Oopsie. NY Times Corrects Hit Piece on Kavanaugh

[jc456]

"Not recollecting is not contradictory evidence."

Yes it is. No victim, no crime.

But there are victims. Kavanaugh's children.

the message board protects the creepy insane in here, those kids are forever damaged. and these fkwads in here are all culpable

 

[jc456]

Everyone takes a shit on a frequent basis.

Very very few people have a penis pushed into their hands at a party..

Taking a shit is normal and not memorable being acosted by a penis at a party is memorable.

You are now defeating yourself with a false equivelancy.

NOT being acosted by a penus at a party is JUST AS MEMORABLE.

Again is there ANYONE here in this thread that is unsure about having been handed a stranger's dick at some point in your life?

Wrong,

It is normal to NOT be acosted by a penis at a party therefore it is NOT as memorable.

Do you have any trouble at all remembering that you never had a cock handed to you.

Don't lie now.

Not one bit which is why it is not meorable at all to NOT have one handed to you.

It woudl be enormously memorable had it ever happened which is why her claim that she does not remember the incident is a massive refutation and contradictory piece of evidence to the allegation

Stop dodging the question - it's very simple and goes straight to the issue. Just answer it.

you're truly a fkwad in here, you really do intend to flush all dignity away. wow. what a shameful man you are.

Such a statement by you is unjustified and undeserving a response. sick fk is all you are.

 

[Silent Warrior]

The NYT has stopped being relevant since we stopped using outhouses.

 

[Care4all]

so you think the democrats should support all the big money donor right wing groups, who are pushing their hateful agenda towards the working man... (so wrongfully called) conservative causes?

Before democrats turned Judicial Nominations into the Battle of Stalingrad, both RBG and Scalia each got 90+ Senators voting for them.

Let that sink in

it was REPUBLICANS that turned it in to a ''battle'' and cause to only place Federalists on the supreme court...

YOU started the battle!!! you you you did that, silly one....

 

[jc456]

They did in fact do the due dilligance in multiple background checks.

This guys story is contradictory implausible and absurd and not worth any time as it is falling apart as you spin like Tonya Harding trying eke a little credbility for it

Why didn't they interview this guy? Coons referred his testimony.

It doesn't add up to due dilligence.

I just said why and it does not add up to lack of due dilligance.

You said bullshit. FBI did not follow up on Max's story in any shape or form.

I stated facts.

It is a worthless,and implausible story unsupported by any evidencde and refuted by one of the two victims. Maybe both victims if Kavanugh ever comments which he likely wont

It is supported by witness and collaborating testimony, no victim is refuting testimony.

no it isn't, you just posted more fake shit. bye bye integrity as i said.

 

[jc456]

I just said why and it does not add up to lack of due dilligance.

You said bullshit. FBI did not follow up on Max's story in any shape or form.

I stated facts.

It is a worthless,and implausible story unsupported by any evidencde and refuted by one of the two victims. Maybe both victims if Kavanugh ever comments which he likely wont

It is supported by witness and collaborating testimony, no victim is refuting testimony.

No it is not

There is absolutely zero corroborating testimony and no corroborating witnersses.

You are stating a bald faced like in contradiction of the known facts AGAIN.

Yes one of the victims refutes it the other has nothing to say

There are seven corraborating accounts to Ramirez's story.

no there isn't and i challenge you to post it. NOW.

 

[Care4all]

so you think the democrats should support all the big money donor right wing groups, who are pushing their hateful agenda towards the working man... (so wrongfully called) conservative causes?

...try to stay on topic, snowflake....

I was on topic my dear.... responding to this portion of his post...


because they can not get their agenda passed through Congress finally wake snowflakes up to the fact that they are being 'played', manipulated, HERDED to the Left by wealthy power-hungry Leftists, such as those who ran Hillary's campaign in 2016?

Or do you think snowflakes will shrug off / reject these discoveries and keep marching to the Leftist Socialist Democrat drum beat?

 

[jc456]

It was clear, concise and articulate and an absolute anseer you dishonest fool.

NOT ONE BIT'

is a clear concise and articulate answer even if we habve rpoven you are a iar and uneducated fool who does not grasp clear english

Asked and answered and your idiotic spin is a massive failure.

So - NO,

you have absolutely no problem remembering that you never had a dick handed to you, so why do you think this person can't remember, such a memorable thing as NOT ahving had a cock handed to her?

The reason I have no probllem remembering it never happened is because it never happened and would only be memorable if it did.

She has no memory of gthe alleged iincident which refutes the allegation because she would remmeber it if it happened,

Day too day normal occurences are not memorable. Abnormal events are memorable.

Lack of abnormal events is NOT memorable.

For you it is VERY memorable that dick handing didn't happen to you. Weird huh? Considering you keep saying it wouldn't be.

Wrong.

It would be memorable only if it happened which si true for anyone.

It is not memorable when I do not get punched out because it seldom happens.

It only becoomes memorable if it does

Saying you do not rememeber something happeniing is a refuation that it did.

You really need to develop a better grasp of logic.

..except it is very memorable to you that you never had a cock handed.

You can dance around that all you want to but it's just not credible, by an example of your own memmory.

I bet you have unicorn's running around your yard eh?

 

[jc456]

It was clear, concise and articulate and an absolute anseer you dishonest fool.

NOT ONE BIT'

is a clear concise and articulate answer even if we habve rpoven you are a iar and uneducated fool who does not grasp clear english

Asked and answered and your idiotic spin is a massive failure.

So - NO

You have absolutely no problem remembering that you never had a dick handed to you, so why do you think this person can't remember, such a memorable thing as NOT having had a cock handed to her?

Because it didn’t happen.

Actually it did happen - he never had a dick handed and remembers that suprisingly clearly, considering his claims that it not happening wouldn't be memmorable.

The alleged woman that he claimed happen to said she didn’t recall.

Well not her personally, but her freinds said she didn't recall.

But there was someone that DID claim to recall what happened and her not remembering does not constitute a condradiction to that claim.

I don't know anyone not being able to recall being or not being handed a cock. Do you?

I can say definetively that it didn't happen at any party or dorm I've ever been to and so can Soupnazi and so can you I'll presume.

I can say definitely it didn't happen too.

 

[jc456]

The alleged woman that he claimed happen to said she didn’t recall.

Well not her personally, but her freinds said she didn't recall.

But there was someone that DID calim to recall what happened and her not remembering does not constitute a condradiction to that claim.

I don't know anyone not being able to recall being or not being handed a cock. Do you?

I can say definetively say that it didn't happen at any party or dorm I've ever been to and so can Soupnazi and so can you.

No, so it’s possible Clinton’s lawyer made it up.

It's also possible that he rapes kittens in his spare time, whats your point?

FBI did not follow up on his story AT ALL, which seems weird considering other similar claim they would be checking out in Brets background check.

That is normal because his story is a baseless allegation with no corroborating witness or evidence and it is contradicted by one of the victims.

Conclusion, therefore evidence.

Good job dummy.

post the evidence. sounds like you were there, was it yours maybe?

 

[jc456]

SCOTUS now has two sexual perverts on the bench. Sad...

prove that or you're slandering SCOTUS and I will report you!! that was made with intent.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

so you think the democrats should support all the big money donor right wing groups, who are pushing their hateful agenda towards the working man... (so wrongfully called) conservative causes?

Before democrats turned Judicial Nominations into the Battle of Stalingrad, both RBG and Scalia each got 90+ Senators voting for them.

Let that sink in

it was REPUBLICANS that turned it in to a ''battle'' and cause to only place Federalists on the supreme court...

YOU started the battle!!! you you you did that, silly one....

Bullshit!

It started with Kennedy's Jihad on Clarence Thomas!

 

[AntonToo]

It is in fact consistent with Ramirez’s story of Kavanaugh’s dick being out and coming in contact with her face.

Wrong

She never said it came in contact with her face she said Kavanaugh waved it near her face and she pushed it away.

The newest allegation is not even remotely similar

The newest allegation is that Some other guys pushed Kavanaughs penis into the hand of a woman who does not remember any of it


The newest allegation is that Someone else committed the offense against a woman and against Kavanaugh who is also a victim

It is radically different the details MATTER

So two stories of Kavanaugh's dick being out and about at parties is not like each other?

Are you serious??

Still waiting for that link to 7 people.......

I gave the link earlier.

Oopsie. NY Times Corrects Hit Piece on Kavanaugh

during a ten-month investigation, the Times found that Ramirez’s allegations were corroborated by at least seven people, and uncovered an account of a parallel incident: A former Yale classmate named Max Stier says he witnessed Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different dorm party, and that his friends had pushed his penis into a female student’s hands.

They weren't all first hand witnesses, but they did contaporaniously hear about the incident.

Ahh anonymous uncorroborated statements and you believe them. Not first hand you mean some of the 7 were repeating what someone else told them, ya thats good for a laugh. Lets accuse someone of something cause I heard Joe tell Ralph he saw it.

Whatever, don't belive any of them them, they are all lying about the same thing....but even then FBI not even looking at the second allegation referred to them during the background check is eyebrow raising.

 

[Hellokitty]

Liberals are continuing to go after Kavanaugh to delegitimize future SCOTUS rulings that don't go their way.

Except such does not delegitimize any rulings whatsoever.

The entire smear campaign is utterly asinine.

If your fuckedc up cheating rapist protecting party had a real investigation, it would be over.

what would be over? what did they miss? you're very confused, your TDS is obscuring your intelligence at the moment.

Interesting how democrats are quick to trash the "fine men and women of the FBI".

 

[jc456]

Liberals are continuing to go after Kavanaugh to delegitimize future SCOTUS rulings that don't go their way.

Except such does not delegitimize any rulings whatsoever.

The entire smear campaign is utterly asinine.

If your fuckedc up cheating rapist protecting party had a real investigation, it would be over.

what would be over? what did they miss? you're very confused, your TDS is obscuring your intelligence at the moment.

Interesting how democrats are quick to trash the "fine men and women of the FBI".

that so rightly got Russia russia right on, correct? these folks are fkwads, each and everyone of them. They are the lowest life form beetles have a better hygiene.

 

[jc456]

Wrong

She never said it came in contact with her face she said Kavanaugh waved it near her face and she pushed it away.

The newest allegation is not even remotely similar

The newest allegation is that Some other guys pushed Kavanaughs penis into the hand of a woman who does not remember any of it


The newest allegation is that Someone else committed the offense against a woman and against Kavanaugh who is also a victim

It is radically different the details MATTER

So two stories of Kavanaugh's dick being out and about at parties is not like each other?

Are you serious??

Still waiting for that link to 7 people.......

I gave the link earlier.

Oopsie. NY Times Corrects Hit Piece on Kavanaugh

during a ten-month investigation, the Times found that Ramirez’s allegations were corroborated by at least seven people, and uncovered an account of a parallel incident: A former Yale classmate named Max Stier says he witnessed Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different dorm party, and that his friends had pushed his penis into a female student’s hands.

They weren't all first hand witnesses, but they did contaporaniously hear about the incident.

Ahh anonymous uncorroborated statements and you believe them. Not first hand you mean some of the 7 were repeating what someone else told them, ya thats good for a laugh. Lets accuse someone of something cause I heard Joe tell Ralph he saw it.

Whatever, don't belive any of them them, they are all lying about the same thing....but even then FBI not even looking at the second allegation referred to them during the background check is eyebrow raising.

yep, they are all lying, who is they anyway?

 

[easyt65]

so you think the democrats should support all the big money donor right wing groups, who are pushing their hateful agenda towards the working man... (so wrongfully called) conservative causes?

...try to stay on topic, snowflake....

I was on topic my dear.... responding to this portion of his post...


because they can not get their agenda passed through Congress finally wake snowflakes up to the fact that they are being 'played', manipulated, HERDED to the Left by wealthy power-hungry Leftists, such as those who ran Hillary's campaign in 2016?

Or do you think snowflakes will shrug off / reject these discoveries and keep marching to the Leftist Socialist Democrat drum beat?

The Topic is about the Wealthy Leftist Donors behind the deplorable assault on Kavanaugh and Trump's Judge nominees. 'Right Wing Groups' was pulled out of your ass, off topic, and used in an attempt to derail discussion about what the criminal Left is doing NOW....

DESPITE the NY Times being exposed as a complete and undeniable political 'assassination attempt' of Kavanaugh, it is being reported, as well, that Democrats are actually drafting up legislation for Kavanaugh's Impeachment.

This article and the NY Times being so completely busted with theirs proves the only thing Kavanaugh is 'guilty' of is defeating the criminal, hate-driven Leftists...AGAIN...and that is not an Impeachable offense.

 

[easyt65]

...proving everything they do is based on pure hate and debunked fake news propaganda....



OUT FOR JUSTICE
‘Squad’ member preps House resolution for Kavanaugh impeachment
‘Squad’ member Pressley pushing Kavanaugh impeachment inquiry, despite allegation concerns

"Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., one of the four freshman congresswomen known collectively as the “Squad,” is planning Tuesday to introduce a resolution seeking an impeachment inquiry into Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, despite reluctance from top Democrats to pursue one and concerns about the basis for the latest accusations.

The resolution follows a New York Times report that included a new allegation of sexual misconduct from when Kavanaugh was in college -- although an editors' note later revealed that the alleged victim did not recall it taking place."

Pressley should be Censured for such an obvious political attack, using Congress - and the tax payers' time and money- to do so based on a completely debunked / proven false narrative!

 

[easyt65]

Trump-hating criminal Democrats are not allowing reality / exposed truth to stop them from spreading the false accusation against Kavanaugh ... despite the NY Times having already come out to admit their 1st release of the article was an intentionally political hit that left the facts which destroyed their story out altogether...

Scarborough goes after Kamala Harris for pushing Kavanaugh impeachment despite badly 'botched' NYT story

Scarborough goes after Kamala Harris for pushing Kavanaugh impeachment despite badly 'botched' NYT story

"MSNBC host Joe Scarborough was left baffled Tuesday by Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., using a now-revised New York Times story to argue for the impeachment of Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

"Even the most liberal of liberals are scratching their heads over how badly The New York Times botched that," Scarborough said.

Trump-hating Leftist Extremists are not even trying to hide their desperate attempt to take down both the President and Kavanaugh, to the point they are willing to openly push an admitted LIE by the NY Times as their justification for calling for Impeachment.

 

[Meathead]

Skanks don't let facts impede them.