Democrats validating Einstien

eagle7-31

Diamond Member
Mar 24, 2020
5,681
7,825
1,938

with all the judicial bs. Then again the dems never really could take Trump straight on. They use lawfare do not challenge the deep state.
 

with all the judicial bs. Then again the dems never really could take Trump straight on. They use lawfare do not challenge the deep state.
The deep state? re they the leftists who are panting their tongues on and on how superior Marxists are, and their plan is to take away the free speech of their political foes. Marxism takeover doesn't take any critism so it can push a specific agenda of totalitarian rule over the peons they create en masses. Bleh to the Marxist armed "guardians" of whoever they fool. As a matter of fact, double bleh.
 

with all the judicial bs. Then again the dems never really could take Trump straight on. They use lawfare do not challenge the deep state.
All of these threads about how bad the case is and how weak the prosecution is and the judge is corrupt and the jury is biased and all the other lame assed excuses you kids throw at the wall every hour of every day just tell us how scared you are.
 

with all the judicial bs. Then again the dems never really could take Trump straight on. They use lawfare do not challenge the deep state.
Isn’t taking 2020 election issues to court, at this point, a sign of insanity?


sddefault.jpg



mike-lindell.jpg
 
Last edited:
All of these threads about how bad the case is and how weak the prosecution is and the judge is corrupt and the jury is biased and all the other lame assed excuses you kids throw at the wall every hour of every day just tell us how scared you are.
If your stuttering fuck actually got 81 million votes in the last election cycle - the most in our recorded history of 244 years - and then you tell us what a stellar job that bed-shitting shut-in has done.... well, you would have zero concerns about the upcoming election....hmm?

A couple debates, mop the floor with Trump and the 81 million should extrapolate to 91 million... hmm? There would be no reason to carry on with this nonsense and embarrass the entire party that likes to breed with children.

Right?

:laughing0301: :laughing0301:


who dresses this fucking retard.jpg
 
If your stuttering fuck actually got 81 million votes in the last election cycle - the most in our recorded history of 244 years - and then you tell us what a stellar job that bed-shitting shut-in has done.... well, you would have zero concerns about the upcoming election....hmm?

A couple debates, mop the floor with Trump and the 81 million should extrapolate to 91 million... hmm? There would be no reason to carry on with this nonsense and embarrass the entire party that likes to breed with children.

Right?

:laughing0301: :laughing0301:


View attachment 939883
You’re a sad case!
 
If your stuttering fuck actually got 81 million votes in the last election cycle - the most in our recorded history of 244 years - and then you tell us what a stellar job that bed-shitting shut-in has done.... well, you would have zero concerns about the upcoming election....hmm?

A couple debates, mop the floor with Trump and the 81 million should extrapolate to 91 million... hmm? There would be no reason to carry on with this nonsense and embarrass the entire party that likes to breed with children.

Right?

:laughing0301: :laughing0301:


View attachment 939883
You must think about pedophilia a lot because it's in every single one of your posts.
 

with all the judicial bs. Then again the dems never really could take Trump straight on. They use lawfare do not challenge the deep state.
which republicans have managed to "take trump straight on?" cruz? bush?

only mccain, liz cheney and kinzinger can really be said to have opposed trump, and they will not be factors going forward.

"lawfare," is how civilized people settle disputes. i know trumpists prefer violence, but trump's dream team of dynamic imaginative privaste sector attorneys from top elite ivy league schools seem capable of advancing the strategy of "delay until trump retrieves pardon power."

the prosecutors are lowly paid civil servants with degrees from state universities who are known to be lazy and corrupt. can't the judges see that and dismiss the cases?
 
The deep state? re they the leftists who are panting their tongues on and on how superior Marxists are, and their plan is to take away the free speech of their political foes. Marxism takeover doesn't take any critism so it can push a specific agenda of totalitarian rule over the peons they create en masses. Bleh to the Marxist armed "guardians" of whoever they fool. As a matter of fact, double bleh.
No one in the USA is for Marxism, bfm.
 
Isn’t taking 2020 election issues to court, at this point, a sign of insanity?


sddefault.jpg



mike-lindell.jpg
i was thinking "tax cuts" or the rerererere repeal of obamacare but this rerererere litigation of 2924 is more relevant to this thread.
 
which republicans have managed to "take trump straight on?" cruz? bush?

only mccain, liz cheney and kinzinger can really be said to have opposed trump, and they will not be factors going forward.

"lawfare," is how civilized people settle disputes. i know trumpists prefer violence, but trump's dream team of dynamic imaginative privaste sector attorneys from top elite ivy league schools seem capable of advancing the strategy of "delay until trump retrieves pardon power."

the prosecutors are lowly paid civil servants with degrees from state universities who are known to be lazy and corrupt. can't the judges see that and dismiss the cases?
BS. Trump also enjoys lawyering people to death....
 
A better way to put it is, I don't give a fuck what you think, or whether you choke to death on your own vomit in the next few minutes.

You seem to be confused, and I hope that cleared it up a little.
It's pretty clear from your posts what you are.
 

Forum List

Back
Top