Judge Rules trump Campaign's Nondisclosure Agreement Is Invalid

[struth]

This is interesting. Those NDAs people signed to work with trump in 2016 are not valid and they can speak freely.

I think it's funny that an administration that claimed to be so transparent went to such lengths to prevent their own workers from speaking freely.

Judge rules Trump campaign's nondisclosure agreement is invalid

The NDAs were for the campaing, not the administration. Trump Admin was very transparent...especially compared to the media blackout we are seeing by the Fascist like policies by Xiden-Harris

It was also for his staff.
Upset by a tell-all book, President Donald Trump has again threatened a former staffer by noting that they signed a non-disclosure agreement, a move that historians say is unprecedented.

Trump's Non-Disclosure Agreements Show a Problem With Loyalty

He again threatened a former staffer over one

time.com

This case is about the NDA he had with his campaign staff. It says so in the link in the OP

I will say the propagandist in your link is quite funny..."threatened" - really? Over reminding someone of a contract they signed? It's a threat to do that now?

 

[pyetro]

This is interesting. Those NDAs people signed to work with trump in 2016 are not valid and they can speak freely.

I think it's funny that an administration that claimed to be so transparent went to such lengths to prevent their own workers from speaking freely.

Judge rules Trump campaign's nondisclosure agreement is invalid

Corrupt Trump.

 

[OldLady]

This is interesting. Those NDAs people signed to work with trump in 2016 are not valid and they can speak freely.

I think it's funny that an administration that claimed to be so transparent went to such lengths to prevent their own workers from speaking freely.

Judge rules Trump campaign's nondisclosure agreement is invalid

The NDAs were for the campaing, not the administration. Trump Admin was very transparent...especially compared to the media blackout we are seeing by the Fascist like policies by Xiden-Harris

It was also for his staff.
Upset by a tell-all book, President Donald Trump has again threatened a former staffer by noting that they signed a non-disclosure agreement, a move that historians say is unprecedented.

Trump's Non-Disclosure Agreements Show a Problem With Loyalty

He again threatened a former staffer over one

time.com

This case is about the NDA he had with his campaign staff. It says so in the link in the OP

I will say the propagandist in your link is quite funny..."threatened" - really? Over reminding someone of a contract they signed? It's a threat to do that now?

Legal fees.

 

[struth]

This is interesting. Those NDAs people signed to work with trump in 2016 are not valid and they can speak freely.

I think it's funny that an administration that claimed to be so transparent went to such lengths to prevent their own workers from speaking freely.

Judge rules Trump campaign's nondisclosure agreement is invalid

The NDAs were for the campaing, not the administration. Trump Admin was very transparent...especially compared to the media blackout we are seeing by the Fascist like policies by Xiden-Harris

It was also for his staff.
Upset by a tell-all book, President Donald Trump has again threatened a former staffer by noting that they signed a non-disclosure agreement, a move that historians say is unprecedented.

Trump's Non-Disclosure Agreements Show a Problem With Loyalty

He again threatened a former staffer over one

time.com

This case is about the NDA he had with his campaign staff. It says so in the link in the OP

I will say the propagandist in your link is quite funny..."threatened" - really? Over reminding someone of a contract they signed? It's a threat to do that now?

Legal fees.

what about them?

 

[colfax_m]

I will say the propagandist in your link is quite funny..."threatened" - really? Over reminding someone of a contract they signed? It's a threat to do that now?

It's contradictory to say the campaign was super transparent and also they made everyone sign nondisclosure agreements that were so broad as to be struck down by the courts.

 

[struth]

I will say the propagandist in your link is quite funny..."threatened" - really? Over reminding someone of a contract they signed? It's a threat to do that now?

It's contradictory to say the campaign was super transparent and also they made everyone sign nondisclosure agreements that were so broad as to be struck down by the courts.

I never said the campaign was...not sure anyone did.

 

[colfax_m]

I never said the campaign was...not sure anyone did.

Not sure why you claim the administration was transparent either.

They had their own NDAs.

Trump NDAs can’t silence ex-White House officials: legal experts

In a provocative column Sunday night, the Washington Post reported that the Trump administration required senior White House officials to sign agreements forbidding them to disclose any confidential information about their work – not just during their time in office but...

www.reuters.com

Which were again probably not legal.

 

[struth]

I never said the campaign was...not sure anyone did.

Not sure why you claim the administration was transparent either.

They had their own NDAs.

Trump NDAs can’t silence ex-White House officials: legal experts

In a provocative column Sunday night, the Washington Post reported that the Trump administration required senior White House officials to sign agreements forbidding them to disclose any confidential information about their work – not just during their time in office but...

www.reuters.com

Which were again probably not legal.

What do you mean "either" that would imply I said the campaign was...I didn't...I don't expect a campaign to be, and would be surprised that a campaign didn't have NDA...why wouild I want someone working for me, trying to win an election, then leave or get fired, and go to the other campaign and give up a strategy or plan?

The admin was greatly more transparent then we are seeing today...press conferences....press access etc...way more.

Moreover, your link states this: “were never asked or required to sign NDAs with $10 million clauses. Beyond that, we do not discuss security or personnel matters.”

With that said, Trump putting restrictions on former employees is nothing new in the White House...Clinton and Obama did as well Could NDA follow Trump to White House?

 

[LuckyDuck]

Politicians on both sides of the fence have arranged NDA's, most because of indiscretions. What can you say, many men can't keep their privates out of women who give in to them and when they have power, they figure NDA's will protect them.
No matter what the judge rules, it won't affect Trump.
I find it interesting that even though Trump is no longer president, the idiots on the left, can't focus on much else (like the idiot currently in the White House). The left's Communist hatred of opposing political parties is second to none.

I do believe if there is criminality involved, NDA's can legally be broken, just to report information about the crime, though.

Agreed. However, if the NDA was just a tryst, that's a private matter between him, his wife and the other woman (or man). But, knowing the left, no matter what the NDA reflects, the leftist media will be sure to drag it out.

 

[BULLDOG]

Politicians on both sides of the fence have arranged NDA's, most because of indiscretions. What can you say, many men can't keep their privates out of women who give in to them and when they have power, they figure NDA's will protect them.
No matter what the judge rules, it won't affect Trump.
I find it interesting that even though Trump is no longer president, the idiots on the left, can't focus on much else (like the idiot currently in the White House). The left's Communist hatred of opposing political parties is second to none.

I do believe if there is criminality involved, NDA's can legally be broken, just to report information about the crime, though.

Agreed. However, if the NDA was just a tryst, that's a private matter between him, his wife and the other woman (or man). But, knowing the left, no matter what the NDA reflects, the leftist media will be sure to drag it out.

I understand your concern. Since an NDA can only be broken in the case of criminality, you would much prefer that criminality to be ignored by the press. If I was a trump supporter, I would want his criminal behavior ignored too.

 

[MarcATL]

MAKES








NO









DIFFERENCE








YOU








CAN








NEVER









BEAT HIM

trump



has




already




been



sorely



defeated.

 

[lennypartiv]

What's he hiding? What's going on with him and his family that everything about them personally has to be kept a deep secret?

Why are you so concerned?

 

[lennypartiv]

This is interesting. Those NDAs people signed to work with trump in 2016 are not valid and they can speak freely.
I think it's funny that an administration that claimed to be so transparent went to such lengths to prevent their own workers from speaking freely.

I'm sure the Deep State will be looking to flip more on the Trump team.

 

[toobfreak]

MAKES








NO









DIFFERENCE








YOU








CAN








NEVER









BEAT HIM

trump



has




already




been



sorely



defeated.

Must be why they are still counting the ballots while democrats shit themselves that he can still do anything he wants from take Nancy's job all the way to moving back into the White House!