Liz cheney.

[Jim H - VA USA]

Reportedly, Liz Cheney orchestrated the anti-Trump WaPo Op-Ed by former Defense Secretaries...

Final nail in the coffin? Liz Cheney secretly orchestrated Washington Post op-ed by all ten living former Defense Secretaries, including her father, warning against Trump's efforts to politicize the military​

• Liz Cheney helped organize Washington Post op-ed by 10 former defense chiefs
• The piece was titled 'the time to question election results has passed, all living former defense secretaries say'
• The op -ed ran three days before the January 6 riot at the Capitol
• It said the time for questioning election results 'has passed'
• Cheney enlisted her father Dick Cheney and former Defense Sec. Jim Mattis
• New Yorker reported on her role and quoted Eric Edelman, a friend of Cheney's

Liz Cheney secretly orchestrated op-ed warning on Trump military

Republican Rep. Liz Cheney secretly helped put together an op-ed by 10 former Defense Secretaries before Jan. 6th warning that the time for disputing election results 'has passed.'

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[Chillicothe]

Liz Cheney has been a strong GOP leader for decades.
Decades.

She worked in the State Department, worked in Romney's campaign, in McCain's campaign. Was elected as Conference Chair after just a brief time in the House. She has a Republican resume' stronger and better vetted than virtually all.
The gal is eminently qualified. And the gal has chops.
By and large I haven't supported her political viewpoint, but.....but I'll give her props for voting her conscience. Voting her sense of what honorable citizenship is about.
The gal has guts.

And she is also righteously skeptical of Don Trump.
And very very skeptical of his role in the January 6th insurrection.
Righteously so.
Cheney recognized the danger of Trump's 'Big Lie' and the ominous portent those insurrectionist posed to American democracy, the clear and present danger of mob-rule.

What made the events of Jan. 6 so terrible, is not just that the rioters were violent and dangerous and destructive, but that they were violent and dangerous and destructive in the service of a terrible, anti-democratic deception.*

And Don Trump lies at the heart of that anti-democratic deception.

True that.





(*credit where credit is due: The thrust of that idea came from The Week yesterday.)

 

[strollingbones]

 

[kyzr]

btw there is also a possibility that Cheney, a Russia hawk, notices that Trump is doing Putin's (and Jina's) bidding on issue 1 for him, which is to sow dissent into whether our democratic-republic works.

Our democratic republic works, in spite of democrat cheating. You'll see in 2022 and 2024.
Please don't forget that you have zero evidence on the bogus Trump-Putin connection, while there are a billion reasons that prove the Xiden-Xi connection.

Here is why Putin wants Trump.
So tell my why Xi wants Biden.
because its doing terribly for Xi now, since Biden is helping Taiwan.

Taiwan isn't the only issue, and we still don't know what happens if/when China invades Taiwan, I'm not so sure Biden would look the other way to avoid a war with China. Xi sure paid the Bidens enough, we'll see how his investments work out.

Politifact says Trump was tougher on Russia than Obama/Biden.

Comparing Trump and Obama's 'tough' actions on Russia

Amid swelling evidence of Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election, President Donald Trump pushed back ag

www.politifact.com

Hunter Biden Offered $10 Million Annually by Chinese Energy Firm for ‘Introductions Alone,’ Email Shows

Explainer: Trump's claims and Hunter Biden's dealings in China

U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday called on China to investigate Joe Biden, a main Democratic contender in the 2020 race for the White House, about the involvement of his son in a fund that sought to raise Chinese capital.

www.reuters.com

Trump aint any different

Donald âTough on Chinaâ Trump Has a Secret Chinese Bank Account

Funny how he never mentions this while claiming Joe Biden would be beholden to China as president.

www.vanityfair.com

what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Show us how much money Trump GOT FROM CHINA. A "bank account" proves nothing. The Bidens got millions from China, Trump imposed tariffs on China. Your point is??

There is no evidence that the Bidens earning anything from China. Details here.

by contrast, Ivanka got 41 trademarks in china.

No evidence?? How about an email chain and an eye-witness-whistleblower?

Hunter Biden Offered $10 Million Annually by Chinese Energy Firm for ‘Introductions Alone,’ Email Shows

LOL!! Ivanka's trademarks are not a bribe of millions of dollars. Do you know what a "trademark" is?
Trump imposed serious tariffs on China. Watch what Biden does to earn his bribes.

China gave Ivana trump dozens of patents.
UAE/ Qatar invested millions into Kushner's companies.
Saudi Arabia spent millions at trump hotels.

Is Hunter running for some office? or hold any official position.

Sure, Hunter's official position is "Joe's Bagman".

Witness: Joe Biden Was “The Big Guy” [Updated]

A former business partner to Hunter Biden, Tony Bobulinski, has made a bombshell statement that not only are the emails on the Biden laptop authentic but the reference to giving a cut to “the…

jonathanturley.org

The venture—set up in 2017 after Mr. Biden left the vice presidency and before his presidential campaign—never received proposed funds from the Chinese company or completed any deals, according to people familiar with the matter. Corporate records reviewed by The Wall Street Journal show no role for Joe Biden.

Hunter's laptop emails and Mr. Bobulinski say otherwise. Believe what you want. There was no Burisma cash either, huh?

Credible news organizations have found no evidence to corroborate Bobulinski’s claims about a role in the proposed venture for Joe Biden. Joe Biden’s financial documents show no indication of any income related to the venture.

Sure, like Joe Biden didn't do anything in the Ukraine to protect his druggie son's other cash cow. I'm not buying that Hunter's scams are all legit.

Hunter Biden Offered $10 Million Annually by Chinese Energy Firm for ‘Introductions Alone,’ Email Shows

Ron Johnson cleared this up:

Republican Ron Johnson releases report critical of Hunter Biden, but offers no evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden

The GOP investigation has ignited furious partisan sparring in the weeks leading up to the Nov. 3 presidential election.

www.jsonline.com

Ron Johnson said that the Bidens need to be investigated...i.e. follow the money, from Ukraine and China. Remember Joe's extortion video using $1billion in aid, yes, or no?

Yes Ron Johnson said that, and he did that, and the result is in his report i referenced. Ron Johnson also covered Ukraine.

As far as firing of prosecutor Shokin. It wasnt just Biden who wanted him fired, it was our allies also. Shokin wasnt investigating corruption as he should have, so he need to be booted out.
But such a job of fighting corruption in ukraine is diffucult. i.e. our ambassador Marie Yovanovitch fired for actually fighting that corruption in ukraine.

Not to rehash the Ukraine prosecutors, but the guy following Shokin, covered up any investigation into the Biden's cash cow, Burisma. Yovanovich never fought anyone but Trump, who has every right to fire/replace any ambassador he wants. I don't recall her impeachment testimony, but generally the people testifying were deep state hacks who had their own agenda instead of Trump's. For example, Dr. Fiona Hill said not to arm Ukraine before saying to arm them?! WTF?

Ukraine Fires Burisma Prosecutor; Transfers Case over to Soros Group Linked to CIA ‘Whistleblower’

The Ukrainian prosecutor in charge of investigating the Burisma case and the Biden crime family has been fired, according to reports.

newspunch.com

And you believe that horse shit from”Newspunch”?

Of course you do

Show me where Shokin's successor prosecuted anyone. (hint: you can't, didn't happen)

Member of Ukrainian Parliament Sasha Ustinova Weighs In On What Really

As details about the July 25 phone call between U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky continue to emerge, Oleksandra “Sasha” Ustinova — a member of the Ukrainian parliament who has been fighting corruption in the country for years — said that Ukrainians are...

fsi.stanford.edu

"Shokin’s successor, Yuriy Lutsenko, who was Ukraine’s prosecutor general from 2016 through August 2019, also did not have the Ukrainian people’s best interests at heart, she said. Under Lutsenko, four of the five outstanding criminal cases against Zlochevsky were shut down. Zlochevsky – a Ukrainian oligarch who founded Burisma Holdings — was required to pay a $4 million fine and was ultimately allowed back in Ukraine."
“Ukrainians know that Shokin and Lutsenko are the bad guys in our country,” she said.. “So of course it was disappointing to hear [people speaking about them in a positive way], but I hope that getting the facts and the truth out there will help a lot of people – not only in Ukraine, but also in the U.S. — to understand who is good and who is bad.”

btw there is also a possibility that Cheney, a Russia hawk, notices that Trump is doing Putin's (and Jina's) bidding on issue 1 for him, which is to sow dissent into whether our democratic-republic works.

Our democratic republic works, in spite of democrat cheating. You'll see in 2022 and 2024.
Please don't forget that you have zero evidence on the bogus Trump-Putin connection, while there are a billion reasons that prove the Xiden-Xi connection.

Here is why Putin wants Trump.
So tell my why Xi wants Biden.
because its doing terribly for Xi now, since Biden is helping Taiwan.

Taiwan isn't the only issue, and we still don't know what happens if/when China invades Taiwan, I'm not so sure Biden would look the other way to avoid a war with China. Xi sure paid the Bidens enough, we'll see how his investments work out.

Politifact says Trump was tougher on Russia than Obama/Biden.

Comparing Trump and Obama's 'tough' actions on Russia

Amid swelling evidence of Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election, President Donald Trump pushed back ag

www.politifact.com

Hunter Biden Offered $10 Million Annually by Chinese Energy Firm for ‘Introductions Alone,’ Email Shows

Explainer: Trump's claims and Hunter Biden's dealings in China

U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday called on China to investigate Joe Biden, a main Democratic contender in the 2020 race for the White House, about the involvement of his son in a fund that sought to raise Chinese capital.

www.reuters.com

Trump aint any different

Donald âTough on Chinaâ Trump Has a Secret Chinese Bank Account

Funny how he never mentions this while claiming Joe Biden would be beholden to China as president.

www.vanityfair.com

what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Show us how much money Trump GOT FROM CHINA. A "bank account" proves nothing. The Bidens got millions from China, Trump imposed tariffs on China. Your point is??

There is no evidence that the Bidens earning anything from China. Details here.

by contrast, Ivanka got 41 trademarks in china.

No evidence?? How about an email chain and an eye-witness-whistleblower?

Hunter Biden Offered $10 Million Annually by Chinese Energy Firm for ‘Introductions Alone,’ Email Shows

LOL!! Ivanka's trademarks are not a bribe of millions of dollars. Do you know what a "trademark" is?
Trump imposed serious tariffs on China. Watch what Biden does to earn his bribes.

China gave Ivana trump dozens of patents.
UAE/ Qatar invested millions into Kushner's companies.
Saudi Arabia spent millions at trump hotels.

Is Hunter running for some office? or hold any official position.

Sure, Hunter's official position is "Joe's Bagman".

Witness: Joe Biden Was “The Big Guy” [Updated]

A former business partner to Hunter Biden, Tony Bobulinski, has made a bombshell statement that not only are the emails on the Biden laptop authentic but the reference to giving a cut to “the…

jonathanturley.org

The venture—set up in 2017 after Mr. Biden left the vice presidency and before his presidential campaign—never received proposed funds from the Chinese company or completed any deals, according to people familiar with the matter. Corporate records reviewed by The Wall Street Journal show no role for Joe Biden.

Hunter's laptop emails and Mr. Bobulinski say otherwise. Believe what you want. There was no Burisma cash either, huh?

Credible news organizations have found no evidence to corroborate Bobulinski’s claims about a role in the proposed venture for Joe Biden. Joe Biden’s financial documents show no indication of any income related to the venture.

Sure, like Joe Biden didn't do anything in the Ukraine to protect his druggie son's other cash cow. I'm not buying that Hunter's scams are all legit.

Hunter Biden Offered $10 Million Annually by Chinese Energy Firm for ‘Introductions Alone,’ Email Shows

Ron Johnson cleared this up:

Republican Ron Johnson releases report critical of Hunter Biden, but offers no evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden

The GOP investigation has ignited furious partisan sparring in the weeks leading up to the Nov. 3 presidential election.

www.jsonline.com

Ron Johnson said that the Bidens need to be investigated...i.e. follow the money, from Ukraine and China. Remember Joe's extortion video using $1billion in aid, yes, or no?

Yes Ron Johnson said that, and he did that, and the result is in his report i referenced. Ron Johnson also covered Ukraine.

As far as firing of prosecutor Shokin. It wasnt just Biden who wanted him fired, it was our allies also. Shokin wasnt investigating corruption as he should have, so he need to be booted out.
But such a job of fighting corruption in ukraine is diffucult. i.e. our ambassador Marie Yovanovitch fired for actually fighting that corruption in ukraine.

Not to rehash the Ukraine prosecutors, but the guy following Shokin, covered up any investigation into the Biden's cash cow, Burisma. Yovanovich never fought anyone but Trump, who has every right to fire/replace any ambassador he wants. I don't recall her impeachment testimony, but generally the people testifying were deep state hacks who had their own agenda instead of Trump's. For example, Dr. Fiona Hill said not to arm Ukraine before saying to arm them?! WTF?

Ukraine Fires Burisma Prosecutor; Transfers Case over to Soros Group Linked to CIA ‘Whistleblower’

The Ukrainian prosecutor in charge of investigating the Burisma case and the Biden crime family has been fired, according to reports.

newspunch.com

you just found the worst site on the internet, news punch, congrats.

The People's Voice (Newspunch) - Bias and Credibilty

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Like "mediabiasfactcheck" is any more honest.
Ever since the MSM went 95% negative on Trump with all fake news all the time, there are no "facts", just alternate facts and propaganda.

Lutsenko was Giuliani's best buddy in Ukraine, and was a big player in firing Marie Yovanovich.
However, even Lutsenko saw how pointless it was to pursue the Bidens in ukraine.

1. There were no "players" in firing Yovanovich. Ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the president, period.
2. The Bidens made a ton of money from Burisma.
3. The Bidens made a ton of money from China
4. "They" won't let Joe Biden answer reporter questions anymore, so who is really running the country?

 

[kyzr]

Liz Cheney has been a strong GOP leader for decades.
Decades.

She worked in the State Department, worked in Romney's campaign, in McCain's campaign. Was elected as Conference Chair after just a brief time in the House. She has a Republican resume' stronger and better vetted than virtually all.
The gal is eminently qualified. And the gal has chops.
By and large I haven't supported her political viewpoint, but.....but I'll give her props for voting her conscience. Voting her sense of what honorable citizenship is about.
The gal has guts.

And she is also righteously skeptical of Don Trump.
And very very skeptical of his role in the January 6th insurrection.
Righteously so.
Cheney recognized the danger of Trump's 'Big Lie' and the ominous portent those insurrectionist posed to American democracy, the clear and present danger of mob-rule.

What made the events of Jan. 6 so terrible, is not just that the rioters were violent and dangerous and destructive, but that they were violent and dangerous and destructive in the service of a terrible, anti-democratic deception.*

And Don Trump lies at the heart of that anti-democratic deception.

True that.





(*credit where credit is due: The thrust of that idea came from The Week yesterday.)

Liz is a "neocon". Maybe a "faux conservative". Definitely a Never-Trumper. That's why she's toast.
1. The GOP moved from losing presidential elections to winning.
2. The GOP moved from "faux conservatism" to"America First Populism"
3. The GOP needs to keep winning, and if Never-Trumpers like: Kasich, Romney, and Liz can't handle winning, then they should retire. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.
4. 2022 and 2024 will show if the US is ready for socialism, or if we keep capitalism.

 

[kyzr]

The "truth" is that Trump won the primary in 2016, and he won the general election.
Never-Trumpers prefer democrat/commies to patriots. They are now orphans with no home.

 

[dudmuck]

btw there is also a possibility that Cheney, a Russia hawk, notices that Trump is doing Putin's (and Jina's) bidding on issue 1 for him, which is to sow dissent into whether our democratic-republic works.

Our democratic republic works, in spite of democrat cheating. You'll see in 2022 and 2024.
Please don't forget that you have zero evidence on the bogus Trump-Putin connection, while there are a billion reasons that prove the Xiden-Xi connection.

Here is why Putin wants Trump.
So tell my why Xi wants Biden.
because its doing terribly for Xi now, since Biden is helping Taiwan.

Taiwan isn't the only issue, and we still don't know what happens if/when China invades Taiwan, I'm not so sure Biden would look the other way to avoid a war with China. Xi sure paid the Bidens enough, we'll see how his investments work out.

Politifact says Trump was tougher on Russia than Obama/Biden.

Comparing Trump and Obama's 'tough' actions on Russia

Amid swelling evidence of Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election, President Donald Trump pushed back ag

www.politifact.com

Hunter Biden Offered $10 Million Annually by Chinese Energy Firm for ‘Introductions Alone,’ Email Shows

Explainer: Trump's claims and Hunter Biden's dealings in China

U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday called on China to investigate Joe Biden, a main Democratic contender in the 2020 race for the White House, about the involvement of his son in a fund that sought to raise Chinese capital.

www.reuters.com

Trump aint any different

Donald âTough on Chinaâ Trump Has a Secret Chinese Bank Account

Funny how he never mentions this while claiming Joe Biden would be beholden to China as president.

www.vanityfair.com

what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Show us how much money Trump GOT FROM CHINA. A "bank account" proves nothing. The Bidens got millions from China, Trump imposed tariffs on China. Your point is??

There is no evidence that the Bidens earning anything from China. Details here.

by contrast, Ivanka got 41 trademarks in china.

No evidence?? How about an email chain and an eye-witness-whistleblower?

Hunter Biden Offered $10 Million Annually by Chinese Energy Firm for ‘Introductions Alone,’ Email Shows

LOL!! Ivanka's trademarks are not a bribe of millions of dollars. Do you know what a "trademark" is?
Trump imposed serious tariffs on China. Watch what Biden does to earn his bribes.

China gave Ivana trump dozens of patents.
UAE/ Qatar invested millions into Kushner's companies.
Saudi Arabia spent millions at trump hotels.

Is Hunter running for some office? or hold any official position.

Sure, Hunter's official position is "Joe's Bagman".

Witness: Joe Biden Was “The Big Guy” [Updated]

A former business partner to Hunter Biden, Tony Bobulinski, has made a bombshell statement that not only are the emails on the Biden laptop authentic but the reference to giving a cut to “the…

jonathanturley.org

The venture—set up in 2017 after Mr. Biden left the vice presidency and before his presidential campaign—never received proposed funds from the Chinese company or completed any deals, according to people familiar with the matter. Corporate records reviewed by The Wall Street Journal show no role for Joe Biden.

Hunter's laptop emails and Mr. Bobulinski say otherwise. Believe what you want. There was no Burisma cash either, huh?

Credible news organizations have found no evidence to corroborate Bobulinski’s claims about a role in the proposed venture for Joe Biden. Joe Biden’s financial documents show no indication of any income related to the venture.

Sure, like Joe Biden didn't do anything in the Ukraine to protect his druggie son's other cash cow. I'm not buying that Hunter's scams are all legit.

Hunter Biden Offered $10 Million Annually by Chinese Energy Firm for ‘Introductions Alone,’ Email Shows

Ron Johnson cleared this up:

Republican Ron Johnson releases report critical of Hunter Biden, but offers no evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden

The GOP investigation has ignited furious partisan sparring in the weeks leading up to the Nov. 3 presidential election.

www.jsonline.com

Ron Johnson said that the Bidens need to be investigated...i.e. follow the money, from Ukraine and China. Remember Joe's extortion video using $1billion in aid, yes, or no?

Yes Ron Johnson said that, and he did that, and the result is in his report i referenced. Ron Johnson also covered Ukraine.

As far as firing of prosecutor Shokin. It wasnt just Biden who wanted him fired, it was our allies also. Shokin wasnt investigating corruption as he should have, so he need to be booted out.
But such a job of fighting corruption in ukraine is diffucult. i.e. our ambassador Marie Yovanovitch fired for actually fighting that corruption in ukraine.

Not to rehash the Ukraine prosecutors, but the guy following Shokin, covered up any investigation into the Biden's cash cow, Burisma. Yovanovich never fought anyone but Trump, who has every right to fire/replace any ambassador he wants. I don't recall her impeachment testimony, but generally the people testifying were deep state hacks who had their own agenda instead of Trump's. For example, Dr. Fiona Hill said not to arm Ukraine before saying to arm them?! WTF?

Ukraine Fires Burisma Prosecutor; Transfers Case over to Soros Group Linked to CIA ‘Whistleblower’

The Ukrainian prosecutor in charge of investigating the Burisma case and the Biden crime family has been fired, according to reports.

newspunch.com

And you believe that horse shit from”Newspunch”?

Of course you do

Show me where Shokin's successor prosecuted anyone. (hint: you can't, didn't happen)

Member of Ukrainian Parliament Sasha Ustinova Weighs In On What Really

As details about the July 25 phone call between U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky continue to emerge, Oleksandra “Sasha” Ustinova — a member of the Ukrainian parliament who has been fighting corruption in the country for years — said that Ukrainians are...

fsi.stanford.edu

"Shokin’s successor, Yuriy Lutsenko, who was Ukraine’s prosecutor general from 2016 through August 2019, also did not have the Ukrainian people’s best interests at heart, she said. Under Lutsenko, four of the five outstanding criminal cases against Zlochevsky were shut down. Zlochevsky – a Ukrainian oligarch who founded Burisma Holdings — was required to pay a $4 million fine and was ultimately allowed back in Ukraine."
“Ukrainians know that Shokin and Lutsenko are the bad guys in our country,” she said.. “So of course it was disappointing to hear [people speaking about them in a positive way], but I hope that getting the facts and the truth out there will help a lot of people – not only in Ukraine, but also in the U.S. — to understand who is good and who is bad.”

btw there is also a possibility that Cheney, a Russia hawk, notices that Trump is doing Putin's (and Jina's) bidding on issue 1 for him, which is to sow dissent into whether our democratic-republic works.

Our democratic republic works, in spite of democrat cheating. You'll see in 2022 and 2024.
Please don't forget that you have zero evidence on the bogus Trump-Putin connection, while there are a billion reasons that prove the Xiden-Xi connection.

Here is why Putin wants Trump.
So tell my why Xi wants Biden.
because its doing terribly for Xi now, since Biden is helping Taiwan.

Taiwan isn't the only issue, and we still don't know what happens if/when China invades Taiwan, I'm not so sure Biden would look the other way to avoid a war with China. Xi sure paid the Bidens enough, we'll see how his investments work out.

Politifact says Trump was tougher on Russia than Obama/Biden.

Comparing Trump and Obama's 'tough' actions on Russia

Amid swelling evidence of Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election, President Donald Trump pushed back ag

www.politifact.com

Hunter Biden Offered $10 Million Annually by Chinese Energy Firm for ‘Introductions Alone,’ Email Shows

Explainer: Trump's claims and Hunter Biden's dealings in China

U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday called on China to investigate Joe Biden, a main Democratic contender in the 2020 race for the White House, about the involvement of his son in a fund that sought to raise Chinese capital.

www.reuters.com

Trump aint any different

Donald âTough on Chinaâ Trump Has a Secret Chinese Bank Account

Funny how he never mentions this while claiming Joe Biden would be beholden to China as president.

www.vanityfair.com

what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Show us how much money Trump GOT FROM CHINA. A "bank account" proves nothing. The Bidens got millions from China, Trump imposed tariffs on China. Your point is??

There is no evidence that the Bidens earning anything from China. Details here.

by contrast, Ivanka got 41 trademarks in china.

No evidence?? How about an email chain and an eye-witness-whistleblower?

Hunter Biden Offered $10 Million Annually by Chinese Energy Firm for ‘Introductions Alone,’ Email Shows

LOL!! Ivanka's trademarks are not a bribe of millions of dollars. Do you know what a "trademark" is?
Trump imposed serious tariffs on China. Watch what Biden does to earn his bribes.

China gave Ivana trump dozens of patents.
UAE/ Qatar invested millions into Kushner's companies.
Saudi Arabia spent millions at trump hotels.

Is Hunter running for some office? or hold any official position.

Sure, Hunter's official position is "Joe's Bagman".

Witness: Joe Biden Was “The Big Guy” [Updated]

A former business partner to Hunter Biden, Tony Bobulinski, has made a bombshell statement that not only are the emails on the Biden laptop authentic but the reference to giving a cut to “the…

jonathanturley.org

The venture—set up in 2017 after Mr. Biden left the vice presidency and before his presidential campaign—never received proposed funds from the Chinese company or completed any deals, according to people familiar with the matter. Corporate records reviewed by The Wall Street Journal show no role for Joe Biden.

Hunter's laptop emails and Mr. Bobulinski say otherwise. Believe what you want. There was no Burisma cash either, huh?

Credible news organizations have found no evidence to corroborate Bobulinski’s claims about a role in the proposed venture for Joe Biden. Joe Biden’s financial documents show no indication of any income related to the venture.

Sure, like Joe Biden didn't do anything in the Ukraine to protect his druggie son's other cash cow. I'm not buying that Hunter's scams are all legit.

Hunter Biden Offered $10 Million Annually by Chinese Energy Firm for ‘Introductions Alone,’ Email Shows

Ron Johnson cleared this up:

Republican Ron Johnson releases report critical of Hunter Biden, but offers no evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden

The GOP investigation has ignited furious partisan sparring in the weeks leading up to the Nov. 3 presidential election.

www.jsonline.com

Ron Johnson said that the Bidens need to be investigated...i.e. follow the money, from Ukraine and China. Remember Joe's extortion video using $1billion in aid, yes, or no?

Yes Ron Johnson said that, and he did that, and the result is in his report i referenced. Ron Johnson also covered Ukraine.

As far as firing of prosecutor Shokin. It wasnt just Biden who wanted him fired, it was our allies also. Shokin wasnt investigating corruption as he should have, so he need to be booted out.
But such a job of fighting corruption in ukraine is diffucult. i.e. our ambassador Marie Yovanovitch fired for actually fighting that corruption in ukraine.

Not to rehash the Ukraine prosecutors, but the guy following Shokin, covered up any investigation into the Biden's cash cow, Burisma. Yovanovich never fought anyone but Trump, who has every right to fire/replace any ambassador he wants. I don't recall her impeachment testimony, but generally the people testifying were deep state hacks who had their own agenda instead of Trump's. For example, Dr. Fiona Hill said not to arm Ukraine before saying to arm them?! WTF?

Ukraine Fires Burisma Prosecutor; Transfers Case over to Soros Group Linked to CIA ‘Whistleblower’

The Ukrainian prosecutor in charge of investigating the Burisma case and the Biden crime family has been fired, according to reports.

newspunch.com

you just found the worst site on the internet, news punch, congrats.

The People's Voice (Newspunch) - Bias and Credibilty

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Like "mediabiasfactcheck" is any more honest.
Ever since the MSM went 95% negative on Trump with all fake news all the time, there are no "facts", just alternate facts and propaganda.

Lutsenko was Giuliani's best buddy in Ukraine, and was a big player in firing Marie Yovanovich.
However, even Lutsenko saw how pointless it was to pursue the Bidens in ukraine.

1. There were no "players" in firing Yovanovich. Ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the president, period.
2. The Bidens made a ton of money from Burisma.
3. The Bidens made a ton of money from China
4. "They" won't let Joe Biden answer reporter questions anymore, so who is really running the country?

There are all sorts of players with Yovanovitch firing

The warrants specifically sought evidence related to former Ukrainian prosecutors general Viktor Shokin and Yuriy Lutsenko, former Ukrainian prosecutor Kostiantyn Kulyk and former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko

WSJ News Exclusive | Rudy Giuliani’s Contacts With Former Ukrainian Officials Sought

Federal investigators seek evidence related to former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch and several former Kyiv officials who pushed for her ouster.

www.wsj.com

whatever the Biden's made, its a paltry sum compared to what Ivanka/Jared/Trump earned during presidency.

And about the reporter questions:
No publicist recommends that their client with an important job requiring a lot of nuance takes impromptu questions. Answers can have ramifications and making accurate statements when you are POTUS is important. The alternative looks like the last President publicly postulating that injected disinfectants may beat COVID.

 

[Lesh]

2. The Bidens made a ton of money from Burisma.

Bullshit. Biden's son made a salary

3. The Bidens made a ton of money from China

Bullshit

 

[basquebromance]

Cheney said we should choose between Trump and the truth.

well, Liz, "the truth" never gave us free MAGA hats, did it?

How Liz Cheney and her dad paved the way for the Big Lie

She says Donald Trump crossed a line. But the Bush-Cheney administration didn't?

www.motherjones.com

/thread

 

[skye]

Probably Liz Cheney will be out sooner than we think!

What a traitor!!!

 

[Lesh]

Wait. So Liz Cheney was instrumental in keeping the military from taking over the government?

 

[bripat9643]

Says the guy who votes for a party that has no platform other than its hatred for Trump.

You don't know the Democratic platform? You don't know the differences between the parties on the freakin' issues?

Holy crap, are you kept in a cage? Do you ever see the sun? Are you adequately fed?

Your willful ignorance is your problem, not mine.

Explain the difference between the Democrat platform and the CPUSA platform

Provide the CPUSA platform. I looked. I couldn't find it on their website, just vague generalities and tedious platitudes.

And please source it. Not Hannity's or Tucker's or Breitbart's interpretations of it.

I'll wait here. Thanks in advance.

Oh, does this mean that you DO know the Democrats' platform? Were you lying before?

Communists Sue Democratic Party For Stealing Platform | Republican Party of Milwaukee County

That's all you have? A headline from a Trumpster site?

Show me their actual platform. What they want to do, specifically, and I will respond. If they're actual communists, this will be easy.

Now I know you're just lying again.

CPUSA Program

Yes, that's the "vague generalities and tedious platitudes" to which I referred.

Let me make this easier for you, if I can. Does the Democratic Party want:

1 Government ownership and control of all production?
2 Government ownership and control of all distribution?

Yes or no? Is that a simple enough question for you? Can you actually PROVE anything instead of providing worthless crap?

We both know you're in over your head here. All you can provide is talk radio talking points.

Once again, you claim the above is the communist platform, but it doesn't say that on their website. If that's the case, then why should anyone believe the Democrats don't want the exact same thing? You just admitted you can't believe what political parties say the want. Until you can prove that the above is the actual party agenda, your claim is bullshit. The Democrat party has the same agenda as the communist party.

So you admit that you don't have the platform. AND you say the platforms are the same. Even though you can't know.

Good gawd. You're such a waste of time.

Dismissed.

So far, the evidence we have shows the Democrate party platform is indistinguishable from the Communist party platform. No matter how furiously you weasel, you can't get away from that.

 

[BULLDOG]

Says the guy who votes for a party that has no platform other than its hatred for Trump.

You don't know the Democratic platform? You don't know the differences between the parties on the freakin' issues?

Holy crap, are you kept in a cage? Do you ever see the sun? Are you adequately fed?

Your willful ignorance is your problem, not mine.

Explain the difference between the Democrat platform and the CPUSA platform

Provide the CPUSA platform. I looked. I couldn't find it on their website, just vague generalities and tedious platitudes.

And please source it. Not Hannity's or Tucker's or Breitbart's interpretations of it.

I'll wait here. Thanks in advance.

Oh, does this mean that you DO know the Democrats' platform? Were you lying before?

Communists Sue Democratic Party For Stealing Platform | Republican Party of Milwaukee County

That's all you have? A headline from a Trumpster site?

Show me their actual platform. What they want to do, specifically, and I will respond. If they're actual communists, this will be easy.

Now I know you're just lying again.

CPUSA Program

Yes, that's the "vague generalities and tedious platitudes" to which I referred.

Let me make this easier for you, if I can. Does the Democratic Party want:

1 Government ownership and control of all production?
2 Government ownership and control of all distribution?

Yes or no? Is that a simple enough question for you? Can you actually PROVE anything instead of providing worthless crap?

We both know you're in over your head here. All you can provide is talk radio talking points.

Once again, you claim the above is the communist platform, but it doesn't say that on their website. If that's the case, then why should anyone believe the Democrats don't want the exact same thing? You just admitted you can't believe what political parties say the want. Until you can prove that the above is the actual party agenda, your claim is bullshit. The Democrat party has the same agenda as the communist party.

So you admit that you don't have the platform. AND you say the platforms are the same. Even though you can't know.

Good gawd. You're such a waste of time.

Dismissed.

So far, the evidence we have shows the Democrate party platform is indistinguishable from the Communist party platform. No matter how furiously you weasel, you can't get away from that.

More bullshit.

 

[bripat9643]

Says the guy who votes for a party that has no platform other than its hatred for Trump.

You don't know the Democratic platform? You don't know the differences between the parties on the freakin' issues?

Holy crap, are you kept in a cage? Do you ever see the sun? Are you adequately fed?

Your willful ignorance is your problem, not mine.

Explain the difference between the Democrat platform and the CPUSA platform

Provide the CPUSA platform. I looked. I couldn't find it on their website, just vague generalities and tedious platitudes.

And please source it. Not Hannity's or Tucker's or Breitbart's interpretations of it.

I'll wait here. Thanks in advance.

Oh, does this mean that you DO know the Democrats' platform? Were you lying before?

Communists Sue Democratic Party For Stealing Platform | Republican Party of Milwaukee County

That's all you have? A headline from a Trumpster site?

Show me their actual platform. What they want to do, specifically, and I will respond. If they're actual communists, this will be easy.

Now I know you're just lying again.

CPUSA Program

Yes, that's the "vague generalities and tedious platitudes" to which I referred.

Let me make this easier for you, if I can. Does the Democratic Party want:

1 Government ownership and control of all production?
2 Government ownership and control of all distribution?

Yes or no? Is that a simple enough question for you? Can you actually PROVE anything instead of providing worthless crap?

We both know you're in over your head here. All you can provide is talk radio talking points.

Once again, you claim the above is the communist platform, but it doesn't say that on their website. If that's the case, then why should anyone believe the Democrats don't want the exact same thing? You just admitted you can't believe what political parties say the want. Until you can prove that the above is the actual party agenda, your claim is bullshit. The Democrat party has the same agenda as the communist party.

So you admit that you don't have the platform. AND you say the platforms are the same. Even though you can't know.

Good gawd. You're such a waste of time.

Dismissed.

Weasel, weasel, weasel.

 

[bripat9643]

Says the guy who votes for a party that has no platform other than its hatred for Trump.

You don't know the Democratic platform? You don't know the differences between the parties on the freakin' issues?

Holy crap, are you kept in a cage? Do you ever see the sun? Are you adequately fed?

Your willful ignorance is your problem, not mine.

Explain the difference between the Democrat platform and the CPUSA platform

Provide the CPUSA platform. I looked. I couldn't find it on their website, just vague generalities and tedious platitudes.

And please source it. Not Hannity's or Tucker's or Breitbart's interpretations of it.

I'll wait here. Thanks in advance.

Oh, does this mean that you DO know the Democrats' platform? Were you lying before?

Communists Sue Democratic Party For Stealing Platform | Republican Party of Milwaukee County

That's all you have? A headline from a Trumpster site?

Show me their actual platform. What they want to do, specifically, and I will respond. If they're actual communists, this will be easy.

Now I know you're just lying again.

CPUSA Program

Yes, that's the "vague generalities and tedious platitudes" to which I referred.

Let me make this easier for you, if I can. Does the Democratic Party want:

1 Government ownership and control of all production?
2 Government ownership and control of all distribution?

Yes or no? Is that a simple enough question for you? Can you actually PROVE anything instead of providing worthless crap?

We both know you're in over your head here. All you can provide is talk radio talking points.

Once again, you claim the above is the communist platform, but it doesn't say that on their website. If that's the case, then why should anyone believe the Democrats don't want the exact same thing? You just admitted you can't believe what political parties say the want. Until you can prove that the above is the actual party agenda, your claim is bullshit. The Democrat party has the same agenda as the communist party.

So you admit that you don't have the platform. AND you say the platforms are the same. Even though you can't know.

Good gawd. You're such a waste of time.

Dismissed.

So far, the evidence we have shows the Democrate party platform is indistinguishable from the Communist party platform. No matter how furiously you weasel, you can't get away from that.

More bullshit.

fact.

 

[BULLDOG]

Says the guy who votes for a party that has no platform other than its hatred for Trump.

You don't know the Democratic platform? You don't know the differences between the parties on the freakin' issues?

Holy crap, are you kept in a cage? Do you ever see the sun? Are you adequately fed?

Your willful ignorance is your problem, not mine.

Explain the difference between the Democrat platform and the CPUSA platform

Provide the CPUSA platform. I looked. I couldn't find it on their website, just vague generalities and tedious platitudes.

And please source it. Not Hannity's or Tucker's or Breitbart's interpretations of it.

I'll wait here. Thanks in advance.

Oh, does this mean that you DO know the Democrats' platform? Were you lying before?

Communists Sue Democratic Party For Stealing Platform | Republican Party of Milwaukee County

That's all you have? A headline from a Trumpster site?

Show me their actual platform. What they want to do, specifically, and I will respond. If they're actual communists, this will be easy.

Now I know you're just lying again.

CPUSA Program

Yes, that's the "vague generalities and tedious platitudes" to which I referred.

Let me make this easier for you, if I can. Does the Democratic Party want:

1 Government ownership and control of all production?
2 Government ownership and control of all distribution?

Yes or no? Is that a simple enough question for you? Can you actually PROVE anything instead of providing worthless crap?

We both know you're in over your head here. All you can provide is talk radio talking points.

Once again, you claim the above is the communist platform, but it doesn't say that on their website. If that's the case, then why should anyone believe the Democrats don't want the exact same thing? You just admitted you can't believe what political parties say the want. Until you can prove that the above is the actual party agenda, your claim is bullshit. The Democrat party has the same agenda as the communist party.

So you admit that you don't have the platform. AND you say the platforms are the same. Even though you can't know.

Good gawd. You're such a waste of time.

Dismissed.

Weasel, weasel, weasel.

Yes. We all know you are a weasel. You don't have to remind us.

 

[Dadoalex]

She's come in for some criticism. Will she survive and go on to lead the party. Don't think she couldn't because she got guts.

Disagree with Cheney on most every issue.
On this one I'm torn.
If she succeeds she saves the Republican party from itself.
If she fails dies in the next couple of election cycles.
Look at the polls.
In nearly every policy issue of the day a clear majority opposes Trumpism.
Yet, Republicans insist on going forward with it.
But when over 60% of voters oppose you that means YOUR voters oppose you as well.
Without Trump but with dozens trying to be more Trumpy than Trump ever tried the electorate will completely turn off the Republicans.
But if she succeeds in saving the Republican party....
Well, they'll still be the Republican party so...

 

[DJT for Life]

Liz Cheney being fired for being truthful ... Stefanik a sycophant - who BTW is my Rep. in Congress

Full story is here >>>


Stefanik (Trump Lackey) vs. Cheney (Truth Teller)
(Trump favors Stefanik: Tells GOP do it)

Cheney is neocon scum like her old man.....McCarty is going to throw her overboard to try and save himself from the coming scandal, of him being bunkies with lobbyist turd Frank Luntz.

Suddenly, you moonbats are having fist fights to see who can crawl up Bush's ass first.

Damn, boy...You are spot on.

Tucker Carlson destroyed McCarthy will than report on Luntz. He has taken a big hit. He has been able to avoid
negative media coverage, because that will expose Luntz even more, but the folks in the know...KNOW.

Cheney is worthless. She cannot "lead" if you does not support the will of her own party. She's as butt hurt
for her Daddy, as McCain, Romney, Flake < Jeb all were for themselves, the inability to face and confront the
main street media. That bitch will be ousted next week and then the Cheney name will have a fight on their
hand back in Wyoming, to get her reelected to Congress. (The fight will come in the Primary.)

The Bitch doubled down on stupid and now she must go and will go.

McCarthy has no choice but to support her removal because he will need support to become Speaker of the
House when the GOP retakes the House in 2022

A lot of wishful thinking there son. We'll see how you after the vote.
As for the bitch references, it's strange how you all supported her unwaveringly until she did the right thing. Now she is a bitch. Temper temper son.

Nah...no temper to it. She got all my support...just like W, McCain and Romney until they turned tail and ran.

McCain was the worse. He promised his supporters he would overturn Obamacare, and when he had the chance
he put his thumb down...saying "fuck you" to the folks who supported him. He got what he deserved...a legacy of
being disgraced at death.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Can someone explain what specifically makes her a RHINO, or is that just a term you throw out at everyone these days?

That's rino, not rhino.

I heard today she has 14% who absolutely will vote for her. 52% absolutely will NOT vote for her.

She's toast.

 

[Coyote]

Can someone explain what specifically makes her a RHINO, or is that just a term you throw out at everyone these days?

That's rino, not rhino.

I heard today she has 14% who absolutely will vote for her. 52% absolutely will NOT vote for her.

She's toast.

Unfortunately the automatic spell check doesn't recognize RINO...