2019 Trump impeachment documents declassified

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
67,135
Reaction score
76,362
Points
3,615

“newly declassified documents from the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, reveal that even this whistleblower’s colleagues were skeptical of the spy craft, despite supporting the impeachment effort. One of the witnesses, identified as “witness #2,” worked with disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok, who was one of the main figures behind the Russian collusion hoax, and co-authored the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, ordered by Barack Obama before leaving office, which was full of flawed information to support the collusion narrative.”
.
.
.
This is interesting.

Of course, it is ok if the impeachment was based on lies, because the Bad Orange man is Bad.
 

“newly declassified documents from the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, reveal that even this whistleblower’s colleagues were skeptical of the spy craft, despite supporting the impeachment effort. One of the witnesses, identified as “witness #2,” worked with disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok, who was one of the main figures behind the Russian collusion hoax, and co-authored the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, ordered by Barack Obama before leaving office, which was full of flawed information to support the collusion narrative.”
.
.
.
This is interesting.

Of course, it is ok if the impeachment was based on lies, because the Bad Orange man is Bad.
You mean the effort that was based on a phone call that Trump released himself right?

So what was the lie? You are the third person who started a thread on this I've seen. Nobody seems to be able to answer what exactly you are alleging or why what happened is part of some conspiracy.

It was a Democrat who accused Trump seems a rather thin accusation, considering nobody is actually denying that Trump tried to blackmail Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden.

So what was the lie,
 
Last edited:
Certainly if evidence was manufactured or there were any impropriety in building the impeachment case, the public should know.
 
Certainly if evidence was manufactured or there were any impropriety in building the impeachment case, the public should know.
Sure, what evidence was manufactured? Again, Trump released the transcript of the phone call himself. Nobody is disputing what it says as far as I know.
 
I guess a review of the declassified files will answer many questions.
 
Groundhog.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom