2019 Trump impeachment documents declassified

[ColonelAngus]

Oh Boy: Tulsi Gabbard Just Declassified the Docs Behind the 2019 Trump Impeachment Effort

Tulsi Gabbard declassifies key documents exposing the 2019 Trump impeachment as a politically biased effort.

townhall.com

“newly declassified documents from the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, reveal that even this whistleblower’s colleagues were skeptical of the spy craft, despite supporting the impeachment effort. One of the witnesses, identified as “witness #2,” worked with disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok, who was one of the main figures behind the Russian collusion hoax, and co-authored the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, ordered by Barack Obama before leaving office, which was full of flawed information to support the collusion narrative.”
.
.
.
This is interesting.

Of course, it is ok if the impeachment was based on lies, because the Bad Orange man is Bad.

 

[forkup]

Oh Boy: Tulsi Gabbard Just Declassified the Docs Behind the 2019 Trump Impeachment Effort

Tulsi Gabbard declassifies key documents exposing the 2019 Trump impeachment as a politically biased effort.

townhall.com

“newly declassified documents from the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, reveal that even this whistleblower’s colleagues were skeptical of the spy craft, despite supporting the impeachment effort. One of the witnesses, identified as “witness #2,” worked with disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok, who was one of the main figures behind the Russian collusion hoax, and co-authored the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, ordered by Barack Obama before leaving office, which was full of flawed information to support the collusion narrative.”
.
.
.
This is interesting.

Of course, it is ok if the impeachment was based on lies, because the Bad Orange man is Bad.

You mean the effort that was based on a phone call that Trump released himself right?

So what was the lie? You are the third person who started a thread on this I've seen. Nobody seems to be able to answer what exactly you are alleging or why what happened is part of some conspiracy.

It was a Democrat who accused Trump seems a rather thin accusation, considering nobody is actually denying that Trump tried to blackmail Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden.

So what was the lie,

 

[ColonelAngus]

Certainly if evidence was manufactured or there were any impropriety in building the impeachment case, the public should know.

 

[forkup]

Certainly if evidence was manufactured or there were any impropriety in building the impeachment case, the public should know.

Sure, what evidence was manufactured? Again, Trump released the transcript of the phone call himself. Nobody is disputing what it says as far as I know.

 

[ColonelAngus]

I guess a review of the declassified files will answer many questions.

 

[Oddball]

 

[Alicia J]

I guess a review of the declassified files will answer many questions.

You guessed wrong.

We already know what was in Trump's phone call to Zelensky. That's why Trump was impeached. This is a stupid non-story.

 

[drudge X]

You guessed wrong.

We already know what was in Trump's phone call to Zelensky. That's why Trump was impeached. This is a stupid non-story.

Trump won.

 

[Seymour Flops]

It was a Democrat who accused Trump seems a rather thin accusation, considering nobody is actually denying that Trump tried to blackmail Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden.

I love how Democrats re-write history. It's amusing except that today's college students will be learning and then teaching our children and grandchildren these bald-faced lies.

Many, many people denied that Trump tried to "blackmail" Ukraine. and still deny it because it was never true. You're smarter than this, forkup.

The hearing proved it. Every witness who actually talked to Trump said he insisted "no quid pro quo." The only people who testified about quid pro quo were people who hated Trump and claimed that "it was known" that he was asking for quid pro quo.

The phone call that had the Dems once again doing the this-time-we-finally-got-him dance again turned out to be completely appropriate. Dems counted on the call being classified to allow them to lie about it, but they forgot who determines classification.

 

[Lockback]

I love how Democrats re-write history. It's amusing except that today's college students will be learning and then teaching our children and grandchildren these bald-faced lies.

Many, many people denied that Trump tried to "blackmail" Ukraine. and still deny it because it was never true. You're smarter than this, forkup.

The hearing proved it. Every witness who actually talked to Trump said he insisted "no quid pro quo." The only people who testified about quid pro quo were people who hated Trump and claimed that "it was known" that he was asking for quid pro quo.

The phone call that had the Dems once again doing the this-time-we-finally-got-him dance again turned out to be completely appropriate. Dems counted on the call being classified to allow them to lie about it, but they forgot who determines classification.

Brilliant post. Spot on target.

 

[Billiejeens]

View attachment 1244120

I think that those of "us" expecting criminal charges to be handed down need to make certain that we can identify crimes.

Was everything that the Democrats did to thwart Trump and The MAGA movement dirty, disgusting, reprehensible, underhanded, despicable, contemptible, vile, loathsome, morally detestable, shameful, abhorrent, wretched, sorid, slimey, and disgraceful?

Yes.

Are the acts criminal and punishable by law?

 

[Alicia J]

Trump won.

And? Why are all the mentally disturbed MAGA on here talking about the 2019 impeachment again?

 

[Billiejeens]

And? Why are all the mentally disturbed MAGA on here talking about the 2019 impeachment again?

Classified documents are constantly being released skancky who-er.

 

[Alicia J]

Classified documents are constantly being released skancky who-er.

Classified documents about a public impeachment trial? You're a special kind of simple, ain't ya?

 

[IM2]

I love how Democrats re-write history. It's amusing except that today's college students will be learning and then teaching our children and grandchildren these bald-faced lies.

Many, many people denied that Trump tried to "blackmail" Ukraine. and still deny it because it was never true. You're smarter than this, forkup.

The hearing proved it. Every witness who actually talked to Trump said he insisted "no quid pro quo." The only people who testified about quid pro quo were people who hated Trump and claimed that "it was known" that he was asking for quid pro quo.

The phone call that had the Dems once again doing the this-time-we-finally-got-him dance again turned out to be completely appropriate. Dems counted on the call being classified to allow them to lie about it, but they forgot who determines classification.

Wrong. Every witness did not say what you have claimed. The impeachment was justified. He should have been convicted at least the second time. If that had happened, we would not be in this mess.

 

[IM2]

Brilliant post. Spot on target.

Here is an example of mental retardation.

 

[Oddball]

I think that those of "us" expecting criminal charges to be handed down need to make certain that we can identify crimes.

Was everything that the Democrats did to thwart Trump and The MAGA movement dirty, disgusting, reprehensible, underhanded, despicable, contemptible, vile, loathsome, morally detestable, shameful, abhorrent, wretched, sorid, slimey, and disgraceful?

Yes.

Are the acts criminal and punishable by law?

 

[westwall]

Sure, what evidence was manufactured? Again, Trump released the transcript of the phone call himself. Nobody is disputing what it says as far as I know.

Pretty much all of it.

 

[westwall]

Here is an example of mental retardation.

Your specialty. Thanks for self identifying.

 

[Lockback]

And? Why are all the mentally disturbed MAGA on here talking about the 2019 impeachment again?

Oh ... I dunno ... maybe because it was all ONE GIANT EFFING LIE??