Your quote was as follows from your own post:
"You're right, it would not have been one on one. They would have beat him to death instead of stopping it like those white guys did. He was lucky the guys he was giving shit to were compassionate enough to step in and save his sorry ass.
That never would have happened if the colors had been reversed."
This about as close to stating that a black person would not help a white person as you could probably get.
I don't happen to refer to people as "colors" but you understand the close similarity between what you stated and my alleged "misquote". I just did not word it as crudely as you did.
Furthermore, since "blacks hate whites as you have stated, why would a black person accompany a white person to a hospital in the middle of a racially based civil unrest situation with scores of people on the rampage?
That would probably be more risky than breaking up a one on one altercation.
Why would it be risky? Are you saying that the thugs would turn on their own for helping ******? Doesn't that kind of destroy your position that blacks don't hate whites?
Lol. Now you are talking in circles. And this is getting hilarious coming from an adult.
You know good and well what I am stating. In the middle of absolute chaos, Denny who is white was aided by a black person.
According to YOU blacks hate white people. Using your logic why would he have aided someone that he is supposed to hate?
You generalized by making a blanket statement that you have no proff of being true at all.
It is not incumbent upon me to explain how logical reasoning works to you.
Your thread. I cannot make it any simpler.