Not surprisingly, Obama nailed it.

[struth]

https://fpa.org/did-iran-ever-actually-violate-the-nonproliferation-treaty-does-it-matter/

Yes? As your link says in 2004 Iran was working to come in comp

However, signed but unratified treaties may create a legal obligation to refrain from acts that defeat the treaty's purpose, and non-binding instruments (like declarations) can create political commitments or reflect customary law

Executive Agreements: In the US, the president may enter into agreements that do not require Senate ratification, which can be legally binding under international law,

May? Hahaha

 

[postman]

Did not intend. Because he told infidels he did not intend.
While spending hundreds of billions.
Sure.

DURR

The proof is in the pudding.

Iran ever built a nuke for the last 35 years, where they were just weeks or months away from doing so.

A woman is 9 months away from having a child. But if after 35 years of not having children, you can conclude she doesn't intend to have children.

Capiche?

 

[struth]

As of March 2026, the G7 and EU maintain a price cap on Russian sea-borne crude oil and petroleum products to restrict Moscow's war funding while keeping global energy flowing. The mechanism, updated in 2026, sets the cap at 15% lower than the average market price

As of February 1, 2026, a new dynamic price cap mechanism for Russian crude oil will be implemented, setting the cap at $44.10 per barrel. This cap is designed to ensure it remains 15% below the average market price of Urals crude oil, which is recalculated every 22 weeks. The mechanism aims to constrain Russia's energy revenues while maintaining market stability and is subject to regular review by the EU Commission.

So there is still a cap on Russian oil

 

[struth]

Cite?

I don’t have one since Obama never sent it to Congress ratify

Articles - State Department: Iran Deal Is Not ‘Legally Binding’ and Iran Didn’t Sign It (Joel Gehrke)

Human Rights Voices » Nuclear Weapons » State Department: Iran Deal Is Not ‘Legally Binding’ and Iran Didn’t Sign It

hrvoices.org

 

[BlindBoo]

War between Iraq and Iran is the same thing as Iranian terror attacks against civilians?

We not only provided material support for Saddam to kill Iranians with conventional weapons but we also sold missiles to Iran to kill Iraqis during the same war. Some might consider that war profiteering. I think one could call the attack on Halabja's civilians a terror attack. Didn't we blame Iran and continue to support Iraq after that? Do you think we haven't had covert attacks against the Theocratic state during their 47 year reign?

 

[postman]

So there is still a cap on Russian oil

Nope.
They can sell it at $110 a barrel, when it went that high.
Same with Venezuela and Iran.

 

[postman]

I don’t have one since Obama never sent it to Congress ratify

Articles - State Department: Iran Deal Is Not ‘Legally Binding’ and Iran Didn’t Sign It (Joel Gehrke)

Human Rights Voices » Nuclear Weapons » State Department: Iran Deal Is Not ‘Legally Binding’ and Iran Didn’t Sign It

hrvoices.org

Yet they complied with it.
Even AFTER Trump withdrew from it.

 

[struth]

Nope.
They can sell it at $110 a barrel, when it went that high.
Same with Venezuela and Iran.

Why wouldn’t we allow Venezuela to do that now? Trump arrested medurro

Iran pumping out a lot of oil right now?? Hahaha

 

[struth]

Yet they complied with it.
Even AFTER Trump withdrew from it.

No they didn’t


What’s more important is they broke the legally binding NPT

 

[Calypso Jones]

We wouldn't be in these situations were it not for democrats.

 

[postman]

No they didn’t


What’s more important is they broke the legally binding NPT

Under the JCPOA Iran got rid of nearly all their highly enriched uranium, leaving them with an insufficient amount to make a nuclear bomb.
And their enrichment sites were under IAEA monitoring. even after Trump withdrew.

 

[postman]

We wouldn't be in these situations were it not for democrats.

Trump wants $200 Billion for the Iran war.

And an extra $500 Billion added to the defense budget.

Trump is running up more debt, faster.

October 1 marked the start of fiscal year 2026. The Congressional Budget Office projected a $1.7 trillion deficit (5.5% of GDP) for the fiscal year,

 

[struth]

Under the JCPOA Iran got rid of nearly all their highly enriched uranium, leaving them with an insufficient amount to make a nuclear bomb.
And their enrichment sites were under IAEA monitoring. even after Trump withdrew.

They were suppose to be monitored under the legally binding NPt

Which they violated repeatedly over the years

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The proof is in the pudding.

Iran ever built a nuke for the last 35 years, where they were just weeks or months away from doing so.

A woman is 9 months away from having a child. But if after 35 years of not having children, you can conclude she doesn't intend to have children.

Capiche?

Obviously. The regime has said they want to destroy Israel, want to nuke Israel.

Of course, you should believe their leader when he also says he didn't want to build a nuke.

Who wouldn't believe Islamic terrorist pudding?

 

[Anarchy666]

Obama literally bowed to the Ayatollah.
**** him. He's a traitor.

 

[Hafar1014]

To prevent them from building nukes. Trump killed that deal, and by all reports, it was working.

It was 6 months before the reelection and Obama need something he could brag about so we got the Iran deal. It was so poor even democrat refused to vote in support of it. The world knew Iran would never honor any deal especially from Red line in the sand Obama. So they played him and he played the country bragging about the deal. Iran continued their nuclear development. No surprise inspections were permitted. Irans program was spread all over the ountry making it impossible to inspect anyway.
BY all reports from who Obama apologists like you. Obama never had the balls or experience to manage foreign policy. He was so far out of his element he had no idea. Iran made an ass out of him and we all paid for his failure. Now Trump a real leader is fixing his mess

 

[BackAgain]

It delayed it for at least 15 years. Giving the next presidents time to make a bigger and better deal.

There is no disgusting pile of diseased pig shit which postman won’t lap right up.

Meanwhile, back here in the real world, it took a decisive and smart President to finally stop dilly dallying and to, instead, finally do what needed to be done.

Only chumps like Obumbler and Potato would accept any suggestion that a “deal”with the insane Iranian Islamofascist regime has any real world value.

 

[Captain Caveman]

After trump's ill-fated, reckless decision to withdraw from the JCPOA, eventually causing this war, he said he would negotiate a better deal. He failed. With the US imposing heavy economic sanctions on Iran, the offer of lifting sanctions being what brought it to the negotiating table in the first place, it announced it would withdraw from the agreement on May 8, 2019. Exactly 1 year after Don essentially killed it.

A timeline of tensions over Iran's nuclear program as talks with U.S. approach

Iran and the United States are due to hold new talks in Geneva on Thursday over Tehran's nuclear program.

www.pbs.org

In response, Obama made a prediction.

Trump says U.S. pulling out of ‘rotten’ nuclear deal​

The move makes good on Trump’s insistence that the deal was too generous, allowing Iran to keep a mostly dormant nuclear program that Trump said could quickly produce a nuclear bomb once the deal’s provisions expire in the middle of the next decade.

But it further strains relations with key European allies, who have spent months urging Trump to sustain the agreement. It also came over the opposition of China and Russia, which were also parties to the 2015 deal.

And it drew an unusual public rebuke from former President Barack Obama himself, who invoked the specter of military conflict.

“Without the [Iran deal], the United States could eventually be left with a losing choice between a nuclear-armed Iran or another war in the Middle East,” Obama said in a lengthy statement.

Many former Obama administration officials suspect that Trump’s decision was, in part personal — that he was motivated by a desire to gut Obama’s foreign policy legacy. Obama aides, including former Secretary of State John Kerry, spent years pushing sanctions and hundreds of hours painstakingly negotiating the deal over some 18 months, and Trump’s decision left some of them dejected.

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, meanwhile, said he had ordered his foreign minister to begin negotiating with other countries to salvage the deal, according to The Associated Press. He added that if those talks fail, Iran will once against enrich uranium “more than before … in the next weeks.”

But Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — a vociferous critic of the deal who calls Iran an existential threat to his country — praised Trump’s “bold decision.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/08/iran-responds-trump-nuclear-deal-573252

Naturally, trump apologists have made all manner of factually incorrect allegations about the agreement made in 2015 designed to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. They amount to nothing more than a parroting of trump's lies about the adequacy of the JCPOA. Ultimately, Obama's comments following the withdrawal have proven to be prescient. So too Hillary's comments about trump's lack of fitness to lead the nation. If only we had listened.

Obama trusted terrorists

And the alternative to Trump, Harris??? Just threaten Iran to behave or you'll send word salad over to cackle them into submission???

By all means laugh in derision at Trump, but look at the alternative. If you do, then you'll piss your pants with laughing. In politics you have to go with the least worst candidate, and believe you me, Harris was an utter utter disaster. Pardon the pun, America dodged a bullet not electing word salad.

 

[postman]

Obviously. The regime has said they want to destroy Israel, want to nuke Israel.

Of course, you should believe their leader when he also says he didn't want to build a nuke.

Who wouldn't believe Islamic terrorist pudding?

They never said they want to "nuke" Israel. Which is why the Supreme Leader didn't allow Iran to have a nuke, and become an imminent threat to Israel.

 

[berg80]

Obama trusted terrorists

And the alternative to Trump, Harris??? Just threaten Iran to behave or you'll send word salad over to cackle them into submission???

By all means laugh in derision at Trump, but look at the alternative. If you do, then you'll piss your pants with laughing. In politics you have to go with the least worst candidate, and believe you me, Harris was an utter utter disaster. Pardon the pun, America dodged a bullet not electing word salad.

Republicans in Congress are growing more anxious about the Trump administration’s handling of the war in Iran as their questions about its objectives and cost, including whether ground troops will be needed, go unanswered.

Several G.O.P. lawmakers emerged on Wednesday from classified briefings with Pentagon officials on Capitol Hill complaining that they had not received crucial details about the way forward. Their frustration came nearly a month into a conflict in which Republicans have given President Trump broad latitude to wage war with no congressional input, and resisted calling administration officials to provide a public accounting of what they are doing.

Representative Mike Rogers of Alabama, the Republican chairman of the Armed Services Committee, who attended one of the briefings on Wednesday, said senior officials had failed to provide basic details about the scope and direction of the military campaign.

“We want to know more about what’s going on,” an uncharacteristically irritated Mr. Rogers told reporters. “We’re just not getting enough answers.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/25/world/middleeast/republicans-congress-iran-war-trump.html

Why haven't there been hearings on the war?