Marianne Williamson wants to form a third party

that's a great idea, my friends!


Oddly enough I heard her talking at one of the first DNC debates last Spring and she actually had a very good idea! She got like almost ZERO stage time, was kept off to the side and was quickly deposed of.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
What is most telling is that the Republican Party actively embraced, supported, defended and now enthusiastically identifies with a man who eagerly exploits the nation’s racial tensions. In our system, political parties should serve a circuit breaker function. The Republican Party never pulled the switch.
 
What is most telling is that the Republican Party actively embraced, supported, defended and now enthusiastically identifies with a man who eagerly exploits the nation’s racial tensions. In our system, political parties should serve a circuit breaker function. The Republican Party never pulled the switch.
I wouldnt say hes exploiting it,,more like dealing with the cards hes dealt,,,

if someone keeps throwing rocks at you you dont talk about teddy bears,,,
 
that's a great idea, my friends!


The democrat Party isn't Far Left enough! Go Marianne!
The only thing that can be further left than the current version of the Democrat party, is Marxism.
Karl Marx was born in 1818 and died in 1883. His ideology was formed by looking at how business owners treated their employees and how poorly they were paid for their hard work "in that era," the early years of the industrial revolution.
Fast forward to the 20th and 21st century and company employees have unions as a voice for the workers and can strike when the company heads ignore employees needs. Then, of course, there is OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration), which was established to ensure the safety of employees.
This nation created the rise of the Middle-Class, significantly reducing the numbers of poor. No nation has ever gotten so many people out of poverty and certainly, Marxism has not only reduced poverty, but simply engulfed more into it. Under Marxism, only the top tier in the Marxist Politburo, have a good living, all the rest are poor. It's also a one-party authoritarian system that oppresses and worse on people who don't agree with its policies. Under Marxism, people aren't even free to travel outside their nation, if they can't show they are good Communists. A good example is China that forbids anyone leaving the country if they haven't earned enough "social credits." People caught trying to flee Marxism, are forced to go to re-education camps and if they persist in not agreeing with the Marxist ideology, they go to gulags and from there, executed.
An excellent example of how Marxist nations treat anyone that wants freedom, was the Tiananmen Square Massacre of non-violent, sitting protesters simply wanting "freedom" from Marxism. Thousands were simply gunned down. Fast forward to Hong Kong and millions demanding the freedoms they knew when the British ruled the area and China cracked down on them as well.
Last. You have Marxists say that employees should get the profits of the companies, rather than the owners getting the profits. The owner takes literally, ALL the risks. The owners purchase the land, pay for the buildings on the sites, pay continually for the utilities, insurance coverage and materials. The employee only provides labor. If the employee that is applying for work at the company, he/she is told the pay offered up front. If he/she doesn't like the amount, he/she is free to go and apply elsewhere.
 
Why not? The Republicans and the Democrats are running our country into the ground, but good luck getting the American sheeple to vote for anyone but them.
 
Marianne Williamson is the Marshall Applewhite of the Democratic Party.
 
What is most telling is that the Republican Party actively embraced, supported, defended and now enthusiastically identifies with a man who eagerly exploits the nation’s racial tensions. In our system, political parties should serve a circuit breaker function. The Republican Party never pulled the switch.
Did you mean to say "the Democrat Party actively embraced, supported, defended and now enthusiastically identifies with a man who eagerly exploits the nation’s racial tensions?"

Of was the man who said "you ain't black if you don't vote for Joe" and "they want to put y'all back in chains"
not Joe Biden of Delaware?

Just be honest with yourself.
 

Forum List

Back
Top