Latest Round of Censorship from the Left

Absolutely unacceptable. The civilization haters are at it again.



Many people have been banned from youtube for the crime of having the wrong (pro president Trump) opinion also. I suppose everyone knew this was coming, the left can not be negotiated with... but... are the conservatives going to finally do something about it or just continue losing with style?



Establishment Republicans love to lose with style.

A new chapter is being written in America.


They will be guillotined first, even before the leftist pawns, but at least they will go out with all their principles so... no problem?

What time does that start!!??
 
[
Oh, I agree on that. You just don't know how pissed we are. And "aren't going to take it anymore" means a whole lot more from the likes of me.
What's THAT supposed to mean? You're treading close to threatening violence on the board. You just said the likes of you would do more than what we've seen so far. That's why Trump is going down. The people are starting to see who's really in his corner and they don't like it. I here Siberia is something else in November. Perhaps you'd like it better there when the inevitable happens.
If it comes to civil war... I'm on Freedom of speech side. Heads up. I personally don't care if you like it or not.


" I'm on Freedom of speech side. "


you'll have to be more specific.

the left wants to silence the right

the right wants to silence everyone else....

are you a moderate?
I'm an independent. Otherwise I'm on the same side I'm always on... MINE.

Ummm... The Left isn't getting banned on Twitter, Facebook, ext... ext... So uhhh... Yeah.

Ummm....ya, they are...


The other people affected by such “shadow banning” in the past include Democrats, as mentioned in the Twitter blog post, other progressives, transgender users, Black Lives Matter activists, feminists, socialists and users that participated in culture-jamming campaigns against ISIL. The reason for all types of people on the political spectrum, and the folks using hashtags like #OpISIS, #OpIceISIS or spreading ISIS-chan, is because of a massively shared blocklist… that even ISIL contributed to 2015. That massive blocklist is so prevalent today, it is even used by Hollywood celebrities.


They have the regular rules for everyone.

And then the basic rule that more or less everyone relevant that supports the greatest president in history gets banned.

Twitter hosts tons of conservative pro-Trump voices. If you consider white supremacists and similar hate mongers to be “everyone relevant” Trump is in serious trouble.


they (conservatives) will say "I got banned MERELY because I DISAGREED with a liberal"


but if you actually read what they posted.....
"the only good liberal is a dead liberal"

Guess who did not get banned?

Screen_Shot_2018-08-05_at_4.49.12_PM.png


In fact, she got hired. The opposite of deplatforming.


well

as funny as that is.....

it isn't fair.....

Funny? That message was not intended as humor you moron.


sorry to trigger you, lucy....

:)
Oh, I agree on that. You just don't know how pissed we are. And "aren't going to take it anymore" means a whole lot more from the likes of me.
What's THAT supposed to mean? You're treading close to threatening violence on the board. You just said the likes of you would do more than what we've seen so far. That's why Trump is going down. The people are starting to see who's really in his corner and they don't like it. I here Siberia is something else in November. Perhaps you'd like it better there when the inevitable happens.
If it comes to civil war... I'm on Freedom of speech side. Heads up. I personally don't care if you like it or not.


" I'm on Freedom of speech side. "


you'll have to be more specific.

the left wants to silence the right

the right wants to silence everyone else....

are you a moderate?
I'm an independent. Otherwise I'm on the same side I'm always on... MINE.

Ummm... The Left isn't getting banned on Twitter, Facebook, ext... ext... So uhhh... Yeah.

Ummm....ya, they are...


The other people affected by such “shadow banning” in the past include Democrats, as mentioned in the Twitter blog post, other progressives, transgender users, Black Lives Matter activists, feminists, socialists and users that participated in culture-jamming campaigns against ISIL. The reason for all types of people on the political spectrum, and the folks using hashtags like #OpISIS, #OpIceISIS or spreading ISIS-chan, is because of a massively shared blocklist… that even ISIL contributed to 2015. That massive blocklist is so prevalent today, it is even used by Hollywood celebrities.


They have the regular rules for everyone.

And then the basic rule that more or less everyone relevant that supports the greatest president in history gets banned.

Twitter hosts tons of conservative pro-Trump voices. If you consider white supremacists and similar hate mongers to be “everyone relevant” Trump is in serious trouble.


they (conservatives) will say "I got banned MERELY because I DISAGREED with a liberal"


but if you actually read what they posted.....
"the only good liberal is a dead liberal"

Guess who did not get banned?

Screen_Shot_2018-08-05_at_4.49.12_PM.png


In fact, she got hired. The opposite of deplatforming.

hmmm...like half the names hear I have not heard of her...but a little research is helpful.

This article is from 2018, and states those bigoted/racist tweets were from up to five years prior, making that 2013. Were Theybanning people then? Don’t think the pressure was there yet for the tech industry to clean up. Since she stopped in 2013, why would they ban her now?

NYT hired her, well that is on them.

You have not heard of her?

These tweets have been repeatedly posted here.

I pay little attention to most tweets, they are background noise.

Nice virtue signaling. As an USMB mod, do you pay any attention to your board?







 
[
Oh, I agree on that. You just don't know how pissed we are. And "aren't going to take it anymore" means a whole lot more from the likes of me.
What's THAT supposed to mean? You're treading close to threatening violence on the board. You just said the likes of you would do more than what we've seen so far. That's why Trump is going down. The people are starting to see who's really in his corner and they don't like it. I here Siberia is something else in November. Perhaps you'd like it better there when the inevitable happens.
If it comes to civil war... I'm on Freedom of speech side. Heads up. I personally don't care if you like it or not.


" I'm on Freedom of speech side. "


you'll have to be more specific.

the left wants to silence the right

the right wants to silence everyone else....

are you a moderate?
I'm an independent. Otherwise I'm on the same side I'm always on... MINE.

Ummm... The Left isn't getting banned on Twitter, Facebook, ext... ext... So uhhh... Yeah.

Ummm....ya, they are...


The other people affected by such “shadow banning” in the past include Democrats, as mentioned in the Twitter blog post, other progressives, transgender users, Black Lives Matter activists, feminists, socialists and users that participated in culture-jamming campaigns against ISIL. The reason for all types of people on the political spectrum, and the folks using hashtags like #OpISIS, #OpIceISIS or spreading ISIS-chan, is because of a massively shared blocklist… that even ISIL contributed to 2015. That massive blocklist is so prevalent today, it is even used by Hollywood celebrities.


They have the regular rules for everyone.

And then the basic rule that more or less everyone relevant that supports the greatest president in history gets banned.

Twitter hosts tons of conservative pro-Trump voices. If you consider white supremacists and similar hate mongers to be “everyone relevant” Trump is in serious trouble.


they (conservatives) will say "I got banned MERELY because I DISAGREED with a liberal"


but if you actually read what they posted.....
"the only good liberal is a dead liberal"

Guess who did not get banned?

Screen_Shot_2018-08-05_at_4.49.12_PM.png


In fact, she got hired. The opposite of deplatforming.


well

as funny as that is.....

it isn't fair.....

Funny? That message was not intended as humor you moron.


sorry to trigger you, lucy....

:)
Oh, I agree on that. You just don't know how pissed we are. And "aren't going to take it anymore" means a whole lot more from the likes of me.
What's THAT supposed to mean? You're treading close to threatening violence on the board. You just said the likes of you would do more than what we've seen so far. That's why Trump is going down. The people are starting to see who's really in his corner and they don't like it. I here Siberia is something else in November. Perhaps you'd like it better there when the inevitable happens.
If it comes to civil war... I'm on Freedom of speech side. Heads up. I personally don't care if you like it or not.


" I'm on Freedom of speech side. "


you'll have to be more specific.

the left wants to silence the right

the right wants to silence everyone else....

are you a moderate?
I'm an independent. Otherwise I'm on the same side I'm always on... MINE.

Ummm... The Left isn't getting banned on Twitter, Facebook, ext... ext... So uhhh... Yeah.

Ummm....ya, they are...


The other people affected by such “shadow banning” in the past include Democrats, as mentioned in the Twitter blog post, other progressives, transgender users, Black Lives Matter activists, feminists, socialists and users that participated in culture-jamming campaigns against ISIL. The reason for all types of people on the political spectrum, and the folks using hashtags like #OpISIS, #OpIceISIS or spreading ISIS-chan, is because of a massively shared blocklist… that even ISIL contributed to 2015. That massive blocklist is so prevalent today, it is even used by Hollywood celebrities.


They have the regular rules for everyone.

And then the basic rule that more or less everyone relevant that supports the greatest president in history gets banned.

Twitter hosts tons of conservative pro-Trump voices. If you consider white supremacists and similar hate mongers to be “everyone relevant” Trump is in serious trouble.


they (conservatives) will say "I got banned MERELY because I DISAGREED with a liberal"


but if you actually read what they posted.....
"the only good liberal is a dead liberal"

Guess who did not get banned?

Screen_Shot_2018-08-05_at_4.49.12_PM.png


In fact, she got hired. The opposite of deplatforming.

hmmm...like half the names hear I have not heard of her...but a little research is helpful.

This article is from 2018, and states those bigoted/racist tweets were from up to five years prior, making that 2013. Were Theybanning people then? Don’t think the pressure was there yet for the tech industry to clean up. Since she stopped in 2013, why would they ban her now?

NYT hired her, well that is on them.

You have not heard of her?

These tweets have been repeatedly posted here.

I pay little attention to most tweets, they are background noise.

Nice virtue signaling. As an USMB mod, do you pay any attention to your board?







You mean do I read every thread? Hell no. I especially ignore celebrity crap stuff.
 
[
Oh, I agree on that. You just don't know how pissed we are. And "aren't going to take it anymore" means a whole lot more from the likes of me.
What's THAT supposed to mean? You're treading close to threatening violence on the board. You just said the likes of you would do more than what we've seen so far. That's why Trump is going down. The people are starting to see who's really in his corner and they don't like it. I here Siberia is something else in November. Perhaps you'd like it better there when the inevitable happens.
If it comes to civil war... I'm on Freedom of speech side. Heads up. I personally don't care if you like it or not.


" I'm on Freedom of speech side. "


you'll have to be more specific.

the left wants to silence the right

the right wants to silence everyone else....

are you a moderate?
I'm an independent. Otherwise I'm on the same side I'm always on... MINE.

Ummm... The Left isn't getting banned on Twitter, Facebook, ext... ext... So uhhh... Yeah.

Ummm....ya, they are...


The other people affected by such “shadow banning” in the past include Democrats, as mentioned in the Twitter blog post, other progressives, transgender users, Black Lives Matter activists, feminists, socialists and users that participated in culture-jamming campaigns against ISIL. The reason for all types of people on the political spectrum, and the folks using hashtags like #OpISIS, #OpIceISIS or spreading ISIS-chan, is because of a massively shared blocklist… that even ISIL contributed to 2015. That massive blocklist is so prevalent today, it is even used by Hollywood celebrities.


They have the regular rules for everyone.

And then the basic rule that more or less everyone relevant that supports the greatest president in history gets banned.

Twitter hosts tons of conservative pro-Trump voices. If you consider white supremacists and similar hate mongers to be “everyone relevant” Trump is in serious trouble.


they (conservatives) will say "I got banned MERELY because I DISAGREED with a liberal"


but if you actually read what they posted.....
"the only good liberal is a dead liberal"

Guess who did not get banned?

Screen_Shot_2018-08-05_at_4.49.12_PM.png


In fact, she got hired. The opposite of deplatforming.


well

as funny as that is.....

it isn't fair.....

Funny? That message was not intended as humor you moron.


sorry to trigger you, lucy....

:)
Oh, I agree on that. You just don't know how pissed we are. And "aren't going to take it anymore" means a whole lot more from the likes of me.
What's THAT supposed to mean? You're treading close to threatening violence on the board. You just said the likes of you would do more than what we've seen so far. That's why Trump is going down. The people are starting to see who's really in his corner and they don't like it. I here Siberia is something else in November. Perhaps you'd like it better there when the inevitable happens.
If it comes to civil war... I'm on Freedom of speech side. Heads up. I personally don't care if you like it or not.


" I'm on Freedom of speech side. "


you'll have to be more specific.

the left wants to silence the right

the right wants to silence everyone else....

are you a moderate?
I'm an independent. Otherwise I'm on the same side I'm always on... MINE.

Ummm... The Left isn't getting banned on Twitter, Facebook, ext... ext... So uhhh... Yeah.

Ummm....ya, they are...


The other people affected by such “shadow banning” in the past include Democrats, as mentioned in the Twitter blog post, other progressives, transgender users, Black Lives Matter activists, feminists, socialists and users that participated in culture-jamming campaigns against ISIL. The reason for all types of people on the political spectrum, and the folks using hashtags like #OpISIS, #OpIceISIS or spreading ISIS-chan, is because of a massively shared blocklist… that even ISIL contributed to 2015. That massive blocklist is so prevalent today, it is even used by Hollywood celebrities.


They have the regular rules for everyone.

And then the basic rule that more or less everyone relevant that supports the greatest president in history gets banned.

Twitter hosts tons of conservative pro-Trump voices. If you consider white supremacists and similar hate mongers to be “everyone relevant” Trump is in serious trouble.


they (conservatives) will say "I got banned MERELY because I DISAGREED with a liberal"


but if you actually read what they posted.....
"the only good liberal is a dead liberal"

Guess who did not get banned?

Screen_Shot_2018-08-05_at_4.49.12_PM.png


In fact, she got hired. The opposite of deplatforming.

hmmm...like half the names hear I have not heard of her...but a little research is helpful.

This article is from 2018, and states those bigoted/racist tweets were from up to five years prior, making that 2013. Were Theybanning people then? Don’t think the pressure was there yet for the tech industry to clean up. Since she stopped in 2013, why would they ban her now?

NYT hired her, well that is on them.

You have not heard of her?

These tweets have been repeatedly posted here.

I pay little attention to most tweets, they are background noise.

Nice virtue signaling. As an USMB mod, do you pay any attention to your board?








well, lucy, I must admit....if they censor or ban one side for saying X then the other side should be treated the same way for saying the same thing
 
[
Oh, I agree on that. You just don't know how pissed we are. And "aren't going to take it anymore" means a whole lot more from the likes of me.
What's THAT supposed to mean? You're treading close to threatening violence on the board. You just said the likes of you would do more than what we've seen so far. That's why Trump is going down. The people are starting to see who's really in his corner and they don't like it. I here Siberia is something else in November. Perhaps you'd like it better there when the inevitable happens.
If it comes to civil war... I'm on Freedom of speech side. Heads up. I personally don't care if you like it or not.


" I'm on Freedom of speech side. "


you'll have to be more specific.

the left wants to silence the right

the right wants to silence everyone else....

are you a moderate?
I'm an independent. Otherwise I'm on the same side I'm always on... MINE.

Ummm... The Left isn't getting banned on Twitter, Facebook, ext... ext... So uhhh... Yeah.

Ummm....ya, they are...


The other people affected by such “shadow banning” in the past include Democrats, as mentioned in the Twitter blog post, other progressives, transgender users, Black Lives Matter activists, feminists, socialists and users that participated in culture-jamming campaigns against ISIL. The reason for all types of people on the political spectrum, and the folks using hashtags like #OpISIS, #OpIceISIS or spreading ISIS-chan, is because of a massively shared blocklist… that even ISIL contributed to 2015. That massive blocklist is so prevalent today, it is even used by Hollywood celebrities.


They have the regular rules for everyone.

And then the basic rule that more or less everyone relevant that supports the greatest president in history gets banned.

Twitter hosts tons of conservative pro-Trump voices. If you consider white supremacists and similar hate mongers to be “everyone relevant” Trump is in serious trouble.


they (conservatives) will say "I got banned MERELY because I DISAGREED with a liberal"


but if you actually read what they posted.....
"the only good liberal is a dead liberal"

Guess who did not get banned?

Screen_Shot_2018-08-05_at_4.49.12_PM.png


In fact, she got hired. The opposite of deplatforming.


well

as funny as that is.....

it isn't fair.....

Funny? That message was not intended as humor you moron.


sorry to trigger you, lucy....

:)
Oh, I agree on that. You just don't know how pissed we are. And "aren't going to take it anymore" means a whole lot more from the likes of me.
What's THAT supposed to mean? You're treading close to threatening violence on the board. You just said the likes of you would do more than what we've seen so far. That's why Trump is going down. The people are starting to see who's really in his corner and they don't like it. I here Siberia is something else in November. Perhaps you'd like it better there when the inevitable happens.
If it comes to civil war... I'm on Freedom of speech side. Heads up. I personally don't care if you like it or not.


" I'm on Freedom of speech side. "


you'll have to be more specific.

the left wants to silence the right

the right wants to silence everyone else....

are you a moderate?
I'm an independent. Otherwise I'm on the same side I'm always on... MINE.

Ummm... The Left isn't getting banned on Twitter, Facebook, ext... ext... So uhhh... Yeah.

Ummm....ya, they are...


The other people affected by such “shadow banning” in the past include Democrats, as mentioned in the Twitter blog post, other progressives, transgender users, Black Lives Matter activists, feminists, socialists and users that participated in culture-jamming campaigns against ISIL. The reason for all types of people on the political spectrum, and the folks using hashtags like #OpISIS, #OpIceISIS or spreading ISIS-chan, is because of a massively shared blocklist… that even ISIL contributed to 2015. That massive blocklist is so prevalent today, it is even used by Hollywood celebrities.


They have the regular rules for everyone.

And then the basic rule that more or less everyone relevant that supports the greatest president in history gets banned.

Twitter hosts tons of conservative pro-Trump voices. If you consider white supremacists and similar hate mongers to be “everyone relevant” Trump is in serious trouble.


they (conservatives) will say "I got banned MERELY because I DISAGREED with a liberal"


but if you actually read what they posted.....
"the only good liberal is a dead liberal"

Guess who did not get banned?

Screen_Shot_2018-08-05_at_4.49.12_PM.png


In fact, she got hired. The opposite of deplatforming.

hmmm...like half the names hear I have not heard of her...but a little research is helpful.

This article is from 2018, and states those bigoted/racist tweets were from up to five years prior, making that 2013. Were Theybanning people then? Don’t think the pressure was there yet for the tech industry to clean up. Since she stopped in 2013, why would they ban her now?

NYT hired her, well that is on them.

You have not heard of her?

These tweets have been repeatedly posted here.

I pay little attention to most tweets, they are background noise.

Nice virtue signaling. As an USMB mod, do you pay any attention to your board?







You mean do I read every thread? Hell no. I especially ignore celebrity crap stuff.

You could have read at least one... It's not celebrity stuff, this person is not a celebrity. All those threads are the same in intent as this one. No need to lie about it in an attempt to make you look more virtuous, you are not.
 
You could have read at least one... It's not celebrity stuff, this person is not a celebrity. All those threads are the same in intent as this one. No need to lie about it in an attempt to make you look more virtuous, you are not.

Then who the hell is she and why am I supposed to care about her enough to follow her? She isn’t a politician, she does not create policy, her primary purpose seems to be to attract obsessive like you.
 
Absolutely unacceptable. The civilization haters are at it again.

Many people have been banned from youtube for the crime of having the wrong (pro president Trump) opinion also. I suppose everyone knew this was coming, the left can not be negotiated with... but... are the conservatives going to finally do something about it or just continue losing with style?
That's what happens when you don't play nice. You support a 70 year old child and, like children, sometimes they need their hands slapped.
So, what do we do with all these criminal children throwing a tantrum in the streets and burning shit?

Trump has fostered an "anything goes" culture and now we're seeing the results. People are mad as hell and aren't going to take it anymore. I may not agree with everything they do, but the blame rests solidly at Trump's feet.


Yeah, the leftist mobs roving around looting, destroying, and shooting are totally Trump's fault.

You people are fucking loons.
 
You could have read at least one... It's not celebrity stuff, this person is not a celebrity. All those threads are the same in intent as this one. No need to lie about it in an attempt to make you look more virtuous, you are not.

Then who the hell is she and why am I supposed to care about her enough to follow her? She isn’t a politician, she does not create policy, her primary purpose seems to be to attract obsessive like you.

You are supposed to care because she wants to cancel your race, and is hired by your news media. It is not very difficult. Certainly it is much more relevant than the news stories you dug up.
 
You could have read at least one... It's not celebrity stuff, this person is not a celebrity. All those threads are the same in intent as this one. No need to lie about it in an attempt to make you look more virtuous, you are not.

Then who the hell is she and why am I supposed to care about her enough to follow her? She isn’t a politician, she does not create policy, her primary purpose seems to be to attract obsessive like you.

You are supposed to care because she wants to cancel your race, and is hired by your news media. It is not very difficult. Certainly it is much more relevant than the news stories you dug up.
:lol:

I am not so insecure that my identity is defined by race, or that 7 or more year old tweets will threaten me. I am sure you feel that way.
 
Twitter hosts tons of conservative pro-Trump voices. If you consider white supremacists and similar hate mongers to be “everyone relevant” Trump is in serious trouble.
It's more problematic than that... Watch the Rogan vids.
 
You could have read at least one... It's not celebrity stuff, this person is not a celebrity. All those threads are the same in intent as this one. No need to lie about it in an attempt to make you look more virtuous, you are not.

Then who the hell is she and why am I supposed to care about her enough to follow her? She isn’t a politician, she does not create policy, her primary purpose seems to be to attract obsessive like you.

You are supposed to care because she wants to cancel your race, and is hired by your news media. It is not very difficult. Certainly it is much more relevant than the news stories you dug up.
:lol:

I am not so insecure that my identity is defined by race, or that 7 or more year old tweets will threaten me. I am sure you feel that way.

Your insecurities which based on the constant omnipresent virtue signaling are numerous, are irrelevant.

She does not agree with you that you are not defined by your race, and she has a problem with that race.

Oh but you don't define yourself by your race. That is so, so good. Someone give this woman a cookie! Virtue, virtue!!
 
You could have read at least one... It's not celebrity stuff, this person is not a celebrity. All those threads are the same in intent as this one. No need to lie about it in an attempt to make you look more virtuous, you are not.

Then who the hell is she and why am I supposed to care about her enough to follow her? She isn’t a politician, she does not create policy, her primary purpose seems to be to attract obsessive like you.

You are supposed to care because she wants to cancel your race, and is hired by your news media. It is not very difficult. Certainly it is much more relevant than the news stories you dug up.
:lol:

I am not so insecure that my identity is defined by race, or that 7 or more year old tweets will threaten me. I am sure you feel that way.

Your insecurities which based on the constant omnipresent virtue signaling are numerous, are irrelevant.

She does not agree with you that you are not defined by your race, and she has a problem with that race.

Oh but you don't define yourself by your race. That is so, so good. Someone give this woman a cookie! Virtue, virtue!!
She can think what she wants, she seems to hold you in thrall despite having no power over you.

This virtue signaling. You keep saying it over and over. I do not think you know what means. You’ll do better just defending your white supremacists and bemoaning the behavior of a private business.
 
Absolutely unacceptable. The civilization haters are at it again.

Many people have been banned from youtube for the crime of having the wrong (pro president Trump) opinion also. I suppose everyone knew this was coming, the left can not be negotiated with... but... are the conservatives going to finally do something about it or just continue losing with style?
That's what happens when you don't play nice. You support a 70 year old child and, like children, sometimes they need their hands slapped.
So, what do we do with all these criminal children throwing a tantrum in the streets and burning shit?

Trump has fostered an "anything goes" culture and now we're seeing the results. People are mad as hell and aren't going to take it anymore. I may not agree with everything they do, but the blame rests solidly at Trump's feet.

Mad at what? Phantom racism.
 
Absolutely unacceptable. The civilization haters are at it again.



Many people have been banned from youtube for the crime of having the wrong (pro president Trump) opinion also. I suppose everyone knew this was coming, the left can not be negotiated with... but... are the conservatives going to finally do something about it or just continue losing with style?

This is a good sign. It shows how desperate the Democrats are.
 
Absolutely unacceptable. The civilization haters are at it again.

Many people have been banned from youtube for the crime of having the wrong (pro president Trump) opinion also. I suppose everyone knew this was coming, the left can not be negotiated with... but... are the conservatives going to finally do something about it or just continue losing with style?
That's what happens when you don't play nice. You support a 70 year old child and, like children, sometimes they need their hands slapped.
So, what do we do with all these criminal children throwing a tantrum in the streets and burning shit?

Trump has fostered an "anything goes" culture and now we're seeing the results. People are mad as hell and aren't going to take it anymore. I may not agree with everything they do, but the blame rests solidly at Trump's feet.

Mad at what? Phantom racism.


It's projection, people are mad at the leftist who actually DO anti-American things. Trump's words only trigger incompetent idiots like Mac.
 

Cambridge professor tweets white lives don't matter. Gets exalted and Cambridge issues a response that they never fire their faculty promoting freedom of speech. Of course, only as long as it is far left speech.

These demons are what Coyote and other ultra far left extremists are defending. It is unacceptable.
 
You could have read at least one... It's not celebrity stuff, this person is not a celebrity. All those threads are the same in intent as this one. No need to lie about it in an attempt to make you look more virtuous, you are not.

Then who the hell is she and why am I supposed to care about her enough to follow her? She isn’t a politician, she does not create policy, her primary purpose seems to be to attract obsessive like you.

You are supposed to care because she wants to cancel your race, and is hired by your news media. It is not very difficult. Certainly it is much more relevant than the news stories you dug up.
:lol:

I am not so insecure that my identity is defined by race, or that 7 or more year old tweets will threaten me. I am sure you feel that way.

Your insecurities which based on the constant omnipresent virtue signaling are numerous, are irrelevant.

She does not agree with you that you are not defined by your race, and she has a problem with that race.

Oh but you don't define yourself by your race. That is so, so good. Someone give this woman a cookie! Virtue, virtue!!
She can think what she wants, she seems to hold you in thrall despite having no power over you.

This virtue signaling. You keep saying it over and over. I do not think you know what means. You’ll do better just defending your white supremacists and bemoaning the behavior of a private business.

Yes, she can think what she wants, Americans and pro first world people can't. Finally you are starting to get it.

Do you think you represent any kind of supremacy? Being as full of soy as possible is not supremacy, it is inferiomacy. You have debunked all illusions of white supremacy right here on the spot, so stop worrying about it.
 

Cambridge professor tweets white lives don't matter. Gets exalted and Cambridge issues a response that they never fire their faculty promoting freedom of speech. Of course, only as long as it is far left speech.

These demons are what Coyote and other ultra far left extremists are defending. It is unacceptable.


What you don’t understand (other than that is the UK) is that private entities have no obligation to free speech. They can, within reason, impose whatever codes of conduct they think appropriate. Free speech rights really only applies to what the government can do to you.
 

Cambridge professor tweets white lives don't matter. Gets exalted and Cambridge issues a response that they never fire their faculty promoting freedom of speech. Of course, only as long as it is far left speech.

These demons are what Coyote and other ultra far left extremists are defending. It is unacceptable.


What you don’t understand (other than that is the UK) is that private entities have no obligation to free speech. They can, within reason, impose whatever codes of conduct they think appropriate. Free speech rights really only applies to what the government can do to you.

Who is not understanding here? Where was legal conduct brought up? That's right nowhere...

These operations are anti-free speech and quite likely illegal since they are acting like publishers yet claiming to be platforms.

What is being highlighted here is how utterly anti-American leftists are, and how they are impossible to negotiate with. Keep up... The professor was promoted after her comments.
 

Forum List

Back
Top