Lawless party

Court effectively ruled that the Feds, not Texas has the jurisdiction over the fencing. Texas is refusing that order by

1. By continuing to build fencing Feds reject.
2. By blocking Federal agents from doing their job to correct the fencing.
What is going on is treason. People who support it are traitors too. That means you dumbass.
 
Sounds like very serious charges, can you cite specific criminal complaints?

I'm just kidding, everyone knows you are full of shit nutbag and there are no such complaints, never mind actual criminal charges.
Everyone knows you are a brainwashed POS. Anything else?
 
Don't know what that means.

SC is the final say on constitutional desputes of Federal and State powers.

If you say that is not the case then whats the next stop? States having their own interpretations of law in direct contradiction of the Federal ones?
There is no Texas border. , there is a US border. The state of Texas only has boundary lines that separate it from other states. The US border is exactly what it means.
 
Sounds like very serious charges, can you cite specific criminal complaints?

I'm just kidding, everyone knows you are full of shit nutbag and there are no such complaints, never mind actual criminal charges.
If only Texas would secede. It might start the hoped for dissolution of this shit show known as the American criminal empire.
 
U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of President Joe Biden by declaring that Texas went outside its jurisdiction by erecting makeshift concertina wire fences along the Rio Grande section of the U.S.-Mexico border, effectively preventing the U.S. border patrol from doing their job. Texas has continued building new wire barriers since that ruling.
Whatcha gonna do about it..... Bitch?
 
Very likely true. The authoritarians you love in DC, will mass murder any American state that tries to leave the horrible criminal empire.
Youse a funny dude. Acknowledging certain facts or realities doesn't mean love at tall.
 
If they were not both "lawless" parties, the illegal and absolutely disastrous Iraq invasion would not have happened, with all its destructive consequences. The duopoly is complicit in blood shed for which it could never pay.
 
If they were not both "lawless" parties, the illegal and absolutely disastrous Iraq invasion would not have happened, with all its destructive consequences. The duopoly is complicit in blood shed for which it could never pay.
Those are the things people are trying very hard to change but none of them have any power. We are not represented in Congress.
 
If they were not both "lawless" parties, the illegal and absolutely disastrous Iraq invasion would not have happened, with all its destructive consequences. The duopoly is complicit in blood shed for which it could never pay.
Americans are stuck on stupid. They fall for the establishment scam the two parties are different, along with believing foolishness like government works to help and protect the people. They haven’t figured out our government is an enemy of the people and take’s it’s orders from big corporations and extremely wealthy individuals.
 
Don't know what that means.

SC is the final say on constitutional desputes of Federal and State powers.

If you say that is not the case then whats the next stop? States having their own interpretations of law in direct contradiction of the Federal ones?
The SC just gave the Fed border patrol agents permission to cut the fencing that keeps the would-be illegals out. There are decisions and there are the consequences of those decisions. The SC doesn't seem to be concerned with the latter.
 
The SC just gave the Fed border patrol agents permission to cut the fencing that keeps the would-be illegals out. There are decisions and there are the consequences of those decisions. The SC doesn't seem to be concerned with the latter.
The SC is just another corrupt branch of government. Americans like to think it’s some august revered high court dispensing justice fairly and according to the constitution. Lol.
 
The SC just gave the Fed border patrol agents permission to cut the fencing that keeps the would-be illegals out. There are decisions and there are the consequences of those decisions. The SC doesn't seem to be concerned with the latter.
I don't see what SC respecting the laws of the land has to do with answering the question I've asked you.

What other possible alternative is there?
 
The SC is just another corrupt branch of government. Americans like to think it’s some august revered high court dispensing justice fairly and according to the constitution. Lol.

Instead of complaining about poor SCOTUS decisions, Congress would do better to defund the poor decisions that the court makes and that they oppose.

Unfortunately, Congress is derelict and seems to have made a bad habit of kicking their duty over to the court.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top