Gabbard claims ‘coordinated effort’ by intelligence community to advance narrative to impeach Trump


DNI Tulsi Gabbard Exposes Conspiracy Used By Congress To Impeach President Trump | Office of the Director of National Intelligence
DNI Tulsi Gabbard Exposes Conspiracy Used By Congress To Impeach President Trump | Office of the Director of National Intelligence

April 13, 2026
The report effectively documents serious flaws and apparent bias in how the 2019 whistleblower complaint was processed and escalated. It reinforces the “impeachment hoax” narrative by showing the evidentiary weaknesses at the foundation.
Then House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) Chairman, Schiff (along with Nancy Pelosi) is accused of using the false, second-hand whistleblower narrative to generate media attention and lay the groundwork for Trump’s first impeachment in December 2019. Schiff was one of the key Congressional figures who helped escalate and weaponize the hearsay complaint into the impeachment process.

1776300921773.webp
 
Yes.
I believe it.
They are totally corrupt with absolutely no allegiance to the United States. They're Deep State creeps and Trump has really upset the apple cart. They knew it years ago when he jumped into the race in 2015 and they immediately gathered their forces to destroy him.
That's why I admire him so much, despite his very obvious personality flaws. He's taken those slings and arrows over and over and over and over again and STILL won the Presidency twice and has reduced the Democrat Party to children engaged in a constant Whine Fest.
P.S. I love Tulsi Gabbard. She's a person of integrity who left that shit party.
The transcript of Trump's phone call blackmailing Zelensky are "fake news". :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 
You are lying.
No such legal or constitutional requirement exists.
From my understanding thje constitution ONLY allows Congress to declare war silly one! Congress made some carve outs for the President to do such, only under certain conditions...imminent threat, is one of them....

War powers Resolution of 1973

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. 1541–1548) is a federal law intended to limit the U.S. president's authority to commit armed forces to hostile situations without congressional consent. Passed over President Nixon’s veto, it requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying troops and mandates their withdrawal within 60-90 days unless Congress declares war or authorizes force.

Key Provisions and Requirements
  • Consultation & Reporting: The President must consult with Congress before, and regularly after, introducing armed forces into hostilities or situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is indicated.
  • 48-Hour Notification: A report must be submitted to Congress within 48 hours of deploying troops into combat or foreign territories.
  • 60-Day Deadline: Armed forces must be withdrawn within 60 days unless Congress declares war, authorizes the action, or extends the deadline.
  • 30-Day Withdrawal Extension: An additional 30 days is allowed for the safe withdrawal of troops.
Historical Context and Purpose
  • Response to "Imperial Presidency": Congress passed the resolution to reassert its constitutional authority over war-making following the extensive, unauthorized engagement in the Korean and Vietnam conflicts.
  • Secret Bombings: It was a direct reaction to President Nixon's secret bombing of Cambodia, conducted without informing Congress or the public.
  • Purpose: To "insure that the collective judgement of both the Congress and the President" applies to the use of U.S. forces abroad, as outlined on the Avalon Project at Yale University.
...

The resolution passed by a two-thirds vote in both houses to override President Nixon's veto, highlighting a significant conflict over war powers at the time
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom