Donald Trump Lost In 2020. An Alarming Number Of His Nominees Won't Say So.

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
82,411
Reaction score
46,350
Points
2,605
Location
In a Republic, actually
Dozens of the president's court picks have refused to say Joe Biden fairly won in 2020. Now his executive nominees are avoiding the question, too.

‘It's a pretty simple question: Did Donald Trump lose the presidential election in 2020?

The answer is yes, clearly. Trump lost to Joe Biden.

Trump has always, to put it lightly, had difficulty accepting this basic fact. And refusing to acknowledge it now appears to be a basic condition for securing Trump's appointment to a powerful government post, with dozens of his nominees twisting themselves in knots to avoid saying he lost in 2020.

All 40 of his nominees to lifetime federal judgeships so far have given misleading or false responses to questions about the 2020 election in the Senate Judiciary Committee. Demand Justice, a progressive judicial advocacy group, has been analyzing judicial nominees' written responses to questions from senators on the panel and found they are nearly identical in their strangely worded, evasive characterizations of the election.

All have been directly asked by the committee, "Did Donald Trump lose the 2020 election?" Instead of just saying yes, they have either pointed to Biden's "certification" by Congress or said Biden "served" as president. Both responses allow them to skip the part about Biden actually winning the election and move on to him simply becoming president.

This is the same tactic Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill have long used to avoid publicly contradicting Trump's lies about the 2020 election.’


Cowards shouldn’t be Federal judges; blind partisan Trump Cult members shouldn’t be Federal judges; individuals so dishonest shouldn’t be Federal judges.

This is both bizarre and alarming, conservativism at its worst and most reprehensible.
 
Everyone knows Trump won in 2020... that was the driving force for his re election.... people will not stand for rigged elections democrats... you had better learn or lear that soon.....
Rigged elections is how you get learing centers.

If it wasn't for fraud and harvesting mills, democrats wouldn't win anywhere.

Democrats = traitors
 
He beat both the guy and the gal that won in 2020 four years later. How do you explain that?
 
Dozens of the president's court picks have refused to say Joe Biden fairly won in 2020. Now his executive nominees are avoiding the question, too.

‘It's a pretty simple question: Did Donald Trump lose the presidential election in 2020?

The answer is yes, clearly. Trump lost to Joe Biden.

Trump has always, to put it lightly, had difficulty accepting this basic fact. And refusing to acknowledge it now appears to be a basic condition for securing Trump's appointment to a powerful government post, with dozens of his nominees twisting themselves in knots to avoid saying he lost in 2020.

All 40 of his nominees to lifetime federal judgeships so far have given misleading or false responses to questions about the 2020 election in the Senate Judiciary Committee. Demand Justice, a progressive judicial advocacy group, has been analyzing judicial nominees' written responses to questions from senators on the panel and found they are nearly identical in their strangely worded, evasive characterizations of the election.

All have been directly asked by the committee, "Did Donald Trump lose the 2020 election?" Instead of just saying yes, they have either pointed to Biden's "certification" by Congress or said Biden "served" as president. Both responses allow them to skip the part about Biden actually winning the election and move on to him simply becoming president.

This is the same tactic Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill have long used to avoid publicly contradicting Trump's lies about the 2020 election.’


Cowards shouldn’t be Federal judges; blind partisan Trump Cult members shouldn’t be Federal judges; individuals so dishonest shouldn’t be Federal judges.

This is both bizarre and alarming, conservativism at its worst and most reprehensible.
 


I've watched quite a few of these hearings for judicial nominations.

There's a LOT of grandstanding, a lot of asking loaded questions and a lot of Republican nominees saying the exact same thing, as if they've been coached (because they've been coached).

But most of it is just "meh".

But this, these judicial nominees refusing to say that Trump cannot run again for president under the Constitution as it stands now.

They're doing this because they know it would be the death of their career (in the next three years, at least) to say what Trump does not want them to say, which is that he can't run again.

Trump has said and done a lot of dangerous things to US democracy (which is very fragile due to the FPTP system and the money). His attacks on the media and free speech, his corruption, etc.

But this is so blatant that he's forcing these people to essentially say the Constitution doesn't matter, the USA doesn't matter, only TRUMP matters.

That's a sign of a man pushing for a DICTATORSHIP.
 
grasp-straws.gif
 
Trump can run again.
Trump is actually able to be in office for 5 terms if he wants.

Also, the Commie laws Dems have created over the decades won't keep Trump from being in office.
If WE THE PEOPLE vote him in office, then THAT is how he STAYS in office.
 

How worrying is it when Republican judges will not say that Trump is not eligible to run for president again?​


Three negatives in one sentence if you count worrying as a negative .

Is it a competition for us to work out what actually happened ?

Now I am worried . I have no idea.
 
Trump can run again.
Trump is actually able to be in office for 5 terms if he wants.

Also, the Commie laws Dems have created over the decades won't keep Trump from being in office.
If WE THE PEOPLE vote him in office, then THAT is how he STAYS in office.
I see you don't like the Constitution.

So if Trump took your guns away, you would cheer too, right?
 
Three negatives in one sentence if you count worrying as a negative .

Is it a competition for us to work out what actually happened ?

Now I am worried . I have no idea.
Worrying is not a negative.

Perhaps, instead of trying to count to three, you discuss the topic. Might be a sticker in it for you. Mommy will be happy.
 
You poor deluded idiots of the Democrat party....

There's going to be a Republican candidate running for office in 2 years....currently is highly favored to win against EVERY candidate the Democrats have to offer.

Currently the Democrat favorite is Kamala. She is ahead of Gavin in the polls. Both of these are at the bottom by far comparison of the Republican candidate's numbers.

But we dont talk about the presidential election cycle until mid-terms are over. And currently with the gerrymandering getting sorted at the moment....it looks like Republicans are going to retain the House by 12 seats and Senate by at least 4. (And going more red by the presidential election time unless Democrats radically change their agenda)

It's not looking good for Democrats....

The judges silence?
One: they have zero jurisdiction to say anything
Two: they have no reason to clarify a hypothetical question and tons of reasons not to.
Three: Trump appointed judges actually know how to do their jobs unlike progressives
Four: Trump asked them to say "nuthin to nobody".
 
15th post
No more worrisome than all the other horrendous sh*t the ruling class is doing.

After all, since when do they abide by the Constitution?
 


I've watched quite a few of these hearings for judicial nominations.

There's a LOT of grandstanding, a lot of asking loaded questions and a lot of Republican nominees saying the exact same thing, as if they've been coached (because they've been coached).

But most of it is just "meh".

But this, these judicial nominees refusing to say that Trump cannot run again for president under the Constitution as it stands now.

They're doing this because they know it would be the death of their career (in the next three years, at least) to say what Trump does not want them to say, which is that he can't run again.

Trump has said and done a lot of dangerous things to US democracy (which is very fragile due to the FPTP system and the money). His attacks on the media and free speech, his corruption, etc.

But this is so blatant that he's forcing these people to essentially say the Constitution doesn't matter, the USA doesn't matter, only TRUMP matters.

That's a sign of a man pushing for a DICTATORSHIP.

its more worrying that you people believe an 80 year old guy in 3 years will run again...
 
So people want modifications and pass laws, the violate 1st, 2nd, 4th, 14th and several other parts of the Constitution but now they go full alert on this one and claim it just terrible?

First I don’t think Trump will seek a third term, I think it is just more leftwing nuts stirring the pot, secondly Republicans other than Trump will run, thirdly, The people will not vote him in, lastly the Constitution would not let him back.

Just a dumb thread to begin with. Citizens have bigger worries than this, like living every day wanting to make sure they have food, clothing, shelter, job security, government not trying to overreach, government not trying to force inequitable policies, forcing unconstitutional laws that violate their freedoms, like the Patriot Act, the forced vaccines, taking away guns, taking away religious freedoms, taking away their right to raise their families, applying laws unequally, and on and on.

It is obvious that some people have too much time and bigotry on their hands and use it to think irrationally.
 
Back
Top Bottom