McConnell now supports Trump IMPEACHMENT

MadDog

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
800
Reaction score
426
Points
908
You like house charades, I see.
Are you still here. You said Trump wouldn’t be impeached. Was that a lie or just incredibly stupid? He was impeached again and you won’t even find QAnon claiming that he wasn’t.
 
OP
Lakhota

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
91,480
Reaction score
12,862
Points
2,220
Location
Native America
Is McConnell evolving? He won't say "incite" - but he is saying "provoke". Will he get to "incite"? We shall see...
 

OKTexas

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
52,061
Reaction score
10,961
Points
2,070
Location
Near Magnolia, TX

Do you only look at the picture when you get a book? Try reading the first paragraph (one of those thingies with words in it.

Heres some help.
“After the 2020 United States presidential election, the campaign for incumbent President Donald Trump and others filed and lost over 60 lawsuits[1][2][3][4][5] contesting election processes, vote counting, and the vote certification process in multiple states, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.[6]

if you look at my post, I didn’t limit the scope to Pennsylvania.

the page lists or references the 60 suits I was referring to.

"others" had nothing to do with what I said, did they? Fucking idiot.

.
All the parsing in the world wont change the fact that you were wrong and still are. Whether they were filed by Trump or on his behalf. He lost all but one.

The post says Trump AND others, not Trump OR others. Some suits on behalf included other litigants.

But read on to see for yourself. Stop parsing and start learning.

There were no parsing of words, I said neither Trump or his campaign filed that many suits, and they didn't. All you're doing is trying to shoehorn your lie into something plausible, here's a hint for ya commie, it ain't working.

.
“Out of the 62 lawsuits filed challenging the presidential election, 61 have failed, according to Elias.“

doesn’t get any clearer than that. SOMEBODY filed them. And they were all done in an attempt to benefit Trump.

Fuck off and die commie, already been addressed.

.
Your stupid fantasy got laughed out of court. Get as whiny and throw as many tantrums as you like.

You can fuck off and die as well you punk ass commie. Tell the class what courts actually heard the merits of the cases? Can you say one, the one Trump won.

.
 

MadDog

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
800
Reaction score
426
Points
908

Do you only look at the picture when you get a book? Try reading the first paragraph (one of those thingies with words in it.

Heres some help.
“After the 2020 United States presidential election, the campaign for incumbent President Donald Trump and others filed and lost over 60 lawsuits[1][2][3][4][5] contesting election processes, vote counting, and the vote certification process in multiple states, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.[6]

if you look at my post, I didn’t limit the scope to Pennsylvania.

the page lists or references the 60 suits I was referring to.

"others" had nothing to do with what I said, did they? Fucking idiot.

.
All the parsing in the world wont change the fact that you were wrong and still are. Whether they were filed by Trump or on his behalf. He lost all but one.

The post says Trump AND others, not Trump OR others. Some suits on behalf included other litigants.

But read on to see for yourself. Stop parsing and start learning.

There were no parsing of words, I said neither Trump or his campaign filed that many suits, and they didn't. All you're doing is trying to shoehorn your lie into something plausible, here's a hint for ya commie, it ain't working.

.
“Out of the 62 lawsuits filed challenging the presidential election, 61 have failed, according to Elias.“

doesn’t get any clearer than that. SOMEBODY filed them. And they were all done in an attempt to benefit Trump.

Fuck off and die commie, already been addressed.

.
Your stupid fantasy got laughed out of court. Get as whiny and throw as many tantrums as you like.

You can fuck off and die as well you punk ass commie. Tell the class what courts actually heard the merits of the cases? Can you say one, the one Trump won.

.
Do you even know the definition of Communism is, How about a LEGITIMATE definition. I suspect you'll have to look it up. You've been using it wrong all this time.
 

TheGreenHornet

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
3,935
Reaction score
1,812
Points
210
Just breaking on MSNBC. Below is The New York Times link. So, if true, will McConnell expedite Senate impeachment proceedings - or continue to drag his feet?

Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader, has told associates that he believes President Trump committed impeachable offenses and that he is pleased that Democrats are moving to impeach him, believing that it will make it easier to purge him from the party, according to people familiar with his thinking. The House is voting on Wednesday to formally charge Mr. Trump with inciting violence against the country.

Mr. McConnell, Republican of Kentucky, has indicated that he wants to see the specific article of impeachment that the House is set to approve on Wednesday, which is expected to draw support from as many as a dozen Republicans, potentially including Representative Liz Cheney of Wyoming, the party’s No. 3 in the House. But he has made clear in private discussions that he believes now is the moment to move on from the weakened lame duck, whom he blames for causing Republicans to lose the Senate.

McConnell is said to be pleased about impeachment, believing it will be easier to purge Trump from the G.O.P.
and you too Brutus?
and
 

MadDog

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
800
Reaction score
426
Points
908

He should have impeached five days ago, but was too cowardly to do it. It's obviously to McConnell's benefit to be for it now. But, make no mistake, he's not for it out of a concern for the country. At this point, it will benefit him. Oh no, what about my donors. :smiliehug:
They DID impeach last week. The trial is yet to come. McConnell probably delayed because now the Democratic majority will be able to write the rules for the trial.
 

MadDog

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
800
Reaction score
426
Points
908

Do you only look at the picture when you get a book? Try reading the first paragraph (one of those thingies with words in it.

Heres some help.
“After the 2020 United States presidential election, the campaign for incumbent President Donald Trump and others filed and lost over 60 lawsuits[1][2][3][4][5] contesting election processes, vote counting, and the vote certification process in multiple states, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.[6]

if you look at my post, I didn’t limit the scope to Pennsylvania.

the page lists or references the 60 suits I was referring to.

"others" had nothing to do with what I said, did they? Fucking idiot.

.
All the parsing in the world wont change the fact that you were wrong and still are. Whether they were filed by Trump or on his behalf. He lost all but one.

The post says Trump AND others, not Trump OR others. Some suits on behalf included other litigants.

But read on to see for yourself. Stop parsing and start learning.

There were no parsing of words, I said neither Trump or his campaign filed that many suits, and they didn't. All you're doing is trying to shoehorn your lie into something plausible, here's a hint for ya commie, it ain't working.

.
“Out of the 62 lawsuits filed challenging the presidential election, 61 have failed, according to Elias.“

doesn’t get any clearer than that. SOMEBODY filed them. And they were all done in an attempt to benefit Trump.

Fuck off and die commie, already been addressed.

.
Your stupid fantasy got laughed out of court. Get as whiny and throw as many tantrums as you like.

You can fuck off and die as well you punk ass commie. Tell the class what courts actually heard the merits of the cases? Can you say one, the one Trump won.

.
Whatsa matter. Can't get a faster definition of communism from Google? Or did you just realize that nobody here is actually advocating communism.
 

OKTexas

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
52,061
Reaction score
10,961
Points
2,070
Location
Near Magnolia, TX

Do you only look at the picture when you get a book? Try reading the first paragraph (one of those thingies with words in it.

Heres some help.
“After the 2020 United States presidential election, the campaign for incumbent President Donald Trump and others filed and lost over 60 lawsuits[1][2][3][4][5] contesting election processes, vote counting, and the vote certification process in multiple states, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.[6]

if you look at my post, I didn’t limit the scope to Pennsylvania.

the page lists or references the 60 suits I was referring to.

"others" had nothing to do with what I said, did they? Fucking idiot.

.
All the parsing in the world wont change the fact that you were wrong and still are. Whether they were filed by Trump or on his behalf. He lost all but one.

The post says Trump AND others, not Trump OR others. Some suits on behalf included other litigants.

But read on to see for yourself. Stop parsing and start learning.

There were no parsing of words, I said neither Trump or his campaign filed that many suits, and they didn't. All you're doing is trying to shoehorn your lie into something plausible, here's a hint for ya commie, it ain't working.

.
“Out of the 62 lawsuits filed challenging the presidential election, 61 have failed, according to Elias.“

doesn’t get any clearer than that. SOMEBODY filed them. And they were all done in an attempt to benefit Trump.

Fuck off and die commie, already been addressed.

.
Your stupid fantasy got laughed out of court. Get as whiny and throw as many tantrums as you like.

You can fuck off and die as well you punk ass commie. Tell the class what courts actually heard the merits of the cases? Can you say one, the one Trump won.

.
Do you even know the definition of Communism is, How about a LEGITIMATE definition. I suspect you'll have to look it up. You've been using it wrong all this time.

You can call yourself anything you wish, Marxist, Socialist, Communist, it all leads to the same place. You dear leader maobama was born to communist, raised by communist and mentored by a card carrying communist. When you suck his dick, you make your colors known. Own it commie.

.
 

XponentialChaos

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2018
Messages
8,725
Reaction score
2,939
Points
210
Uh oh. Turtle just might vote against Trump.

"The mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the President and other powerful people."

:popcorn:
 

MadDog

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
800
Reaction score
426
Points
908

Do you only look at the picture when you get a book? Try reading the first paragraph (one of those thingies with words in it.

Heres some help.
“After the 2020 United States presidential election, the campaign for incumbent President Donald Trump and others filed and lost over 60 lawsuits[1][2][3][4][5] contesting election processes, vote counting, and the vote certification process in multiple states, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.[6]

if you look at my post, I didn’t limit the scope to Pennsylvania.

the page lists or references the 60 suits I was referring to.

"others" had nothing to do with what I said, did they? Fucking idiot.

.
All the parsing in the world wont change the fact that you were wrong and still are. Whether they were filed by Trump or on his behalf. He lost all but one.

The post says Trump AND others, not Trump OR others. Some suits on behalf included other litigants.

But read on to see for yourself. Stop parsing and start learning.

There were no parsing of words, I said neither Trump or his campaign filed that many suits, and they didn't. All you're doing is trying to shoehorn your lie into something plausible, here's a hint for ya commie, it ain't working.

.
“Out of the 62 lawsuits filed challenging the presidential election, 61 have failed, according to Elias.“

doesn’t get any clearer than that. SOMEBODY filed them. And they were all done in an attempt to benefit Trump.

Fuck off and die commie, already been addressed.

.
Your stupid fantasy got laughed out of court. Get as whiny and throw as many tantrums as you like.

You can fuck off and die as well you punk ass commie. Tell the class what courts actually heard the merits of the cases? Can you say one, the one Trump won.

.
Do you even know the definition of Communism is, How about a LEGITIMATE definition. I suspect you'll have to look it up. You've been using it wrong all this time.

You can call yourself anything you wish, Marxist, Socialist, Communist, it all leads to the same place. You dear leader maobama was born to communist, raised by communist and mentored by a card carrying communist. When you suck his dick, you make your colors known. Own it commie.

.
If you don't know what it means, how can you spot one. But I knew you couldn't provide a definition. When you get called out, you turn into Deflection-Boy.

Afraid to answer a simple question? Are ALL Texans cowards like you.
 

Pegasus13

Rookie
Joined
Jan 19, 2021
Messages
12
Reaction score
24
Points
1
Location
Fredericksburg, Virginia
Just breaking on MSNBC. Below is The New York Times link. So, if true, will McConnell expedite Senate impeachment proceedings - or continue to drag his feet?

Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader, has told associates that he believes President Trump committed impeachable offenses and that he is pleased that Democrats are moving to impeach him, believing that it will make it easier to purge him from the party, according to people familiar with his thinking. The House is voting on Wednesday to formally charge Mr. Trump with inciting violence against the country.

Mr. McConnell, Republican of Kentucky, has indicated that he wants to see the specific article of impeachment that the House is set to approve on Wednesday, which is expected to draw support from as many as a dozen Republicans, potentially including Representative Liz Cheney of Wyoming, the party’s No. 3 in the House. But he has made clear in private discussions that he believes now is the moment to move on from the weakened lame duck, whom he blames for causing Republicans to lose the Senate.

McConnell is said to be pleased about impeachment, believing it will be easier to purge Trump from the G.O.P.
Congress should be ashamed of themselves, there's more important issues to be handled than another impeachment. Mitch!! Get my money!
 

OKTexas

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
52,061
Reaction score
10,961
Points
2,070
Location
Near Magnolia, TX

Do you only look at the picture when you get a book? Try reading the first paragraph (one of those thingies with words in it.

Heres some help.
“After the 2020 United States presidential election, the campaign for incumbent President Donald Trump and others filed and lost over 60 lawsuits[1][2][3][4][5] contesting election processes, vote counting, and the vote certification process in multiple states, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.[6]

if you look at my post, I didn’t limit the scope to Pennsylvania.

the page lists or references the 60 suits I was referring to.

"others" had nothing to do with what I said, did they? Fucking idiot.

.
All the parsing in the world wont change the fact that you were wrong and still are. Whether they were filed by Trump or on his behalf. He lost all but one.

The post says Trump AND others, not Trump OR others. Some suits on behalf included other litigants.

But read on to see for yourself. Stop parsing and start learning.

There were no parsing of words, I said neither Trump or his campaign filed that many suits, and they didn't. All you're doing is trying to shoehorn your lie into something plausible, here's a hint for ya commie, it ain't working.

.
“Out of the 62 lawsuits filed challenging the presidential election, 61 have failed, according to Elias.“

doesn’t get any clearer than that. SOMEBODY filed them. And they were all done in an attempt to benefit Trump.

Fuck off and die commie, already been addressed.

.
Your stupid fantasy got laughed out of court. Get as whiny and throw as many tantrums as you like.

You can fuck off and die as well you punk ass commie. Tell the class what courts actually heard the merits of the cases? Can you say one, the one Trump won.

.
Do you even know the definition of Communism is, How about a LEGITIMATE definition. I suspect you'll have to look it up. You've been using it wrong all this time.

You can call yourself anything you wish, Marxist, Socialist, Communist, it all leads to the same place. You dear leader maobama was born to communist, raised by communist and mentored by a card carrying communist. When you suck his dick, you make your colors known. Own it commie.

.
If you don't know what it means, how can you spot one. But I knew you couldn't provide a definition. When you get called out, you turn into Deflection-Boy.

Afraid to answer a simple question? Are ALL Texans cowards like you.

It's simple, un-American assholes like you. Do you remember the famous quote from Anita Dunn, quoting Mao? Guess who commie biden appointed to his staff, just like maobama before him.

.
 

MadDog

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
800
Reaction score
426
Points
908

Do you only look at the picture when you get a book? Try reading the first paragraph (one of those thingies with words in it.

Heres some help.
“After the 2020 United States presidential election, the campaign for incumbent President Donald Trump and others filed and lost over 60 lawsuits[1][2][3][4][5] contesting election processes, vote counting, and the vote certification process in multiple states, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.[6]

if you look at my post, I didn’t limit the scope to Pennsylvania.

the page lists or references the 60 suits I was referring to.

"others" had nothing to do with what I said, did they? Fucking idiot.

.
All the parsing in the world wont change the fact that you were wrong and still are. Whether they were filed by Trump or on his behalf. He lost all but one.

The post says Trump AND others, not Trump OR others. Some suits on behalf included other litigants.

But read on to see for yourself. Stop parsing and start learning.

There were no parsing of words, I said neither Trump or his campaign filed that many suits, and they didn't. All you're doing is trying to shoehorn your lie into something plausible, here's a hint for ya commie, it ain't working.

.
“Out of the 62 lawsuits filed challenging the presidential election, 61 have failed, according to Elias.“

doesn’t get any clearer than that. SOMEBODY filed them. And they were all done in an attempt to benefit Trump.

Fuck off and die commie, already been addressed.

.
Your stupid fantasy got laughed out of court. Get as whiny and throw as many tantrums as you like.

You can fuck off and die as well you punk ass commie. Tell the class what courts actually heard the merits of the cases? Can you say one, the one Trump won.

.
Do you even know the definition of Communism is, How about a LEGITIMATE definition. I suspect you'll have to look it up. You've been using it wrong all this time.

You can call yourself anything you wish, Marxist, Socialist, Communist, it all leads to the same place. You dear leader maobama was born to communist, raised by communist and mentored by a card carrying communist. When you suck his dick, you make your colors known. Own it commie.

.
If you don't know what it means, how can you spot one. But I knew you couldn't provide a definition. When you get called out, you turn into Deflection-Boy.

Afraid to answer a simple question? Are ALL Texans cowards like you.

It's simple, un-American assholes like you. Do you remember the famous quote from Anita Dunn, quoting Mao? Guess who commie biden appointed to his staff, just like maobama before him.

.
And the cowardice continues. Why are you so afraid of a simple definition? You use the term all the time. Why are you such a coward?

Are all Texans cowards like you?
 

OKTexas

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
52,061
Reaction score
10,961
Points
2,070
Location
Near Magnolia, TX

Do you only look at the picture when you get a book? Try reading the first paragraph (one of those thingies with words in it.

Heres some help.
“After the 2020 United States presidential election, the campaign for incumbent President Donald Trump and others filed and lost over 60 lawsuits[1][2][3][4][5] contesting election processes, vote counting, and the vote certification process in multiple states, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.[6]

if you look at my post, I didn’t limit the scope to Pennsylvania.

the page lists or references the 60 suits I was referring to.

"others" had nothing to do with what I said, did they? Fucking idiot.

.
All the parsing in the world wont change the fact that you were wrong and still are. Whether they were filed by Trump or on his behalf. He lost all but one.

The post says Trump AND others, not Trump OR others. Some suits on behalf included other litigants.

But read on to see for yourself. Stop parsing and start learning.

There were no parsing of words, I said neither Trump or his campaign filed that many suits, and they didn't. All you're doing is trying to shoehorn your lie into something plausible, here's a hint for ya commie, it ain't working.

.
“Out of the 62 lawsuits filed challenging the presidential election, 61 have failed, according to Elias.“

doesn’t get any clearer than that. SOMEBODY filed them. And they were all done in an attempt to benefit Trump.

Fuck off and die commie, already been addressed.

.
Your stupid fantasy got laughed out of court. Get as whiny and throw as many tantrums as you like.

You can fuck off and die as well you punk ass commie. Tell the class what courts actually heard the merits of the cases? Can you say one, the one Trump won.

.
Do you even know the definition of Communism is, How about a LEGITIMATE definition. I suspect you'll have to look it up. You've been using it wrong all this time.

You can call yourself anything you wish, Marxist, Socialist, Communist, it all leads to the same place. You dear leader maobama was born to communist, raised by communist and mentored by a card carrying communist. When you suck his dick, you make your colors known. Own it commie.

.
If you don't know what it means, how can you spot one. But I knew you couldn't provide a definition. When you get called out, you turn into Deflection-Boy.

Afraid to answer a simple question? Are ALL Texans cowards like you.

It's simple, un-American assholes like you. Do you remember the famous quote from Anita Dunn, quoting Mao? Guess who commie biden appointed to his staff, just like maobama before him.

.
And the cowardice continues. Why are you so afraid of a simple definition? You use the term all the time. Why are you such a coward?

Are all Texans cowards like you?

Since when are you commies so worried about definitions. You commies redefine terminology at will and make shit up as you go. If Mary can call herself Marty and you buy into it, you got no room to talk about definitions. You stop acting like a commie, I'll stop calling you one.

.
 

MadDog

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
800
Reaction score
426
Points
908

Do you only look at the picture when you get a book? Try reading the first paragraph (one of those thingies with words in it.

Heres some help.
“After the 2020 United States presidential election, the campaign for incumbent President Donald Trump and others filed and lost over 60 lawsuits[1][2][3][4][5] contesting election processes, vote counting, and the vote certification process in multiple states, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.[6]

if you look at my post, I didn’t limit the scope to Pennsylvania.

the page lists or references the 60 suits I was referring to.

"others" had nothing to do with what I said, did they? Fucking idiot.

.
All the parsing in the world wont change the fact that you were wrong and still are. Whether they were filed by Trump or on his behalf. He lost all but one.

The post says Trump AND others, not Trump OR others. Some suits on behalf included other litigants.

But read on to see for yourself. Stop parsing and start learning.

There were no parsing of words, I said neither Trump or his campaign filed that many suits, and they didn't. All you're doing is trying to shoehorn your lie into something plausible, here's a hint for ya commie, it ain't working.

.
“Out of the 62 lawsuits filed challenging the presidential election, 61 have failed, according to Elias.“

doesn’t get any clearer than that. SOMEBODY filed them. And they were all done in an attempt to benefit Trump.

Fuck off and die commie, already been addressed.

.
Your stupid fantasy got laughed out of court. Get as whiny and throw as many tantrums as you like.

You can fuck off and die as well you punk ass commie. Tell the class what courts actually heard the merits of the cases? Can you say one, the one Trump won.

.
Do you even know the definition of Communism is, How about a LEGITIMATE definition. I suspect you'll have to look it up. You've been using it wrong all this time.

You can call yourself anything you wish, Marxist, Socialist, Communist, it all leads to the same place. You dear leader maobama was born to communist, raised by communist and mentored by a card carrying communist. When you suck his dick, you make your colors known. Own it commie.

.
If you don't know what it means, how can you spot one. But I knew you couldn't provide a definition. When you get called out, you turn into Deflection-Boy.

Afraid to answer a simple question? Are ALL Texans cowards like you.

It's simple, un-American assholes like you. Do you remember the famous quote from Anita Dunn, quoting Mao? Guess who commie biden appointed to his staff, just like maobama before him.

.
And the cowardice continues. Why are you so afraid of a simple definition? You use the term all the time. Why are you such a coward?

Are all Texans cowards like you?

Since when are you commies so worried about definitions. You commies redefine terminology at will and make shit up as you go. If Mary can call herself Marty and you buy into it, you got no room to talk about definitions. You stop acting like a commie, I'll stop calling you one.

.
What are you afraid of? i don’t care what you call me, but it would be really nice if you had the courage to answer a question. If all you want to do is rant, fine. But it looks like you’ll always be a coward.

The Wizard of Oz had the Cowardly Lion. USMB has the Cowardly Texan.

But you aren’t the only one.
1611130447995.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Tipsycatlover

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2016
Messages
46,508
Reaction score
19,067
Points
2,330
The Right keeps talking about unity after this horrific attack on our country. You achieve unity be cutting off the head of the snake.
Well, we can't actually cut off the head of the democrat communist snake because President Xi is in China.
Do you have any idea just how stupid your comments make you appear?
Not at all, NAZI.
You see a nazi?
Nah. Just another communist.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top