XponentialChaos
Diamond Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 31,798
- 11,562
- 1,285
Your delicate ego isn’t, liar.I'm okay Lumpy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your delicate ego isn’t, liar.I'm okay Lumpy.
Whatever you say Lumpy.Your delicate ego isn’t, liar.
Whatever you say Lumpy.
If you want the last word just type "Last word" and we'll leave it at that. It requires a little more thought than selecting an emoji but I'm confident you can do that much.
Right. And “Whatever you say Lumpy” takes a whole lot of thought from you.If you want the last word just type "Last word" and we'll leave it at that. It requires a little more thought than selecting an emoji but I'm confident you can do that much.
My point is, I didn’t assume anything before the trial. You did.
You didn’t have an opinion on whether Chauvin killed Floyd or not?
And still not a single response to this lie of yours.No, I didn’t. I usually reserve judgment until more info comes out. Especially in cases like this when woke imbeciles want to hang someone just to make a point, rather than waste any time on guilt or innocence.
Right. And “Whatever you say Lumpy” takes a whole lot of thought from you.
I already told you, you lost.
Says the idiot whose idea of original thought and expression is little cartoons.You exposed yourself as a liar. Believe me when I say I have no problem watching you continue to try to squirm out of addressing your proven lie. If you want to continue to embarrass yourself, then by all means, continue.![]()
Bullshit. No, it doesn’t.It takes more than a stupid emoji, that's for sure.
And calling someone Lumpy is a super intelligent retort to your proven lie. Lmao.This country is dissolving into virtual illiteracy and your stupid ass is pushing it right along.
The debate. You’re unable to explain why you’re more likely to be correct about the cause of death than the medical examiner, because that’s completely fucking retarded. And then you exposed yourself as a liar. You lost.Lost what? The debate about Floyd's death was not settled either way.
Right. Because original thought really just means calling the other person Lumpy over and over. You’re a fucking idiot. Here’s another cartoon so you can keep crying at me over them.Says the idiot whose idea of original thought and expression is little cartoons.
Yeah, okay Lumpy.
Sure thing, Lumpy.
I'm okay Lumpy.
Ooooooh such impressive arguments that took so much thought and effort. So original.Whatever you say Lumpy.
Bullshit. No, it doesn’t.
And calling someone Lumpy is a super intelligent retort to your proven lie. Lmao.
The debate. You’re unable to explain why you’re more likely to be correct about the cause of death than the medical examiner, because that’s completely fucking retarded. And then you exposed yourself as a liar. You lost.
Who's crying? You're the idiot using the damn things, not me.Right. Because original thought really just means calling the other person Lumpy over and over. You’re a fucking idiot. Here’s another cartoon so you can keep crying at me over them.![]()
No it doesn’t. Calling someone Lumpy over and over takes no thought or effort.Yes, it does. It's the difference between choosing words or choosing a cartoon to speak for you.
Bullshit. You believe you’re more likely to be correct about the cause of death than the medical examiner.False. I never said I was more likely to be correct about the cause of death. You lose.
You. You’re whining about it. The fact that it bothers you isn’t my problem. Here’s another one for you.Who's crying? You're the idiot using the damn things, not me.
I'm afraid it takes more thought than an emoji.No it doesn’t. Calling someone Lumpy over and over takes no thought or effort.
Bullshit. You believe you’re more likely to be correct about the cause of death than the medical examiner.
Blah blah blah. You're a two-dimensional moron with zero critical thinking skills. Nothing of what you just said reflects my viewpoints on this matter. And nothing of what you said negates your hypocrisy of avoiding my questions after railing at me for not answering yours.On one hand, we have the competent medical examiner who says it was a homicide. On the other hand, we have you, a proven liar with no medical experience whatsoever, who can’t admit he’s wrong when he knows he’s wrong, and you say you believe the medical examiner is wrong. And you believe you’re more likely to be correct than him? Lmao. That sounds intelligent to you?! You’re an idiot and you fucking lost.
No it doesn’t.I'm afraid it takes more thought than an emoji.
Bullshit. You believe you’re more likely to be correct about the cause of death than the medical examiner.
Now you’re arguing that you believe you’re less likely to be correct about the cause of death than the medical examiner?!Bullshit. I never said any such thing and what's more, I told you the exact opposite many times.
All Chauvin did was step on a Cockroach.Everyone is entitled to an appeal.
Considering the fact that the venue had a poisoned jury pool and Floyd's advocates had burned the city already and threatened to do worse, tells me they should have had a change of venue to International Falls or some other location in Minnesota, for the defendant to have a fair chance.
Nope.Now you’re arguing that you believe you’re less likely to be correct about the cause of death than the medical examiner?!
The opposite of believing you’re more likely to be correct is believing you’re less likely to be correct, dumbass.Nope.
This vexes you because, as I said, you are two dimensional.
The opposite of believing you’re more likely to be correct is believing you’re less likely to be correct, dumbass.
I've already told you what I believe but you rejected my premise. So, what now?Which is it? You can’t even coherently state what you believe.