Is Voter Fraud Rampant? @p@triot Says Yes, the data says “no”.

[jacksonlamb]

So many words, so much BS.

No BS. Almost no voter fraud at all.

 

[P@triot]

So many words, so much BS.

She’s so thoroughly defeated by facts, at this point all she can do is her immature antics

 

[P@triot]

You could post links here showing your "proof".

Hungry for links, are you CC? Look at this bombshell

Thread 'California Sheriff Seizes Half Million Ballots in Voter Fraud Investigation'

Mar 22, 2026

We all know that voter fraud is massive.

Democrats stealing elections while inundating the nation with tens-of-million of illegals who can get driver's licenses in many states, and who can vote in local and state elections in several states. And when asked how they determine which election those aliens can vote in, they refuse to answer. See:

Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco has launched an investigation into a potential discrepancy in the number of ballots cast in last year’s special election.

On one hand, the Riverside County registrar of...​

• excalibur
• Replies: 66
• Forum: Current Events

• 
• 
• 

 

[jacksonlamb]

No one knows anything like "voter fraud is massive."

What is "massive" is MAGA propaganda.

 

[candycorn]

She’s so thoroughly defeated by facts, at this point all she can do is her immature antics

I spotted you 10,000 instances of genuine voter fraud for each of the 1620 instances referenced by your source; not my source...YOUR SOURCE. I do this even though nearly a quarter of YOUR SOURCE is convictions for registration attempts. Clearly if someone was convicted of fraudulent registration...the vote was never cast.... But I ignored that and gave you 1620 X 10,000. When compared to just Presidential elections, it equals far less than 1% of the total votes cast over 22 cycles.

I mathematically proved your allegation of "rampant" voter fraud is as impotent as you are.

 

[P@triot]

No one knows anything like "voter fraud is massive."

WTF does that even mean?!?

Why are all liberals illiterate? Why? School is not only free in this country, it’s mandatory. So there are no excuses.

As if that’s not bad enough, they all abuse substances and then post stuff that isn’t even a coherent sentence.

 

[jacksonlamb]

WTF does that even mean?!?

Why are all liberals illiterate? Why? School is not only free in this country, it’s mandatory. So there are no excuses.

As if that’s not bad enough, they all abuse substances and then post stuff that isn’t even a coherent sentence.

There is no massive voter fraud, you illiterate goofball.

 

[westwall]

There is no massive voter fraud, you illiterate goofball.

Facts in evidence say otherwise, you ignorant toad.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Facts in evidence say otherwise, you ignorant toad.

Heritage foundation, as you well know, says voter fraud ranges from .0003 to .0006.

 

[LibertyWeeps]

The most heinously evil people controlling politicians are the ones who also control companies that produce "polls" and "statistics" to be published so they have it "in writing"........which literally means nothing in reality.

I was told back in high school by a very intelligent teacher, "Never believe anything you read. Believe your own research".
He also told us those with the most money are in power, and those in power LIE in order to create the "truth" and the "history" that THEY want us believeing.

And since then, I don't believe anything written or published in any form.

If I'm interested in the subject, I will do my own research. And most of the time, if I wait long enough, the research comes to me.
Either way, I win, simply because I don't believe anything anyone says, unless they've proven themselves to be trustworthy.
Which is a rarity nowadays.

Books are peoples OPINIONS.
News media are CORPORATE LIES.
Magazines are PROPAGANDA.

Today, the only people spouting truths are comedians and self-employed and self-published researchers and old-fashioned journalists.
The people and entities SUPPOSED to be telling the public the truths are the ones outright lying to us with every breath they take and every word they speak.

 

[westwall]

Heritage foundation, as you well know, says voter fraud ranges from .0003 to .0006.

What's funny is everytime someone actually looks for the fraud....they find it.

Far higher than your fake numbers.

 

[candycorn]

Facts in evidence say otherwise, you ignorant toad.

Feel free to list the facts....

 

[jacksonlamb]

What's funny is everytime someone actually looks for the fraud....they find it.

Far higher than your fake numbers.

No, they don't. You need to stop looking stupid. And heritage numbers are not fake. Your comments are, though.

 

[westwall]

No, they don't. You need to stop looking stupid. And heritage numbers are not fake. Your comments are, though.

Liar, liar...pants on fire!

 

[jacksonlamb]

Liar, liar...pants on fire!

Goofball.

 

[DGS49]

The "beauty" of the mail-in voting push in 2020 was NOT to allay the fears that voters might be infected with the Corona Virus when going to the polls, although that is what it was sold as. The scam was created and pushed - solely by Democrats - because it made rampant fraud possible. and UNPROVABLE.

You send out ballots to every registered voter, knowing that only a relatively small percentage of them will be legitimately used, but also that MOST PEOPLE WILL NOT USE THEM. There are registered voters who almost never vote. So these ballots can be filled out fraudulently, with little chance that the fraud will be discovered.

THEN YOU CAN CLAIM THAT THERE WAS NO FRAUD, and nobody can prove you wrong!

"2000 Mules." It was never actually debunked. Deal with it. The 2020 election was stolen with fraudulent mail-in and Ballot Box votes.

The "proof" of the 2020 fraud COULD have been determined by doing a random sampling of mail-in and ballot box votes, contacting the named voter, and confirming that the votes were legitimately cast. It would not take a huge number of contacts to make the case, one way or another. But NOBODY EVER DID IT. Because the Democrats controlled the system in most States, and they knew what the survey would show.

 

[jacksonlamb]

The "beauty" of the mail-in voting push in 2020 was NOT to allay the fears that voters might be infected with the Corona Virus when going to the polls, although that is what it was sold as. The scam was created and pushed - solely by Democrats - because it made rampant fraud possible. and UNPROVABLE.

You send out ballots to every registered voter, knowing that only a relatively small percentage of them will be legitimately used, but also that MOST PEOPLE WILL NOT USE THEM. There are registered voters who almost never vote. So these ballots can be filled out fraudulently, with little chance that the fraud will be discovered.

THEN YOU CAN CLAIM THAT THERE WAS NO FRAUD, and nobody can prove you wrong!

"2000 Mules." It was never actually debunked. Deal with it. The 2020 election was stolen with fraudulent mail-in and Ballot Box votes.

The "proof" of the 2020 fraud COULD have been determined by doing a random sampling of mail-in and ballot box votes, contacting the named voter, and confirming that the votes were legitimately cast. It would not take a huge number of contacts to make the case, one way or another. But NOBODY EVER DID IT. Because the Democrats controlled the system in most States, and they knew what the survey would show.

There was no rampant fraud except in the minds of the goofy.

 

[westwall]

There was no rampant fraud except in the minds of the goofy.

Tell that to poor kameltoe who couldn't find those 15,000,000 vegetable Joe voters, even though she was running against Hitler hisself!

 

[jacksonlamb]

Tell that to poor kameltoe who couldn't find those 15,000,000 vegetable Joe voters, even though she was running against Hitler hisself!

You mixed up the tale. It was Trump trying to get 11,000 voters in GA.

 

[westwall]

You mixed up the tale. It was Trump trying to get 11,000 voters in GA.

Oh, yeah..where the Fulton County election commission has been caught red handed committing vote fraud and are now desperately trying to hide the evidence?

You're too funny.