James Hansen Wishes he Wasn’t So Right about Global Warming

So every layer of an ice age glacier is 1 volume unit of H2O and 9 units of air initially. That gets compressed...

Post some real research that shows how much air is actually in the ice at 20 feet, 50 feet, 100 feet, etc.

Because you're a moron.


LOL!!!

When you compress a layer on top of a glacier, the gas does not vanish...

MORON
 
Does a cubic mile of ice, at 1000 feet below the surface, have 90% air in it?

Well, if the cubic mile of ice starts at 1000 ft below sea level, then it ends 4280 ft above sea level, and Antarctica has such.

And yeah, it has 90% air super compressed, since the "layer" started at the bottom multiple feet thick and then got compressed to under one inch.

Antarctica has at least 50 million cubic miles of air at today's surface air pressure trapped inside.
 
Antarctica has at least 50 million cubic miles of air at today's surface air pressure trapped inside.
You wouldn't by chance have a source for that would you? Or perhaps you could explain to us how that was calculated, since I'm fairly certain it originated completely within your skull.
 
You wouldn't by chance have a source for that would you? Or perhaps you could explain to us how that was calculated, since I'm fairly certain it originated completely within your skull.

He had a source, but the Jews hid it.
 
You wouldn't by chance have a source for that would you? Or perhaps you could explain to us how that was calculated, since I'm fairly certain it originated completely within your skull.


YOU find YOUR SOURCE and TELL US...
 
YOU find YOUR SOURCE and TELL US...
What we all find is that you have no source for any of this bullshit because you simply make it up in your exceedingly sick little mind.
 
What we all find is that you have no source for any of this bullshit because you simply make it up in your exceedingly sick little mind.


LOL!!!

You cannot refute anything.

All your side is doing now is asking for "links" from "experts" and YOU DO NOT HAVE ANY "LINKS" THAT REFUTE ONE WORD OF WHAT I'VE POSTED, NOT ONE....
 
LOL!!!

You cannot refute anything.

All your side is doing now is asking for "links" from "experts" and YOU DO NOT HAVE ANY "LINKS" THAT REFUTE ONE WORD OF WHAT I'VE POSTED, NOT ONE....
Your refute it yourself when you are unable to back up ANY of your claims. There is nothing left for us to do.
 
Your refute it yourself when you are unable to back up ANY of your claims. There is nothing left for us to do.


You cannot answer the questions without exposing Co2 as a non factor.

You already admitted the reason why the Antarctic has 9+ times the ice of the Arctic is about LAND not Co2.

Hence you admit LAND NEAR THE POLES controls the amount of ice on Earth.

BUSTED.

TOO CHICKEN TO ANSWER THE REST OF THE QUESTIONS....
 
You cannot answer the questions without exposing Co2 as a non factor.

You already admitted the reason why the Antarctic has 9+ times the ice of the Arctic is about LAND not Co2.

Hence you admit LAND NEAR THE POLES controls the amount of ice on Earth.

BUSTED.

TOO CHICKEN TO ANSWER THE REST OF THE QUESTIONS....
You're an ignorant, lying, antisemitic bigot. All the advice we have all heard about not wasting one's time arguing with a fool applies EXACTLY to EVERY discussion ANYONE has ever had with YOU.
 
You're an ignorant, lying, antisemitic bigot. All the advice we have all heard about not wasting one's time arguing with a fool applies EXACTLY to EVERY discussion ANYONE has ever had with YOU.


This is the Co2 FRAUD. When they finally answer the questions EMH has posted over and over, they admit the truth that Co2 does nothing, and then when confronted with that truth, they SPAZZ....
 
This is the Co2 FRAUD. When they finally answer the questions EMH has posted over and over, they admit the truth that Co2 does nothing, and then when confronted with that truth, they SPAZZ....
for the record----CO2 is the basis of life. Reading this messageboard I have come to
understand why so many schmucks flunk Organic chemistry
 
for the record----CO2 is the basis of life. Reading this messageboard I have come to
understand why so many schmucks flunk Organic chemistry


That's fine. The question is whether adding Co2 to the atmosphere warms the atmosphere...

The ONLY data we have on that issue said NO before being FUDGED in 2005



satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.
 
for the record----CO2 is the basis of life. Reading this messageboard I have come to
understand why so many schmucks flunk Organic chemistry
You passed organic chemistry?
 
Reject. They have confused a natural warming trend for AGW by assuming all warming is due to an incremental 120 ppm of atmospheric CO2 when the most it could have contributed is 0.5C.
 
Do you accept or reject AGW, or something in between?
Man contributes to the situation of the
planet and atmosphere----to a small extent. I am not sure if the contribution is as serious as Ralph Nader thought it is
 
Back
Top Bottom