Lt. Col. Stuart Scheller Jr. has pled guilty And Is Going To Jail

[jc456]

Xiden had a General fired for expressing the truth back when he was VP, now as President, he’s locking up military personal that disagrees.

The Emperor in Star Wars did something like this to the Jedi

so did hitler as I recall. Funny how this is turning slowly into the third reich now.

 

[surada]

Xiden had a General fired for expressing the truth back when he was VP, now as President, he’s locking up military personal that disagrees.

The Emperor in Star Wars did something like this to the Jedi

You are a moron. By law the President has NOTHING to say nor any power over prosecutions in the military.

 

[Dekster]

He knew what would happen and admitted to what he did. A matter of personal courage on his part. Whatever happens, happens. He did what he thought was right.

 

[Otis Mayfield]

Don't join the military if you aren't ready to follow orders.

 

[surada]

He knew what would happen and admitted to what he did. A matter of personal courage on his part. Whatever happens, happens. He did what he thought was right.

Couldn't stay off social media.

 

[Dekster]

Couldn't stay off social media.

He could have. Elected not to. That was his choice. Nobody made him do it.

 

[surada]

He could have. Elected not to. That was his choice. Nobody made him do it.

He had an agreement with the judge to stay off social media.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I hope by pleading guilty he keeps his pension and stays out of prison.
He doesn't deserve to be punished for speaking the truth to power.

Yes, he does deserve punishment because he violated the UCMJ.

 

[jc456]

Yes, he does deserve punishment because he violated the UCMJ.

wasn't there a guy who testified against trump in an impeachment going outside UCMJ? How come he didn't get court martialed? I'm just saying, are you implying there are two versions? one for demofks and all others?

 

[Juicin]

"and a gentlmen"

well that will have to go, eh?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

If Trump was president, this behavior would have been overlooked, even condoned

A moot point since the Afghanistan withdrawal disaster would have never happened
with Trump in office.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Yes, he does deserve punishment because he violated the UCMJ.

Brett Crozier violated the UCMJ. He wasn't court martialed.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

How about Army officer Lt. Colonel Alexander Vindman who, after eavesdropping on Donald Trump, was at the center of a politicized impeachment farce headed up by Schiff, Pelosi, Nadler and other democrat operatives?

 

[Claudette]

kyzr
I agree and hope he stays on active duty. All six charges were misdemeanors.

 

[struth]

You are a moron. By law the President has NOTHING to say nor any power over prosecutions in the military.

what law are you referring to? The US Constitution makes him the Commander and Chief of all the US Military.

 

[surada]

what law are you referring to? The US Constitution makes him the Commander and Chief of all the US Military.

He can't touch any military legal proceedings. Read the thread.

 

[jc456]

How about Army officer Lt. Colonel Alexander Vindman who, after eavesdropping on Donald Trump, was at the center of a politicized impeachment farce headed up by Schiff, Pelosi, Nadler and other democrat operatives?

yep the traitor I was referring to.

 

[jc456]

what law are you referring to? The US Constitution makes him the Commander and Chief of all the US Military.

can't make up how the demofks don't know chain of command.

 

[struth]

He can't touch any military legal proceedings. Read the thread.

I did....I also read the US Constitution....he's the Commander and Chief...the head off the DOD.

Moreover, the US Congress passed the Uniformed Code of Military Justice, just after WW2....

"
This led to enactment of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, or UCMJ. This unification of laws applicable to all U.S. armed forces included major changes to the range of offenses made punishable and the procedures for courts-martial (other major changes, like the requirement that trials be presided over by military judges and the creation of a robust military appellate process analogous to civilian appellate courts were adopted later). Importantly, Congress delegated to the President broad authority to adopt rules of procedure and evidence and to define maximum punishments for those convicted of violating the UCMJ. However, in one of the most important articles, Congress mandated that the rules of procedure and evidence used for trial by courts-martial should generally be analogous to those used in federal district courts, a provision intended to ensure that military criminal process produced credible and fair results and that military criminal defendants receive fair trials when judged against the touchstone of civilian criminal process.

This delegation of rule-making authority to the President reflects congressional recognition that as Commander in Chief, the President possesses broad and important authority over the armed forces."

Presidential Power and Military Justice: A Tradition of Effectiveness Under Strain | ACS

www.acslaw.org

Sorry, the President is in charge of it, just likes he's in charge of who's prosecuted at the DOJ, as he runs that as well

 

[jc456]

I did....I also read the US Constitution....he's the Commander and Chief...the head off the DOD.

Moreover, the US Congress passed the Uniformed Code of Military Justice, just after WW2....

"
This led to enactment of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, or UCMJ. This unification of laws applicable to all U.S. armed forces included major changes to the range of offenses made punishable and the procedures for courts-martial (other major changes, like the requirement that trials be presided over by military judges and the creation of a robust military appellate process analogous to civilian appellate courts were adopted later). Importantly, Congress delegated to the President broad authority to adopt rules of procedure and evidence and to define maximum punishments for those convicted of violating the UCMJ. However, in one of the most important articles, Congress mandated that the rules of procedure and evidence used for trial by courts-martial should generally be analogous to those used in federal district courts, a provision intended to ensure that military criminal process produced credible and fair results and that military criminal defendants receive fair trials when judged against the touchstone of civilian criminal process.

This delegation of rule-making authority to the President reflects congressional recognition that as Commander in Chief, the President possesses broad and important authority over the armed forces."

Presidential Power and Military Justice: A Tradition of Effectiveness Under Strain | ACS

www.acslaw.org

Sorry, the President is in charge of it, just likes he's in charge of who's prosecuted at the DOJ, as he runs that as well

and can fire the FBI director.