Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
it is amazing how many fkheads exist to try and destroy another person with a man like Kavanaugh's record. fk you and anyone else who believes any of this shameful content. I have other thoughts, but I would get banned on here. If you can't post with any integrity, you should go to another message board. kavanaugh is not your punching bag. he is your nightmare.It is not consistent with what any other victim has alleged.
Her lack of memory amounts to a contradiction
It is in fact consistent with Ramirez’s story of Kavanaugh’s dick being out and coming in contact with her face.
Wrong
She never said it came in contact with her face she said Kavanaugh waved it near her face and she pushed it away.
The newest allegation is not even remotely similar
The newest allegation is that Some other guys pushed Kavanaughs penis into the hand of a woman who does not remember any of it
The newest allegation is that Someone else committed the offense against a woman and against Kavanaugh who is also a victim
It is radically different the details MATTER
So two stories of Kavanaugh's dick being out and about at parties is not like each other?
Are you serious??
Once again NO
In ramirez claim kavaniaugh waved it in her face and she brushed it away.
In the newst allegation someone else assaulted Kavanugh and pushed his dick into the hand of another victim who contradicts the story.
Once again the details matter. And they are vastly different.
The only similarity is he had his pants down. From there the stories are lightyears apart.
Once again, to say that multiple stories of Kavanaugh having his dick out at parties are vastly different is just plain nuts.
Once again, not-recollecting IS NOT DENIAL.
"An organization that leads the protest movement against President Trump’s judicial nominees and presents itself as grassroots is really the project of Arabella Advisors, a largely unknown, massively funded strategy company pushing the interests of wealthy leftist donors.
The Arabella firm manages four nonprofits: the New Venture Fund, Sixteen Thirty Fund, Windward Fund, and Hopewell Fund. These nonprofit entities play host to hundreds of groups and projects that promote interests and political movements strategically deployed in a long-term campaign to nudge the country to the left.
A central component of Arabella’s activism is opposition to Trump’s conservative judicial nominees. One Arabella-tied organization calling itself Demand Justice quickly thrust itself into the center of opposition to Trump’s Supreme Court pick Brett Kavanaugh. The Capital Research Center has explained that Demand Justice is actually a project of Arabella’s Sixteen Thirty Fund.
Even before Trump announced Kavanaugh as his nominee, Demand Justice, founded by former members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, committed to spending about $5 million to oppose the eventual pick."
Will the revelation that wealthy Leftist Extremists who want to force the country to the Left, who include former Hillary Clinton 2016 Presidential Campaign Members, and Leftist Counter-Intelligence / Propaganda-Pushing organizations like the N. Y. Times are engaged in a conspiracy / crusade to destroy Trump Judicial picks - like Kavanaugh - and rule through judicial activists because they can not get their agenda passed through Congress finally wake snowflakes up to the fact that they are being 'played', manipulated, HERDED to the Left by wealthy power-hungry Leftists, such as those who ran Hillary's campaign in 2016?
Or do you think snowflakes will shrug off / reject these discoveries and keep marching to the Leftist Socialist Democrat drum beat?
Unmasked: Secretive Arabella Advisors Really Behind ‘Grassroots’ Protest Movement Opposing Trump’s Judicial Nominees
the fact is there aren't seven witnesses. nope. try again loser. I will defend a decent man like Kavanaugh against evil shit like you!! you have absolutely nothing of any kind to even begin to discuss this matter personally like you have. what a fk with no integrity you are. I want you to pull photos for us to see asswipe! you act like your personally involved, post the photo of the event.Still waiting for that link to 7 people.......It is not consistent with what any other victim has alleged.
Her lack of memory amounts to a contradiction
It is in fact consistent with Ramirez’s story of Kavanaugh’s dick being out and coming in contact with her face.
Wrong
She never said it came in contact with her face she said Kavanaugh waved it near her face and she pushed it away.
The newest allegation is not even remotely similar
The newest allegation is that Some other guys pushed Kavanaughs penis into the hand of a woman who does not remember any of it
The newest allegation is that Someone else committed the offense against a woman and against Kavanaugh who is also a victim
It is radically different the details MATTER
So two stories of Kavanaugh's dick being out and about at parties is not like each other?
Are you serious??
I gave the link earlier.
Oopsie. NY Times Corrects Hit Piece on Kavanaugh
during a ten-month investigation, the Times found that Ramirez’s allegations were corroborated by at least seven people, and uncovered an account of a parallel incident: A former Yale classmate named Max Stier says he witnessed Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different dorm party, and that his friends had pushed his penis into a female student’s hands.
They weren't all first hand witnesses, but they did contaporaniously hear about the incident.
so you think the democrats should support all the big money donor right wing groups, who are pushing their hateful agenda towards the working man... (so wrongfully called) conservative causes?
so you think the democrats should support all the big money donor right wing groups, who are pushing their hateful agenda towards the working man... (so wrongfully called) conservative causes?
lol"An organization that leads the protest movement against President Trump’s judicial nominees and presents itself as grassroots is really the project of Arabella Advisors, a largely unknown, massively funded strategy company pushing the interests of wealthy leftist donors.
The Arabella firm manages four nonprofits: the New Venture Fund, Sixteen Thirty Fund, Windward Fund, and Hopewell Fund. These nonprofit entities play host to hundreds of groups and projects that promote interests and political movements strategically deployed in a long-term campaign to nudge the country to the left.
A central component of Arabella’s activism is opposition to Trump’s conservative judicial nominees. One Arabella-tied organization calling itself Demand Justice quickly thrust itself into the center of opposition to Trump’s Supreme Court pick Brett Kavanaugh. The Capital Research Center has explained that Demand Justice is actually a project of Arabella’s Sixteen Thirty Fund.
Even before Trump announced Kavanaugh as his nominee, Demand Justice, founded by former members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, committed to spending about $5 million to oppose the eventual pick."
Will the revelation that wealthy Leftist Extremists who want to force the country to the Left, who include former Hillary Clinton 2016 Presidential Campaign Members, and Leftist Counter-Intelligence / Propaganda-Pushing organizations like the N. Y. Times are engaged in a conspiracy / crusade to destroy Trump Judicial picks - like Kavanaugh - and rule through judicial activists because they can not get their agenda passed through Congress finally wake snowflakes up to the fact that they are being 'played', manipulated, HERDED to the Left by wealthy power-hungry Leftists, such as those who ran Hillary's campaign in 2016?
Or do you think snowflakes will shrug off / reject these discoveries and keep marching to the Leftist Socialist Democrat drum beat?
Unmasked: Secretive Arabella Advisors Really Behind ‘Grassroots’ Protest Movement Opposing Trump’s Judicial Nominees
but there isn't anyone who confirms it. all made up shit by Max Stein, a past WhiteWater lawyer arguing against kavanaugh. hmmmmmm strange how that fking works eh?It is in fact consistent with Ramirez’s story of Kavanaugh’s dick being out and coming in contact with her face.
Wrong
She never said it came in contact with her face she said Kavanaugh waved it near her face and she pushed it away.
The newest allegation is not even remotely similar
The newest allegation is that Some other guys pushed Kavanaughs penis into the hand of a woman who does not remember any of it
The newest allegation is that Someone else committed the offense against a woman and against Kavanaugh who is also a victim
It is radically different the details MATTER
So two stories of Kavanaugh's dick being out and about at parties is not like each other?
Are you serious??
Once again NO
In ramirez claim kavaniaugh waved it in her face and she brushed it away.
In the newst allegation someone else assaulted Kavanugh and pushed his dick into the hand of another victim who contradicts the story.
Once again the details matter. And they are vastly different.
The only similarity is he had his pants down. From there the stories are lightyears apart.
Once again, to say that multiple stories of Kavanaugh having his dick out at parties are vastly different is just plain nuts.
Once again, not-recollecting IS NOT DENIAL.
Not recollecting a significant incident like this is in fact a contradictionand refutation of the claim. ANd yes it is denying that she was a vic tim as alleged.
Once again they are only similar if you stop at the part about having his pants down and his penios out.
You are willfully ignoring the rest of the crucial details which are vastly different.
are you personally involved in this matter? you sure act as if you held kavanaugh's dick. so, you were there? you should contact the times and let them know your revelry with kavanaugh and Ramirez.Wrong
She never said it came in contact with her face she said Kavanaugh waved it near her face and she pushed it away.
The newest allegation is not even remotely similar
The newest allegation is that Some other guys pushed Kavanaughs penis into the hand of a woman who does not remember any of it
The newest allegation is that Someone else committed the offense against a woman and against Kavanaugh who is also a victim
It is radically different the details MATTER
So two stories of Kavanaugh's dick being out and about at parties is not like each other?
Are you serious??
Once again NO
In ramirez claim kavaniaugh waved it in her face and she brushed it away.
In the newst allegation someone else assaulted Kavanugh and pushed his dick into the hand of another victim who contradicts the story.
Once again the details matter. And they are vastly different.
The only similarity is he had his pants down. From there the stories are lightyears apart.
Once again, to say that multiple stories of Kavanaugh having his dick out at parties are vastly different is just plain nuts.
Once again, not-recollecting IS NOT DENIAL.
Not recollecting a significant incident like this is in fact a contradictionand refutation of the claim.
Bullshit. Not recollecting is not contradictory evidence.
NOT having been handed a dick is at least as memmorable as having been handed a dick, sop "she don't remember" by some friends is just a denial to comment.
I can very definetively say I have never been handed a dick and god knows I drank way more than I should have on many not-recent occasions.
you were there?Still waiting for that link to 7 people.......Wrong
She never said it came in contact with her face she said Kavanaugh waved it near her face and she pushed it away.
The newest allegation is not even remotely similar
The newest allegation is that Some other guys pushed Kavanaughs penis into the hand of a woman who does not remember any of it
The newest allegation is that Someone else committed the offense against a woman and against Kavanaugh who is also a victim
It is radically different the details MATTER
So two stories of Kavanaugh's dick being out and about at parties is not like each other?
Are you serious??
I gave the link earlier.
Oopsie. NY Times Corrects Hit Piece on Kavanaugh
during a ten-month investigation, the Times found that Ramirez’s allegations were corroborated by at least seven people, and uncovered an account of a parallel incident: A former Yale classmate named Max Stier says he witnessed Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different dorm party, and that his friends had pushed his penis into a female student’s hands.
They weren't all first hand witnesses, but they did contaporaniously hear about the incident.
That is not a list
It is claim without corroboration or names.
The newest allegation is radically different and not parallel as has been proven
Nope, the story is very similar - drunk Bret with his dick out.
You are not saying anything that makes me think otherwise.
no witness testimony, I thought we already went over that? how far you going with this loser?It is not consistent with what any other victim has alleged.
Her lack of memory amounts to a contradiction
It is in fact consistent with Ramirez’s story of Kavanaugh’s dick being out and coming in contact with her face.
Wrong
She never said it came in contact with her face she said Kavanaugh waved it near her face and she pushed it away.
The newest allegation is not even remotely similar
The newest allegation is that Some other guys pushed Kavanaughs penis into the hand of a woman who does not remember any of it
The newest allegation is that Someone else committed the offense against a woman and against Kavanaugh who is also a victim
It is radically different the details MATTER
So two stories of Kavanaugh's dick being out and about at parties is not like each other?
Are you serious??
What proof do you have? The former Clinton lawyer? I did see your link or the names of the seven witnesses either, you must of forgot.
Ummm witness testimony - I though we went over that?
Just because he worked at one time as Clinton's lawyer doesn't mean he is a false witness.
And even if you are inclined to belive that he is lying, how to explain FBI not interested in interviewing him at the time they had to do a background check?
unless you were there, all you are doing is posting fake shit on a message board and getting your ass kicked for it.It most certianly is as there is no validity without the crucial victim agreeing to the allegation.Once again NO
In ramirez claim kavaniaugh waved it in her face and she brushed it away.
In the newst allegation someone else assaulted Kavanugh and pushed his dick into the hand of another victim who contradicts the story.
Once again the details matter. And they are vastly different.
The only similarity is he had his pants down. From there the stories are lightyears apart.
Once again, to say that multiple stories of Kavanaugh having his dick out at parties are vastly different is just plain nuts.
Once again, not-recollecting IS NOT DENIAL.
Not recollecting a significant incident like this is in fact a contradictionand refutation of the claim.
Bullshit. Not recollecting is not contradictory evidence.
NOT having been handed a dick is at least as memmorable as having been handed a dick, sop "she don't remember" by some friends is just a denial to comment.
I can very definetively say I have never been handed a dick and god knows I drank way more than I should have on many not-recent occasions.
Um no it is not as memorable as most men and women do not get a dick pushed into their hands at parties every day. To do so is bvery memorable for just about anyone and a person who does not remember this event is in fact massively refuting the allegation which is weak to begin with.
Her friends claimign she does not remember the incident is in fact a massive piece of contradictory evidence against the allegation.
No it isn't.
You've had long enough life probably...do you have a problem remembering if anyone put a dick in your hand?
The ony people who would, were either handling a lot of dicks, or maybe remember being handed a dick but can't recall who's dick it was exactly. Niether contradicts witness account that it was Bret and his dick.
how?The witness testimony IS the allegation and is not evidence..Wrong
She never said it came in contact with her face she said Kavanaugh waved it near her face and she pushed it away.
The newest allegation is not even remotely similar
The newest allegation is that Some other guys pushed Kavanaughs penis into the hand of a woman who does not remember any of it
The newest allegation is that Someone else committed the offense against a woman and against Kavanaugh who is also a victim
It is radically different the details MATTER
So two stories of Kavanaugh's dick being out and about at parties is not like each other?
Are you serious??
What proof do you have? The former Clinton lawyer? I did see your link or the names of the seven witnesses either, you must of forgot.
Ummm witness testimony - I though we went over that?
Just because he worked at one time as Clinton's lawyer doesn't mean he is a false witness.
And even if you are inclined to belive that he is lying, how to explain FBI not interested in interviewing him at the time they had to do a background check?
You want a dick pic from the 80's or it didn't happen?
Yes it is evidence.
ah the irony there.It most certianly is as there is no validity without the crucial victim agreeing to the allegation.Not recollecting a significant incident like this is in fact a contradictionand refutation of the claim.
Bullshit. Not recollecting is not contradictory evidence.
NOT having been handed a dick is at least as memmorable as having been handed a dick, sop "she don't remember" by some friends is just a denial to comment.
I can very definetively say I have never been handed a dick and god knows I drank way more than I should have on many not-recent occasions.
Um no it is not as memorable as most men and women do not get a dick pushed into their hands at parties every day. To do so is bvery memorable for just about anyone and a person who does not remember this event is in fact massively refuting the allegation which is weak to begin with.
Her friends claimign she does not remember the incident is in fact a massive piece of contradictory evidence against the allegation.
No it isn't.
You've had long enough life probably...do you have a problem remembering if anyone put a dick in your hand?
The ony people who would, were either handling a lot of dicks, or maybe remember being handed a dick but can't recall who's dick it was exactly. Niether contradicts witness account that it was Bret and his dick.
Yes it absolutely is a refutationand contradiction
I don't remember if I took a shit in the morning yesterday.
Is that a refutation of my wife's recollection that I did OR if she had recollection that I did not?
You are saying it is, I'm saying you are crazy.
yes it was.But it wasn’t uncovered during the Ford fiascoThis is why most Americans will crawl naked over broken glass next November to vote for the guy we really don’t want as President.
They completely fabricated the entire story.
It’s all about smear.
View attachment 279531
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ts_outrageous_smear_of_justice_kavanaugh.html
what would be over? what did they miss? you're very confused, your TDS is obscuring your intelligence at the moment.If your fuckedc up cheating rapist protecting party had a real investigation, it would be over.Except such does not delegitimize any rulings whatsoever.Liberals are continuing to go after Kavanaugh to delegitimize future SCOTUS rulings that don't go their way.
The entire smear campaign is utterly asinine.
stand up humor now? wow, get another job.Like you know shit & worship the pervert. You know nothing about these women yet you call them liars.dude, you have absolutely no integrity whatsoever. wow. we note your disdain for a person you know fking absolutely nothing about!!! just a shame people like you exist.This is why most Americans will crawl naked over broken glass next November to vote for the guy we really don’t want as President.
They completely fabricated the entire story.
It’s all about smear.
View attachment 279531
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ts_outrageous_smear_of_justice_kavanaugh.html
So Kavanaugh's dick was so fucking small it was not worthy of being remembered.
Having a little dick is not a free pass for assault.
I know he was accused of sexual assault by a reputable woman.
I know we have new allegations to go along with others.
From Kavanaugh's ridiculous testimony, I believe these allegations.
Um no
His accuser was not reputable and had a political motive,
The new allegation does not even implicate Kavanaugh in any assault it implicates OTHER men.
The accuser is a well renowned professor who wanted to let people know what kind of person Kananaugh was.
I understand. You never could get a woman to so humping their leg is justified.
but if the victim says not the guy, then the eye witness is disregarded. you should really do a better hack job. you suck at it.The witness testimony IS the allegation and is not evidence..What proof do you have? The former Clinton lawyer? I did see your link or the names of the seven witnesses either, you must of forgot.
Ummm witness testimony - I though we went over that?
Just because he worked at one time as Clinton's lawyer doesn't mean he is a false witness.
And even if you are inclined to belive that he is lying, how to explain FBI not interested in interviewing him at the time they had to do a background check?
You want a dick pic from the 80's or it didn't happen?
Yes it is evidence.
No it is not evidence it is an allegation
And just to settle the general quesiton of witness testimony being or not being evidence:
18 U.S. Code § 3502.Admissibility in evidence of eye witness testimony
The testimony of a witness that he saw the accused commit or participate in the commission of the crime for which the accused is being tried shall be admissible in evidence in a criminal prosecution in any trial court ordained and established under article III of the Constitution of the United States.
18 U.S. Code § 3502 - Admissibility in evidence of eye witness testimony
what's the crime and how do you prove it without a victim. you have a crime scene and no one there. wow, nice job, hack job 101 course is doing well today.Because therre is crime without a witness. You & Trump & Kavanaugh.Yes, your party has set back women’s protections decades with all of the insane lies.One of the worst parts of this nasty, toxic environment is that believing an accuser is getting more and more difficult.
it did come up during the investigation. where were you?I have to admit, that is a peculiar situation. During the whole time kavanaugh was being investigated, and during the hearings, this allegation never surfaced, now, out of the blue, it comes up.But it wasn’t uncovered during the Ford fiascoThis is why most Americans will crawl naked over broken glass next November to vote for the guy we really don’t want as President.
They completely fabricated the entire story.
It’s all about smear.
View attachment 279531
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ts_outrageous_smear_of_justice_kavanaugh.html
One would wonder why. It's not like the kavanaugh confirmation was held in secret. The whole country knew, and this steir guy knew as well. Why did he wait?
prove they didn't. let's see your evidence? dude, you leaped off the cliff today. you left any ounce of dignity you once had at the office, cause you are truly showing your hateful self here. pttthI have to admit, that is a peculiar situation. During the whole time kavanaugh was being investigated, and during the hearings, this allegation never surfaced, now, out of the blue, it comes up.But it wasn’t uncovered during the Ford fiascoThis is why most Americans will crawl naked over broken glass next November to vote for the guy we really don’t want as President.
They completely fabricated the entire story.
It’s all about smear.
View attachment 279531
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...ts_outrageous_smear_of_justice_kavanaugh.html
One would wonder why. It's not like the kavanaugh confirmation was held in secret. The whole country knew, and this steir guy knew as well. Why did he wait?
Because FBI did not do due deligence in the background check, THATS WHY. Republicans defined which leads they are to check out and which ones not to.
