How to keep some humans alive from a few people that WANTED to kill them...

It's not your business.
What is not my BUSINESS? I pay taxes.
Planned Parenthood donated the below to Democrats because Planned Parenthood makes money as the nation's largest single provider of abortions, yet it gets millions of dollars in federal funding .
Out of the $1.29 billion in total Planned Parenthood revenue, $553.7 million (nearly 50% ) came from the government reimbursing Planned Parenthood for providing medical services covered by programs such as Medicaid or from government grants from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

Planned Parenthood Action Fund Endorses Kamala Harris for President

THOSE are my tax dollars going to an organization's charter by their founder Margaret Sanger: "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,”

So why wouldn't Planned Parenthood PUSH to kill blacks using tax money I've paid!
Totally not a fallacy!
1) I pay taxes.
2) Tax money is paid to Planned Parenthood.
3) Planned Parenthood uses that money to kill black babies according to...
4) Planned Parenthood’s founder, Margaret Sanger, must join that list. In promoting birth control, she advanced a controversial "Negro Project," wrote in her autobiography about speaking to a Ku Klux Klan group and advocated for a eugenics approach to breeding for “the gradual suppression, elimination and eventual extinction, of defective stocks — those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.”

And you obviously are in favor of the extermination of the black communities!
 
It's not your business, little buddy. Butt out.
Or "Butt In" as an option instead of vaginal sex... Or oral, or hand jobs, or birth control, or choose better partners, or just be responsible humans who understand the act of sex and the potential consequences of sex. And I'm only referring to repeat offenders who use Abortion as a form of birth control. I think a good majority on both sides of the aisle, can agree certain reasons that an abortion is an option. But repeat abortions, should be minimized.
 
Those women who have abortions for only convenience sake, will live to regret it unless they are psychopaths, time will tell. Men should never date or marry a woman who has such a disregard for human life.
There are plenty of cases of mothers/parents who have no regard for their children post birth. I read an article not too long ago of a woman who went on vacation for a week and left her baby/toddler to die of starvation. Oh, here is an article: POS human.

 
There are plenty of cases of mothers/parents who have no regard for their children post birth. I read an article not too long ago of a woman who went on vacation for a week and left her baby/toddler to die of starvation. Oh, here is an article: POS human.

Totally agree with you and your position regarding this non-human-mother! Totally inhuman.
Totally IRRESPONSIBLE!
Yet this is such a rarity.
How many mothers tell me with your research that totally abandon their children such as this?

With 1,026,700 abortions in 2023, 43% by women who've had a previous abortion but obviously like the above mother never considered her responsibility to with a few minutes sexual pleasure the death of a human... even after having her first abortion!
441,000 abortions by women who had a previous abortion all because of a few moments of sexual pleasure!
 
Or "Butt In" as an option instead of vaginal sex... Or oral, or hand jobs, or birth control, or choose better partners, or just be responsible humans who understand the act of sex and the potential consequences of sex. And I'm only referring to repeat offenders who use Abortion as a form of birth control. I think a good majority on both sides of the aisle, can agree certain reasons that an abortion is an option. But repeat abortions, should be minimized.
Not your business.

Fetuses are not persons.

Eggs are not chickens.
 
Hey I don't disagree with your 3. point regarding SCOTUS as it is a population's point of view.
Consider this: about 10 percent of women in the United States — 6.1 million — have difficulty getting or staying pregnant. While not all women facing infertility will pursue adoption, a 2002 study by the Centers for Disease Control shows that more than half (57 percent) of women who use infertility services do consider adoption.
So if just 10% of the 6.1 million women would be compensated by the women that want to kill their baby, that would be over 600,0000 human lives that would be saved of the annual abortion of humans by irresponsible women who've already had one abortion or of the 1,026,700 abortions in 2023

with 60% by women with one or more prior abortions the humans that aren't killed or nearly 600,000 humans saved from being killed by women with prior abortion. These lives would be saved and living with a family.
Lets see if your attention span is longer than 8 seconds.

If you feel that the fetus is a person--a “human” as you said earlier, wouldn’t that mean that every American should be 9 months older than they are currently?
If not, why not?

Secondly, wouldn’t that mean that every pregnant woman (most of whom are women of color in inner cities) should be counted--at least--twice in the census? That will, of course, result in a great many more congressional districts in urban areas like Los Angeles, Seattle, New York City, Chicago, Miami, Houston, Dallas,Phoenix... largely Democratic Party strongholds.
If not, why not?

Please consider those questions and get back to us.
 
PETA would be demonstrating in the streets if we treated puppies or dolphins like we treat human beings. Democrats and lefties won't back off an inch in the abortion issue as long as they have mainstream media support. Who could leave a full term infant on a cold stainless table to die of neglect and malnutrition? Who in the world would want to witness the horrific partial birth abortion or late term abortion procedure where a viable infant is turned around in the birth canal to cause a breach birth where the feet come out first. The head is held inside the womb while the baby struggles. An incision is made in the back of the head and a tube is inserted to vacuum the brain tissue while the baby is still alive until the face shrinks and the corpse falls out. When a whistle blower team recorded Planned Parenthood agents selling human remains the system and the media went after the whistleblowers. The fix is in and the carnage goes on.
 
We do spay animals. We put down animals all the time.

whitehall, you are just goofy.
 
Lets see if your attention span is longer than 8 seconds.

If you feel that the fetus is a person--a “human” as you said earlier, wouldn’t that mean that every American should be 9 months older than they are currently?
If not, why not?

Secondly, wouldn’t that mean that every pregnant woman (most of whom are women of color in inner cities) should be counted--at least--twice in the census? That will, of course, result in a great many more congressional districts in urban areas like Los Angeles, Seattle, New York City, Chicago, Miami, Houston, Dallas,Phoenix... largely Democratic Party strongholds.
If not, why not?

Please consider those questions and get back to us.
healthmyths will you answer the questions?
 
AND so the "health of the woman" is not an issue according to your examples?
FACTS: pregnancy loss can occur before a person even knows that they are pregnant.
After an ultrasound detects a healthy heartbeat, the chance of pregnancy loss is significantly lower.
If a person knows about the pregnancy, the chance of loss is about 15%.
In the United States, a miscarriage describes the loss of a fetus that occurs before 20 weeks of gestation.
A stillbirth is a pregnancy loss that happens any time after 20 weeks of pregnancy.

The miscarriage rate for women ages 20 to 30 years old is 9 to 17%; for womenages 31 to 35, it's 20%. At age 40, the miscarriage rate is 40%, and on average, 80% of pregnancies in women ages 40 and older will end in miscarriage.

AND again though understandably you are personalizing the issue.
The issue is NOT the health of the mother... it is OK
Not the rape of the mother... not part of the equation.
The issue is women getting pregnant AGAIN after having an abortion because they were sexually motivated before they had protection. Are you the type of woman that would have casual sex without any protection?
That's irresponsible and you probably have had more than one abortion! YOU would be IRRESPONSIBLE!
She lies like a rug
 
healthmyths will you answer the questions?
Technically you are right.
But obviously you think "days"... "weeks"..."months"...etc is a modern day invention ...(wait a minute if I go too fast for your attention span...) But see minutes, hours, days, etc..
..From about 700 BCE the Babylonians began to develop a mathematical theory of astronomy, but the equally divided 12-constellation zodiac appears later about 500 BCE to correspond to their year of 12 months of 30 days each. Their base 60 fraction system which we still use today (degrees / hours, minutes and seconds) was much easier to calculate with than the fractions used in Egypt or Greece, and remained the main calculation tool for astronomers until after the 16th century, when decimal notation began to take over.
So that system has been around for at least 2700 years. OK???
Now again your attention span is getting short, I know.. so When did we first use the term "Fetus" regarding birth?

Baer, who helped popularize Christian Heinrich Pander's 1817 discovery of primary germ layers, laid the foundations of modern comparative embryology in his landmark two-volume work Über Entwickelungsgeschichte der Thiere (1828–37; “On the Development of Animals”).
So again for your attention span that's 207 years ago.
But you are right... we may need to change the date of birth to a more accurate measurement.
 
Technically you are right.
But obviously you think "days"... "weeks"..."months"...etc is a modern day invention ...(wait a minute if I go too fast for your attention span...) But see minutes, hours, days, etc..
..From about 700 BCE the Babylonians began to develop a mathematical theory of astronomy, but the equally divided 12-constellation zodiac appears later about 500 BCE to correspond to their year of 12 months of 30 days each. Their base 60 fraction system which we still use today (degrees / hours, minutes and seconds) was much easier to calculate with than the fractions used in Egypt or Greece, and remained the main calculation tool for astronomers until after the 16th century, when decimal notation began to take over.
So that system has been around for at least 2700 years. OK???
Now again your attention span is getting short, I know.. so When did we first use the term "Fetus" regarding birth?

Baer, who helped popularize Christian Heinrich Pander's 1817 discovery of primary germ layers, laid the foundations of modern comparative embryology in his landmark two-volume work Über Entwickelungsgeschichte der Thiere (1828–37; “On the Development of Animals”).
So again for your attention span that's 207 years ago.
But you are right... we may need to change the date of birth to a more accurate measurement.
giphy.gif


Its also completely unworkable since those on the bubble of being able to get social security will most likely decide to retire. Not sure how many people are going to retire but that is 270 days you want to add to everyone’s odometer. We birth about 8,000 people a day. Lets say that 5,000 are working and want to retire. Overnight with your complete and utter idiocy you’ll have over a million people retiring and eligible for benefits. Needless to say this will be a massive blow to the economy.

Anyway, I’ll take the extra 10-15 urban districts in the House though. Thanks.

You guys are weird.
 
giphy.gif


Its also completely unworkable since those on the bubble of being able to get social security will most likely decide to retire. Not sure how many people are going to retire but that is 270 days you want to add to everyone’s odometer. We birth about 8,000 people a day. Lets say that 5,000 are working and want to retire. Overnight with your complete and utter idiocy you’ll have over a million people retiring and eligible for benefits. Needless to say this will be a massive blow to the economy.

Anyway, I’ll take the extra 10-15 urban districts in the House though. Thanks.

You guys are weird.
Hey I insulted your attention span which is obvious.
But you are lying about me and that's not only dumb but as you are wont to be "irresponsible"!
 
I don't expect any of you illogical readers to comprehend much less have the attention span greater than 8.5 seconds so you can ignore.
But to those that have been struggling with the concept most Democrats support, i.e. the murder of innocent humans i.e. abortions for all here is an option that you may not be aware of by Planned Parenthood, i.e. the killing of humans crowd.
FACTS first:
60% of women who aborted their first pregnancy had an abortion of their second or more pregnancy.

Those women are guilty of murder.
Think about it... you approve idiocy on the part of women who already had 1 abortion NOT obviously understanding ....
they are murdering a human!
When will Democrats comprehend that these 60% of abortions are totally by irresponsible people who should be RESPONSIBLE!
They are killing humans because of their stupidity, etc.


THINK...
I can understand an abortion due to
  • health of the mother
  • or rape or
  • the 1st abortion.
BUT continuing to be ok (as Planned Parenthood is!!!) with 60% of abortions by grossly irresponsible women who carelessly have sex EVEN though they know they killed their first human, continue to have sex and many of the with unprotected sex is totally irresponsible!
And the men are also responsible if they are aware of the woman's proclivity to kill humans AFTER having her first abortion.

FOLKS 60% of abortions are by women who've had a previous abortion!

Are those of you on the fence regarding abortions, aware that 60% of humans killed are authorized by women who've had a previous abortion?

I truly don't understand people that have no problem with killing babies again and again, i.e. as 60% of abortions are by women with one or more previous abortion!

You people that are so aghast at Hitler's killing 6 million jews, are you aware that of the total abortions since 1973.. 63,459,781 abortions.
60% of the abortions by women with one or more previous abortions or
38,075,868 humans murdered because of irresponsible women and MEN!
Nearly 6 times the number of Hitler's killing of 6 million jews... and most people support that!


Currently, 63% say abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while 36% say it should be illegal in all or most cases.

SAD that I'm pretty confident that most of the 63% in favor of abortions don't know 60% of abortions are done by totally irresponsible women and men. Think... folks if we make it illegal to kill another human i.e. death penalty... why isn't there any penalty for women who irresponsibly have their 2nd or more abortion? WHY is that ok?
We kill people who are responsible for killing other people, but babies??
those women are not "guilty of murder."
your opinion is not law . well, anywhere that i know of.
not even texas.
 
those women are not "guilty of murder."
your opinion is not law . well, anywhere that i know of.
not even texas.
I agree with you "MY opinion is not law".
You, me and Trump along with millions of Americans AGREE with you!
The difference is your opinion is influenced by a group that was started with this objective...
"we want to exterminate the Negro population,”
I along with millions of Americans do not want that... do you?
 
Back
Top Bottom