James Hansen Wishes he Wasn’t So Right about Global Warming

[otto105]

The same "science" that says women can have penises?

Simp, what does the science say about that?

 

[martybegan]

Simp, what does the science say about that?

That it isn't possible?

Now you say it.

 

[ding]

A person who trust the science on the matter. Unlike you who has the bias of a toddler.

You don't know the science, dummy. Is Patrick Moore biased? Because He's making the same arguments I am making.

 

[otto105]

That it isn't possible?

Now you say it.

Hilarious

 

[otto105]

You don't know the science, dummy. Is Patrick Moore biased? Because He's making the same arguments I am making.

And he’d be wrong just like you, Climate toddler

 

[jc456]

Very hilarious since rooftop solar costs between 12-K to 17K.

Why the lie?

how many hours does it get to run for?

 

[jc456]

Simp, what does the science say about that?

women have va jay jays. Show me some that says penis

 

[ding]

And he’d be wrong just like you, Climate toddler

The geologic record says otherwise, dummy.

 

[martybegan]

Hilarious

You can't say it, because you are an indoctrinated lemming.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Exxon’s Own Research Confirmed Fossil Fuels’ Role in Global Warming Decades Ago​

Top executives were warned of possible catastrophe from greenhouse effect, then led efforts to block solutions.​

May 2, 2024

"...At a meeting in Exxon Corporation’s headquarters, a senior company scientist named James F. Black addressed an audience of powerful oilmen. Speaking without a text as he flipped through detailed slides, Black delivered a sobering message: carbon dioxide from the world’s use of fossil fuels would warm the planet and could eventually endanger humanity.

“In the first place, there is general Scientific Agreement that the most likely manner in which mankind is influencing the global climate is through carbon dioxide release from the burning of fossil fuels,” Black told Exxon’s Management Committee, according to a written version he recorded later.

It was July 1977 when Exxon’s leaders received this blunt assessment, well before most of the world had heard of the looming climate crisis.

A year later, Black, a top technical expert in Exxon’s Research & Engineering division, took an updated version of his presentation to a broader audience.
He warned Exxon scientists and managers that independent researchers estimated a doubling of the carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration in the atmosphere would increase average global temperatures by 2 to 3 degrees Celsius (4 to 5 degrees Fahrenheit), and as much as 10 degrees Celsius (18 degrees Fahrenheit) at the poles. Rainfall might get heavier in some regions, and other places might turn to desert."..."
[......]

Exxon’s Own Research Confirmed Fossil Fuels’ Role in Global Warming Decades Ago - Inside Climate News

Top executives were warned of possible catastrophe from greenhouse effect, then led efforts to block solutions.

insideclimatenews.org

'

John Tyndall discovered CO2 was a greenhouse gas a while back.
Did everyone forget until Exxon rediscovered that in 1977?

After Exxon hid the truth in 1977, how long did it take someone else to find out?

 

[otto105]

The geologic record says otherwise, dummy.

No, no it doesn’t.

Climate toddler.

 

[ding]

No, no it doesn’t.

Climate toddler.

Sure it does. The geologic record shows that for the last 3 million years when the northern hemisphere deglaciates the planet warms and when the northern hemisphere glaciates the planet cools. It's irrefutable.

 

[otto105]

Sure it does. The geologic record shows that for the last 3 million years when the northern hemisphere deglaciates the planet warms and when the northern hemisphere glaciates the planet cools. It's irrefutable.View attachment 1100814
View attachment 1100815

And that has what to do with CO2?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And that has what to do with CO2?

Exactly!

 

[ding]

And that has what to do with CO2?

That the majority of warming they are attributing to CO2 is in reality natural warming from a deglaciating northern hemisphere.

 

[otto105]

That the majority of warming they are attributing to CO2 is in reality natural warming from a deglaciating northern hemisphere.

No, it’s human burning of fossil fuels.

Climate toddler

 

[ding]

No, it’s human burning of fossil fuels.

Climate toddler

It's the northern hemisphere deglaciating.

Why is it 2C cooler than the last interglacial period which had 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2 than today? If CO2 is all powerful, why isn't it warmer today than it was during the last interglacial period?

 

[otto105]

That the majority of warming they are attributing to CO2 is in reality natural warming from a deglaciating northern hemisphere.

Who is?

Climate toddler.

 

[otto105]

It's the northern hemisphere deglaciating.

Why is it 2C cooler than the last interglacial period which had 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2 than today? If CO2 is all powerful, why isn't it warmer today than it was during the last interglacial period?

yes, because of the human caused climate change climate toddler.

 

[ding]

Who is?

Climate toddler.

The IPCC, dummy.