Not surprisingly, Obama nailed it.

[struth]

https://fpa.org/did-iran-ever-actually-violate-the-nonproliferation-treaty-does-it-matter/

Yes? As your link says in 2004 Iran was working to come in comp

However, signed but unratified treaties may create a legal obligation to refrain from acts that defeat the treaty's purpose, and non-binding instruments (like declarations) can create political commitments or reflect customary law

Executive Agreements: In the US, the president may enter into agreements that do not require Senate ratification, which can be legally binding under international law,

May? Hahaha

 

[postman]

Did not intend. Because he told infidels he did not intend.
While spending hundreds of billions.
Sure.

DURR

The proof is in the pudding.

Iran ever built a nuke for the last 35 years, where they were just weeks or months away from doing so.

A woman is 9 months away from having a child. But if after 35 years of not having children, you can conclude she doesn't intend to have children.

Capiche?

 

[struth]

As of March 2026, the G7 and EU maintain a price cap on Russian sea-borne crude oil and petroleum products to restrict Moscow's war funding while keeping global energy flowing. The mechanism, updated in 2026, sets the cap at 15% lower than the average market price

As of February 1, 2026, a new dynamic price cap mechanism for Russian crude oil will be implemented, setting the cap at $44.10 per barrel. This cap is designed to ensure it remains 15% below the average market price of Urals crude oil, which is recalculated every 22 weeks. The mechanism aims to constrain Russia's energy revenues while maintaining market stability and is subject to regular review by the EU Commission.

So there is still a cap on Russian oil

 

[struth]

Cite?

I don’t have one since Obama never sent it to Congress ratify

Articles - State Department: Iran Deal Is Not ‘Legally Binding’ and Iran Didn’t Sign It (Joel Gehrke)

Human Rights Voices » Nuclear Weapons » State Department: Iran Deal Is Not ‘Legally Binding’ and Iran Didn’t Sign It

hrvoices.org

 

[BlindBoo]

War between Iraq and Iran is the same thing as Iranian terror attacks against civilians?

We not only provided material support for Saddam to kill Iranians with conventional weapons but we also sold missiles to Iran to kill Iraqis during the same war. Some might consider that war profiteering. I think one could call the attack on Halabja's civilians a terror attack. Didn't we blame Iran and continue to support Iraq after that? Do you think we haven't had covert attacks against the Theocratic state during their 47 year reign?

 

[postman]

So there is still a cap on Russian oil

Nope.
They can sell it at $110 a barrel, when it went that high.
Same with Venezuela and Iran.

 

[postman]

I don’t have one since Obama never sent it to Congress ratify

Articles - State Department: Iran Deal Is Not ‘Legally Binding’ and Iran Didn’t Sign It (Joel Gehrke)

Human Rights Voices » Nuclear Weapons » State Department: Iran Deal Is Not ‘Legally Binding’ and Iran Didn’t Sign It

hrvoices.org

Yet they complied with it.
Even AFTER Trump withdrew from it.