meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 23,809
- 20,918
- 2,290
Would you reject this signature match?Again. the time the data shows simply is not enough time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would you reject this signature match?Again. the time the data shows simply is not enough time.
Would you reject this signature match?
![]()
That is irrelevant, just like you.Would you reject this signature match?
![]()
And if the ID had the signature on the top, and his ballot envelope had the signature on the bottom.All federal elections should require ID
Are you waiving the white flag?That is irrelevant, just like you.
And if the ID had the signature on the top, and his ballot envelope had the signature on the bottom.
Would you reject that ballot?
I am doing no such thing. It is Maricopa's actions in question, not my opinion on a signature. you are deflecting because you are to dumb to argue coherently. That is your problem, not mine.Are you waiving the white flag?
I gave you two signatures and asked if they were a election match?
Are those signatures from the same person or not?
Fascism is leftist you dumb whale. Right wing is NO government.
Your reference is a blog....and it's horseshit.
She presented plenty of new evidence.
She showed that as many as 300,000 mail-in ballots weren't properly verified for signatures.
None of them were rejected even when thousands of signatures didn't match.
So you would accept a forged ID, where the person got the picture from facebook, or some similar source, but had to make up a non-matching signature.Not unless the picture doesn't match
You are saying they didn't have enough time because you claim they had six seconds "on average". Without taking into account where there can be a number of signatures that match on a quick glance, and others that were a match, and yet rejected.I am doing no such thing. It is Maricopa's actions in question, not my opinion on a signature. you are deflecting because you are to dumb to argue coherently. That is your problem, not mine.
So you would accept a forged ID, where the person got the picture from facebook, or some similar source, but had to make up a non-matching signature.
They needed a number that exceeded the margin of victory. Like when Trump told Raffensperger he needed 11,780 votes.What was her evidence 300K ballots weren't verified...?
They needed a number that exceeded the margin of victory. Like when Trump told Raffensperger he needed 11,780 votes.
Every state issues many ID's, from professional ID's to drivers licenses and non-driving ID cards. The only way to spot a fake card, is to know what a real one looks like. And people checking ID's don't have examples to compare them with.You crack me up, you just live in your own land of self delusion.
You don't know how to check an ID? Seriously?
Every state issues many ID's, from professional ID's to drivers licenses and non-driving ID cards. The only way to spot a fake card, is to know what a real one looks like. And people checking ID's don't have examples to compare them with.
![]()
Not all government issued ID's have/had security features.It's not like they have things like water marks or scanners. Oh wait, they do ....
i would not accept that ID. you cannot read the personal info nor see the pic clearly. karen wuz robbed.Not all government issued ID's have/had security features.
![]()
Not all government issued ID's have/had security features.
![]()