Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 26,530
- 12,488
- 973
It was stated in the article, dipshit.still waiting for you to prove they exist,,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It was stated in the article, dipshit.still waiting for you to prove they exist,,
why did james pay back joe instead of paying the lawyer back where he got the money??It was stated in the article, dipshit.
It wasn’t the lawyers money, dipshit.why did james pay back joe instead of paying the lawyer back where he got the money??
the trust is where he got the money from not from joe directly,,It wasn’t the lawyers money, dipshit.
If it was not a loan, and there is little evidence that it was, what was the money for?Okay. So worst case scenario, which seems pretty unlikely, is that this wasn’t a loan.
How could that implicate Biden in anything nefarious?
It was a fucking loan you dipshitIf it was not a loan, and there is little evidence that it was, what was the money for?
Maybe there is an innocent explanation, but if so, why the lie about the loan?
then why didnt he [pay it back to the entity that he got it from?? and instead gave it directly to joe??It was a fucking loan you dipshit
LoL!It was a fucking loan you dipshit
Convincing argument? As if anything would convince you?LoL!
Is that really your idea of a convincing argument?
Describe all the evidence that it was a loan.
Go.
the facts are a trust loaned him the money and he paid joe back not the trust,, thats illegal money laundering,,Convincing argument? As if anything would convince you?
It’s the facts
Ummmthe facts are a trust loaned him the money and he paid joe back not the trust,, thats illegal money laundering,,
Actually it is.Ummm
No
That’s weird
how is it weird??Ummm
No
That’s weird
thats all youve done,,Keep throwing shit against the wall hoping something sticks
I won’t
Lesh, you are pretty useless as a poster. Just sayin' . . .Convincing argument? As if anything would convince you?
It’s the facts
Pretty funny coming from youLesh, you are pretty useless as a poster. Just sayin' . . .
That's what I'm asking you. What was the money for?If it was not a loan, and there is little evidence that it was, what was the money for?
Maybe there is an innocent explanation, but if so, why the lie about the loan?
It's a lawyer trust account. None of your links are relevant.the trust is where he got the money from not from joe directly,,
there are laws governing that,,
United States trust law - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
yeah because they dont exist,,It's a lawyer trust account. None of your links are relevant.