- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,028
- 47,214
- 2,180
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, if the assertion by SeaMajor is that my avatar has failed to persuade in some discussions on this venue.....well, he is right.
However, let's not presume that was the intent of any of my avatar's posts. He's ambitious and energetic, pro-active one might say. However, he recognizes that persuading the QAnon & MAGA fanboys that parade here is simply a bridge too far.
OK, that is just a general statement. More specifically, to our request for context and scale of Li'l bripat's charge that this prosecutor in question, Weissman, "... has a record of convicting innocent people, jackass.".......well, we simply do not have any data provided by Li'l 'bripat to substantiate his claim.
True he demonstrates, in post #1,537, his desire to prove a 'record of' of wrongful convictions, but......but that is not what is contained in Li'l bripat's submitted documentation. He asserts that some affidavits by opposing attorneys....the defendant attorney's in this case......prove wrongful conviction.
Not so.
As contained in Li'l bripat's post this is not a 'conviction' issue. It is opposing attorneys complaining about prosecutorial tactics that they didn't like. No conviction issue whatsoever. Even the defendant, Enron, is not party to this internecine food fight. It is between two opposing teams of attorneys. Further, these opposing attorney affidavits were rejected by the court. ("the courts refused to consider the affidavits sufficient to prove prosecutorial misconduct.)
So, while my avatar applaud's both Li'l bripat's and SeaMajor's enthusiasm and participation in this discussion.....we would still suggest a little more homework for each. And a little less QAnon histrionics.
Just sayin'