Lawless party

[rightwinger]

Good for them, there's more on the way.

Why do Republicans use human beings as political pawns?
Why do you drop people off in sub zero temperatures?

 

[AntonToo]

So you don't believe in states' rights?

SCOTUS has been consistent and clear that enforcing the border is the pre-eminent Federal domain.

States do not have the right to over-ride the Federal government on this.

They OF COURSE have other rights.

 

[rightwinger]

You go outside of the Constitution when it doesn't address your needs.

Show where

 

[MarcATL]

You must be referring to the Biden administration.

Republicans are the party about lawlessness. Fact.

 

[BlindBoo]

Texas has taken in 8 million immigrants.

BS.

There have been 8.1 million encounters with migrants nationwide under Biden, but that number does not represent unique individuals. And not all who were stopped were allowed to stay in the U.S.

There have been 3.6 million removals, returns and expulsions under Biden’s administration. This data also represents events, not people.

Fact check: Have '8 million' migrants come to the U.S. under Biden?

Republican presidential candidates Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis have each claimed that 8 million immigrants have entered the U.S. through the southern border since Joe Biden became president.

www.wral.com

 

[Thinker101]

Why do Republicans use human beings as political pawns?
Why do you drop people off in sub zero temperatures?

You idiots created the problem, now deal with it.

 

[westwall]

...I want you Republicans to get behind LAWFUL GOVERNING, instead of red meat feeding politico bullshit schemes.

Crazy I know.

THEN CLOSE THE FUCKING BORDER LIKE THE LAW DEMANDS!

 

[Blaster]

Republicans are the party about lawlessness. Fact.

FALSE

 

[AntonToo]

THEN CLOSE THE FUCKING BORDER LIKE THE LAW DEMANDS!

There is no law requiring "fucking closing" any border.

 

[Blaster]

There is no law requiring "fucking closing" any border.

Haha, you are nuts.

 

[AntonToo]

Haha, you are nuts.

Time put your littering posts on ignore. Zero content.

 

[Blaster]

Time put your littering posts on ignore. Zero content.

Go right ahead coward.

 

[Moonglow]

Try enforcing them, otherwise they are meaningless, much like the Federal has become

They are enforced, dumbass.

 

[BlindBoo]

Haha, you are nuts.

Then it should be easy for you to cite the statute that closed the borders.

Texas was the nation’s second-largest importing state behind California, bringing in nearly $294.9 billion in goods.

Texas’ International Trade

With the nation’s longest stretch of international border and some of its busiest ports, Texas benefits enormously from global trade.

comptroller.texas.gov

Can't do that if the borders are closed.

 

[Thinker101]

Why do Republicans use human beings as political pawns?
Why do you drop people off in sub zero temperatures?

Suck it up buttercup, it's "transitory".

 

[Flash]

U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of President Joe Biden by declaring that Texas went outside its jurisdiction by erecting makeshift concertina wire fences along the Rio Grande section of the U.S.-Mexico border, effectively preventing the U.S. border patrol from doing their job. Texas has continued building new wire barriers since that ruling.

At least 25 Republican governors have declared their support for Abbott, including Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin, Alabama Governor Kay Ivey, and Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon.

Republicans Push Greg Abbott to Go All Out in Border War With Biden

Republican lawmakers are pledging to back Texas Governor Greg Abbott as he defies the Supreme Court.

newrepublic.com

So there we have it - Republicans who previously called themselves the party of Law and Order...have now degenerated to supporting refusing SCOTUS court orders to score political points with their rabid base.

I guess that goes hand in hand with 2/3s of Republicans being behind putting into White House a twice impeached fraudster indicted on 90+ criminal charges.

The Supreme Court also ruled in Heller, McDonald and Bruen that the States and Locals could not restrict the right to keep and bear arms to the degree that they had been doing. However, states like New York, Washington, Illinois and California have completely ignored the rulings.

If you are so concerned about the states ignoring the Supreme Court ruling are you also pissed at the Communist states that have completely ignored SCOTUS in regards to the right to keep and bear arms or is that "different"?

 

[Woodznutz]

Show where

Any problem that the Constitution doesn't address.

 

[Woodznutz]

Why do Republicans use human beings as political pawns?
Why do you drop people off in sub zero temperatures?

It's warmer now.

 

[Woodznutz]

SCOTUS has been consistent and clear that enforcing the border is the pre-eminent Federal domain.

States do not have the right to over-ride the Federal government on this.

They OF COURSE have other rights.

The SC just ruled that the fox should be put in charge of guarding the henhouse.

 

[AntonToo]

The SC just ruled that the fox should be put in charge of guarding the henhouse.

Don't know what that means.

SC is the final say on constitutional desputes of Federal and State powers.

If you say that is not the case then whats the next stop? States having their own interpretations of law in direct contradiction of the Federal ones?