Less than 6% of Biden's infrastructure actually goes to infrastructure

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Just Under 6 Percent of Biden's Infrastructure Plan Goes to Roads, Bridges

The proposal would spend $115 billion over eight years to modernize 20,000 miles of roadways and 10,000 bridges in need of repair.

www.newsweek.com

But I'm sure when the gop opposes this joke of a bill they will get the blame because the media won't actually inform their viewers why the gop opposes it.

The road to insolvency is paved with democrat spending sprees

 

[Claudette]

Just Under 6 Percent of Biden's Infrastructure Plan Goes to Roads, Bridges

The proposal would spend $115 billion over eight years to modernize 20,000 miles of roadways and 10,000 bridges in need of repair.

www.newsweek.com

But I'm sure when the gop opposes this joke of a bill they will get the blame because the media won't actually inform their viewers why the gop opposes it.

The road to insolvency is paved with democrat spending sprees

Yup. I heard that already but didn't know how much of that massive infrastructure bill was actually going to be put towards infrastructure. 6% huh?? Another massive bill filled with pork which we will pay for.

Seems like the stuttering fuck is trying to bankrupt the country.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

They are stealing what they can before they get neutered.

 

[AFrench2]

I agree actually, we need more than $2 trillion. That's a fair point.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

yep, it is another Greedy Democrat Looting Spree filled with pork barrel kick-back corruption

 

[kaz]

Just Under 6 Percent of Biden's Infrastructure Plan Goes to Roads, Bridges

The proposal would spend $115 billion over eight years to modernize 20,000 miles of roadways and 10,000 bridges in need of repair.

www.newsweek.com

But I'm sure when the gop opposes this joke of a bill they will get the blame because the media won't actually inform their viewers why the gop opposes it.

The road to insolvency is paved with democrat spending sprees

Wow, that's even less than the 9% of Biden's covid bill that went to covid

 

[kaz]

I agree actually, we need more than $2 trillion. That's a fair point.

The Democrat way. Under Trump, we couldn't afford a dime, nothing. Now money is no object to anything

 

[AFrench2]

I agree actually, we need more than $2 trillion. That's a fair point.

The Democrat way. Under Trump, we couldn't afford a dime, nothing. Now money is no object to anything

Yes, the Democrats not wanting to spend on *checks notes*

a shit borderwall means we couldn't afford a dime, nothing.

 

[Flash]

The reason why the Democrats worked so hard to steal the election from Trump is because they wanted to get their hands on the Treasury.

Thanks to the stupid uneducated Moon Bats that voted for Joe Dufus and then ignored the fact the election was stolen they succeeded.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I agree actually, we need more than $2 trillion. That's a fair point.

The Democrat way. Under Trump, we couldn't afford a dime, nothing. Now money is no object to anything

Yes, the Democrats not wanting to spend on *checks notes*

a shit borderwall means we couldn't afford a dime, nothing.

They stalled covid relief for MONTHS in the house.

Your memory is shit

 

[Claudette]

Just Under 6 Percent of Biden's Infrastructure Plan Goes to Roads, Bridges

The proposal would spend $115 billion over eight years to modernize 20,000 miles of roadways and 10,000 bridges in need of repair.

www.newsweek.com

But I'm sure when the gop opposes this joke of a bill they will get the blame because the media won't actually inform their viewers why the gop opposes it.

The road to insolvency is paved with democrat spending sprees

Wow, that's even less than the 9% of Biden's covid bill that went to covid

Yup. Two massive spending bills full of pork for blue cities and states which we tax payers will foot the bill for.

2022 can't get here fast enough. Hope the country isn't bankrupt before it gets here.

 

[kaz]

I agree actually, we need more than $2 trillion. That's a fair point.

The Democrat way. Under Trump, we couldn't afford a dime, nothing. Now money is no object to anything

Yes, the Democrats not wanting to spend on *checks notes*

a shit borderwall means we couldn't afford a dime, nothing.

Yes, the borderwall stopped you from importing unlimited Democrat voters. And PAYING for that? No way.

Being a sick fuck, all the women and children being molested, raped and enslaved is nothing to you. Not an issue at all

 

[AFrench2]

I agree actually, we need more than $2 trillion. That's a fair point.

The Democrat way. Under Trump, we couldn't afford a dime, nothing. Now money is no object to anything

Yes, the Democrats not wanting to spend on *checks notes*

a shit borderwall means we couldn't afford a dime, nothing.

They stalled covid relief for MONTHS in the house.

Your memory is shit

The CARES act was passed in March last year, COVID started in February. that's 30 days

 

[kaz]

I agree actually, we need more than $2 trillion. That's a fair point.

The Democrat way. Under Trump, we couldn't afford a dime, nothing. Now money is no object to anything

Yes, the Democrats not wanting to spend on *checks notes*

a shit borderwall means we couldn't afford a dime, nothing.

They stalled covid relief for MONTHS in the house.

Your memory is shit

He remembers fine. He's lying fascist scum

 

[kaz]

I agree actually, we need more than $2 trillion. That's a fair point.

The Democrat way. Under Trump, we couldn't afford a dime, nothing. Now money is no object to anything

Yes, the Democrats not wanting to spend on *checks notes*

a shit borderwall means we couldn't afford a dime, nothing.

They stalled covid relief for MONTHS in the house.

Your memory is shit

The CARES act was passed in March last year, COVID started in February. that's 30 days

The CARES act had less to do with Covid than Biden's 9% on Covid Covid bill

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I agree actually, we need more than $2 trillion. That's a fair point.

The Democrat way. Under Trump, we couldn't afford a dime, nothing. Now money is no object to anything

Yes, the Democrats not wanting to spend on *checks notes*

a shit borderwall means we couldn't afford a dime, nothing.

They stalled covid relief for MONTHS in the house.

Your memory is shit

The CARES act was passed in March last year, COVID started in February. that's 30 days

And the second DESPERATELY NEEDED stimulus came how many months after that?

At least you are consistently dishonest

 

[AFrench2]

I do remember fine. Y'all just make up random shit such as "Democrats couldn't spend a dime last year" when the CARES Act was *checks notes*

$800 billion in a slush fund sent to Trump buttbuddies such as Tom Brady.

 

[AFrench2]

I agree actually, we need more than $2 trillion. That's a fair point.

The Democrat way. Under Trump, we couldn't afford a dime, nothing. Now money is no object to anything

Yes, the Democrats not wanting to spend on *checks notes*

a shit borderwall means we couldn't afford a dime, nothing.

They stalled covid relief for MONTHS in the house.

Your memory is shit

The CARES act was passed in March last year, COVID started in February. that's 30 days

And the second DESPERATELY NEEDED stimulus came how many months after that?

At least you are consistently dishonest

8, I think. I got the first check in April and the 2nd in late December

 

[Nostra]

I agree actually, we need more than $2 trillion. That's a fair point.

Yeah, if you want Dimwingers to spend $2 TRILLION on infrastructure their bill would have to be about $33 TRILLION.

 

[AFrench2]

I agree actually, we need more than $2 trillion. That's a fair point.

Yeah, if you want Dimwingers to spend $2 TRILLION on infrastructure their bill would have to be about $33 TRILLION.

Silence, old man. It's time for your warm milk and nap.