'Couple of things I know. They believed in witches and thought the earth was flat. That's quite enough for me.
You said believed in witches. If only your past term was accurate.
That is how dumb and retarded some Christians still are.
Regards
DL
Catholic Church law requires that every diocese has at least one specially-trained priest who can perform exorcisms. They still believe that stuff is real. Shucks....the whole tale is based on a ghost so why not?
They should get over that shit and give the money to needy and starving children. I think I read that more than 12,000 children die each day from malnutrition and starvation.
While a churches which are supposed to look to the poor spends lavishly on themselves.
God damned religions all.
Regards
DL
I sympathize with your frustration over the apparent hypocrisy of established Christian churches; in fairness, we ought to concede that the radical teachings of that rabbi from the Galilee called Jesus didn't make it into the Roman Empire's official religion. It isn't just giving to the poor either. Think of Jesus' words about turning the other cheek or not worrying about tomorrow's food and clothing. No government has ever put that kind of extreme vision into its official documents and never will.
so true-----no government has imposed the "DEPRIVATION" upon itself that the
very standard teachings of Jesus seem to demand..... even the communists lived
it up whilst starving the people of the country side-------even MAO did so. It is
not entirely clear just how skimpy were the living conditions of Jesus, himself, back
then. -----poverty to the point of starvation was rife in those days. At the time of Jesus-----the people who did the socialistic thing lived out in desert communities----
not really accomplishing anything but LIVING a monastic style of life THEMSELVES. It is possible that John the Baptist came from such a community but I (no expert me---but....) see no evidence that Jesus was an ESSENE.
Dear
irosie91 and
Fishlore
Thank you also for your interesting input here on this thread.
What a progressive Christian pointed out to me just yesterday
was it takes a SECULAR govt to truly have religious freedom to practice faiths as intended.
His argument was (a) If these were forced by govt then whose faith would be endorsed? this would destroy the ability to practice
and (b) as a Muslim advocate with CAIR pointed out,
true faith has to by nature be FREELY chosen in order to be REAL.
if it is forced, it is not real faith, but fake. Clearly it cannot be real if it is forced.
That is why there is "no compulsion in religion" in order to practice it consistently
when applied to Christianity, this is saying the only way for people to learn to live freely and unselfishly
is to CHOOSE to do this. Not to have it forced by outside authority, or else that's not taking personal responsibility and choice of one's own actions.
That's relying on something or someone else to make moral decisions for you.
Now
GreatestIam is worried that just because I or others here believe
Jesus means something good, it appears the assumption is we are "relying on some false teachings indoctrinated by others"
to come up with our decisions.
That's not true for me anyway; the understanding I received about God, Jesus and the Bible
did not come from any church or any teaching out there. In fact, I had to go out and search very hard
to find people who could explain or agree with a more universal understanding than what is being taught traditionally.
So that's why I explain Christ Jesus as Restorative Justice,
the Old Testament as living by the letter of the law (which even
GreatestIam is contesting as oppressive and conflicted)
and the New Testament as living by the spirit of the law (which
GreatestIam doesn't quite grasp due to being stuck in the OT and what's wrong
with that part of human history instead of focusing on the solutions in our future).
I don't go along with the "false indoctrinations which I agree with
GreatestIam are abusive"
No govt can compel people to change their spiritual beliefs.
That has to be done by free will and reason, we choose to forgive what is blocking our minds
from understanding. The changes and reforms happen naturally.
then after we change how we want to do things, we can change how we use our
church, state, school, business and nonprofit structures and resources to implement change globally.
But this has to come from we the people first, by free will in order to be real and sustainable. Not top down change forced by govt, that isn't freely chosen so it won't work or last. That is not the role of govt. The contracts are supposed to reflect the consent of the governed, not dictate terms to people. That has never worked; because people have free will, we want the right to consent and dissent, and will form contracts based on that. That's just human nature.
Abusing govt to force people leads to oppression and war, until we better organize, educate and use resources to resolve problems and establish justice by democratic means that reflect the consent (ie free will / free choice) of the people affected. Not try to squash conflict by force, but resolve them peaceably so solutions are long lasting and effective.
We are meant to perfect our human nature to function in society in harmony.
Too bad
GreatestIam keeps harping on the problems, and even accusing me of believing or promoting
problems instead of solutions. If we focused on solutions, I'd probably agree with
GreatestIam to get rid of the false teachings we both seem to be against.
Thank you all for your comments that are very helpful. I will try to invite my friend to come join us on here!