What's wrong with the courts?

[Woodznutz]

The courts often fight with each other. Cases are sent back and forth from higher to lower courts and vice versa. What the courts need to do is to send bad laws back the legislatures for revisions that will make them work.

 

[Crepitus]

What's wrong with the courts?​

Someone is trying to pack them fulla unqualified tRumpling loyalists.

 

[Oddball]

What's wrong with the courts?​

They're packed to the rafters with neo-Marxist political hacks, who believe that they make the law instead of being arbiters of it.

I'm here to help.

 

[JohnDB]

The courts often fight with each other. Cases are sent back and forth from higher to lower courts and vice versa. What the courts need to do is to send bad laws back the legislatures for revisions that will make them work.

If a law is drafted and conflicts with existing laws....its sent back to legislators to revise.
Judges are there to interpret the Laws written and administer the Law. The ONLY creative use of their office that once existed was in delivering severity of sentencing, fines, and etc. However legislation gave minimum and maximum sentencing guidelines to judges after the creativity was abused by Liberal Judges. (Extremely light sentences for guilty verdicts on heinous crimes) As a result, judges became more activist.


Activist Judges write laws on the bench. (Absolutely wrong) but occasionally necessary when legislatures fail to act despite several pleas (Brian A. settlement) Then there's cases where regulations essentially draft laws that they never had authority to draft. Such as when the BATF made silencers almost illegal or magazine size limited or stylistic choices for firearms regulated.

Then,
we have liberals....and even though a degree in Law is not a requirement for certain judicial appointments it's a good idea. So the Liberals tend to appoint judges who are truly unqualified to sit on the bench. KBJ on SCOTUS is a prime example....

The Senate usually just rubber stamps Govenor and Presidential nominees....sometimes not.
But sometimes some get through.

Then theres the Prosecutors or District Attorneys....an odd mix of elections and appointments. Prosecutors/DAs can by abuse of office create defacto laws by which cases they choose to prosecute or FAIL to prosecute. Which when later prosecuted by someone noticing the problems created by failing to prosecute becomes a debate. (Birthright citizenship by illegal aliens)

 

[Woodznutz]

If a law is drafted and conflicts with existing laws....its sent back to legislators to revise.
Judges are there to interpret the Laws written and administer the Law. The ONLY creative use of their office that once existed was in delivering severity of sentencing, fines, and etc. However legislation gave minimum and maximum sentencing guidelines to judges after the creativity was abused by Liberal Judges. (Extremely light sentences for guilty verdicts on heinous crimes) As a result, judges became more activist.


Activist Judges write laws on the bench. (Absolutely wrong) but occasionally necessary when legislatures fail to act despite several pleas (Brian A. settlement) Then there's cases where regulations essentially draft laws that they never had authority to draft. Such as when the BATF made silencers almost illegal or magazine size limited or stylistic choices for firearms regulated.

Then,
we have liberals....and even though a degree in Law is not a requirement for certain judicial appointments it's a good idea. So the Liberals tend to appoint judges who are truly unqualified to sit on the bench. KBJ on SCOTUS is a prime example....

The Senate usually just rubber stamps Govenor and Presidential nominees....sometimes not.
But sometimes some get through.

Then theres the Prosecutors or District Attorneys....an odd mix of elections and appointments. Prosecutors/DAs can by abuse of office create defacto laws by which cases they choose to prosecute or FAIL to prosecute. Which when later prosecuted by someone noticing the problems created by failing to prosecute becomes a debate. (Birthright citizenship by illegal aliens)

The whole 'justice' system is a mess.

 

[JohnDB]

The whole 'justice' system is a mess.

This is why conservative judges are necessary....not a choice.

Because if words dont mean anything anymore...then the consistency that has helped generate the oldest existing government in the History of mankind will fail. Anything and everything is legal depending upon the judicial mood. (Liberal judges in a nutshell)

most governments and cultures have disappeared....Jewish culture is the oldest. (Their government is new)

When the government fails....people die. Usually the frail go first and horribly. But people are selfish, greedy, and insensitive slobs. So they dont stop even when they see and know they are hurting others.

Will we survive the liberal judges appointed ? MAYBE.....only maybe.