I don't think I've ever read a single word from Nader on global warming. What is your opinion on the conclusions of the IPCC?
James Hansen Wishes he Wasn’t So Right about Global Warming
- Thread starter abu afak
- Start date
I didn't specify global warming. The
calculations are way beyond me and
I am always leery of PROJECTIONS INTO
THE FUTURE. The AIDS virus was
covered about 1981. Projections
at that time were that the entire
population of New York City would be
dead in the gutter by the year 2000.
As a kid we got told "look forward to
4 inches of space for each person----
and SOYLENT GREEN---I even
'ON THE BEACH"
When you commented that CO2 was the basis of life and that many "schmucks" on this board don't understand organic chemistry, I assumed you were being critical of attempts to reduce or even eliminat human CO2 emissions. Were you?
Which calculations?
If I give you a short list of reactants and tell you I'm going to mix them in a beaker at STP, do you not think you could project into the future and tell me what chemical reactions will take place and what the products will be?
Covered? I don't know what you're saying here.
Was the entire population of New York City exchanging bodily fluids? Who made such a projection?
Human population is still growing. We could get there.
You left out a verb. You read it? You watched it?
I was hoping that someone with at the very least a good education in chemistry could provide us all some good foundational info about the greenhouse effect. Posters here believe a wide range of things about CO2 and infrared. Some people accept the standard theory, others believe it is vastly overstated believing that even 420 ppm is just too little material to have warmed the entire planet. Others believe the positive feedbacks from water vapor are grossly overstated. Do you have an opinion about the greenhouse effect and how much of a threat is actually posed by manmade global warming? If not, can you explain to us what you meant by your comments about CO2 being the basis of life and schmucks ignorant of organic chemistry?
no I have no opinion----someone played with my preceding post
Why? It's not a chemical process.
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 22,301
- 13,522
- 2,288
- Banned
- #447
Actually you just need the actual data...
Key claim against global warming evaporates
Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.
www.nbcnews.com
"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling"
Atmospheric Co2 went up, atmospheric temps did not...
THEORY REJECTED
It's not theory. It's reality. It's just physics. You make people who disagree with AGW look bad.Actually you just need the actual data...
Key claim against global warming evaporates
Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.
"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling"
Atmospheric Co2 went up, atmospheric temps did not...
THEORY REJECTED
My apologies then. Have an excellent day.
abu afak
ALLAH SNACKBAR!
- Mar 3, 2006
- 8,062
- 2,789
- 315
- Thread starter
- #452
Exxon scientists predicted global warming with 'shocking skill ...
Harvard Gazettehttps://news.harvard.edu › gazette › story › 2023/01
Jan 12, 2023 — Research shows that company modeled and predicted global warming with 'shocking skill and accuracy' starting in the 1970s. Projections created ...
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years AgoScientific American
https://www.scientificamerican.com › article › exxon-k...
Oct 26, 2015 — A new investigation shows the oil company understood the science before it became a public issue and spent millions to promote ...
Exxon Scientists Predicted Global Warming, Even as ...
The New York Timeshttps://www.nytimes.com › 2023/01/12 › climate › exx...
Jan 12, 2023 — Global warming projections made or recorded by ExxonMobil scientists between 1977 and 2003 closely tracked with observed temperature increases.
Exxon's Own Research Confirmed Fossil Fuels' Role in ...
Inside Climate Newshttps://insideclimatenews.org › News
May 2, 2024 — David, the head of Exxon Research, told a global warming conference financed by Exxon in October 1982 that “few people doubt that the world ...
Assessing ExxonMobil's global warming projections
Science | AAAS
https://www.science.org › doi › science.abk0063
by G Supran · 2023 · Cited by 152 — Accurate and skillful climate modeling. Overall, ExxonMobil's global warming projections closely track subsequent observed temperature increases ...
Exxon climate predictions were accurate decades ago. Still ...
NPRhttps://www.npr.org › 2023/01/12 › exxon-climate-pre...
Jan 12, 2023 — Exxon's climate research decades back painted an accurate picture of global warming, according to a new scientific paper.
Revealed: Exxon made 'breathtakingly' accurate climate ...
The Guardianhttps://www.theguardian.com › business › jan › exxon-...
Jan 12, 2023 — The oil giant Exxon privately “predicted global warming correctly and skilfully” only to then spend decades publicly rubbishing such science ...
Exxon's Own Models Predicted Global Warming
Scientific American
https://www.scientificamerican.com › article › exxons-o...
Jan 13, 2023 — Exxon's Own Models Predicted Global Warming—It Ignored Them. Scientists working for the oil giant Exxon in the 1970s and 1980s estimated ...
Exxon predicted global warming with remarkable accuracy
CNBC
https://www.cnbc.com › 2023/01/12 › exxon-predicted...
Jan 12, 2023 — "We now have airtight, unimpeachable evidence that ExxonMobil accurately predicted global warming years before it turned around and publicly ...
Exxon scientists knew almost exactly how bad climate ...
Fortunehttps://fortune.com › 2023/01/12 › exxon-scientists-clim...
Jan 12, 2023 — It “gives us airtight evidence that Exxon Mobil accurately predicted global warming years before, then turned around and attacked the science ...
`
1C per doubling of CO2. That’s it.
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Why don't you explain why solar is now the cheapest source of electricity in the world?
justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 33,998
- 26,832
- 2,905
They're only using the sales price for the energy they're
not counting in the construction and purchase or the refitting costs at end of equipment life which oftentimes cancels the ROI.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Democrat researcher asked swing voters to compare the 2 Political parties to animals ..- Started by yidnar
- Replies: 0
-
The Great Construction Scam: Why China’s Towers Are Doomed to Rot- Started by Mac-7
- Replies: 3
-
-
England is the system of Government Democrats will impose on us all. Stop them!!!- Started by Robert W
- Replies: 4
