crapulence, which favors the unfit.

The GOP is right to be worried about the American electorate's undisputed preference for the Democratic Party in reaction to the multiple failures of Trumpery. Generic vote assessments, polls of Independents and Democrats, and dozens of special elections across the nation affirm the public sentiment that will be expressed in November.

 

[Lockback]

We already see a lot of that in one-party states such as California and Minnesota, where fraud is embedded in the system. and a kakistocracy rises to the top. Think: 'Swalwell,' 'Newsom,' 'Schiff,' 'Katie Porter,' 'Rob Bonta,' 'Tim Walz,' 'Keith Ellison,' 'J.B. Pritzker,' 'Kathy Hochul,' 'Zohran Mamdani.'
How did such repulsive, unfit, morally depraved people rise to high and in such copious numbers? It's the one-party state which rewards crapulence, which favors the unfit.

So well done.
All of it totally true.
Look at the 1-party Democrat states: all corrupt, all hopelessly upside down financially, all crime-ridden, all chasing wealth away from their states.
It's absolutely beyond me how any rational person can vote for that party of frauds and creeps.

 

[Moonglow]

There's a reason why Democrats have been so persistently enflamed by Fidel Castro and his failed communist regime in Cuba.
It's a one-party state. And its rule is permanent. The island has been ruled continuously on this model for 66 years.
Wittingly or not, they are now advocating for the same model to be imposed on the United States of America.
Top political operative James Carville, who has organized many successful elections, is saying the quiet part out loud, according to legal affairs commentator Jonathan Turley

What they want is to deceive Americans into voting for them on the Abigail Spanberger model, and then let them have it, good and hard, once they ensconce themselves into power, securing their power and ending any consideration of free market ideas.
Inclusion? Not this time. Diversity? Not of ideas. Equity? Only in poverty.

And it would be a grotesque regime such as Fidel Castro ran, that of a small billionaire class required to be party-loyal or die, and a vast populace with neither money, nor power, nor even a right to associate around ideas. Spies would be omnipresent. There would be only fist-waving for the party glory, and the mass penury that speaks for itself. Corruption would be embedded within the system. The rich would be harvested by the state to nothing. The young and strong would flee. But unlike Cuba, there would be no state to flee to.

We already see a lot of that in one-party states such as California and Minnesota, where fraud is embedded in the system. and a kakistocracy rises to the top. Think: 'Swalwell,' 'Newsom,' 'Schiff,' 'Katie Porter,' 'Rob Bonta,' 'Tim Walz,' 'Keith Ellison,' 'J.B. Pritzker,' 'Kathy Hochul,' 'Zohran Mamdani.'
How did such repulsive, unfit, morally depraved people rise to high and in such copious numbers? It's the one-party state which rewards crapulence, which favors the unfit.

A swing and a miss, Cuba is so 1960.

 

[Lockback]

A swing and a miss, Cuba is so 1960.

Communism never goes out of style. It's the perfect game for suckers.