Why Alvin and not the Feds? Or, why Cohen and not Individual 1?

berg80

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2017
15,010
12,436
2,320
Because after all.......

Trump makes a desperate attempt to downplay illegal payments to women

President Donald Trump began his week by trying to downplay illegal hush payments to women made late in the 2016 presidential campaign ā€” ones that federal prosecutors now say he directed and coordinated ā€” as a mere ā€œsimple private transaction.ā€
Trump makes a desperate attempt to downplay illegal payments to women

However............

Inside Barrā€™s Effort to Undermine Prosecutors in N.Y.

Shortly after he became attorney general last year, William P. Barr set out to challenge a signature criminal case that touched President Trumpā€™s inner circle directly, and even the presidentā€™s own actions: the prosecution of Michael D. Cohen, Mr. Trumpā€™s longtime fixer.

The debate between Mr. Barr and the federal prosecutors who brought the case against Mr. Cohen was one of the first signs of a tense relationship that culminated last weekend in the abrupt ouster of Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States attorney in Manhattan. It also foreshadowed Mr. Barrā€™s intervention in the prosecutions of other associates of Mr. Trump.

By the time Mr. Barr was sworn into office in February, Mr. Cohen, who had paid hush money to an adult film star who said she had an affair with Mr. Trump, had already pleaded guilty and was set to begin a three-year prison sentence, all of which embarrassed and angered the president.

But Mr. Barr spent weeks in the spring of 2019 questioning the prosecutors over their decision to charge Mr. Cohen with violating campaign finance laws, according to people briefed on the matter.

Inside Barrā€™s Effort to Undermine Prosecutors in N.Y. (Published 2020)

Eventually, Billy the Bagman pushed to have the charges against Cohen dropped. From Berman's book..........."While Cohen had pleaded guilty, our office continued to pursue investigations related to other possible campaign finance violations. When Barr took over in Feb. of 2019, he not only tried to kill the ongoing investigations but...incredibly...suggested that Cohen's conviction on campaign finance charges be reversed."

Why?

Because Individual 1 was implicated in the same illegal campaign finance violations Cohen had plead guilty to.

Book: The DOJ almost implicated Trump more directly in a crime

It was a shocking enough document as it was. Donald Trumpā€™s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, had pleaded guilty to illegally concealing hush money paid to two women who were accusing Trump of extramarital affairs. The 2018 charging document implicated Trump, named as ā€œIndividual-1,ā€ notably by saying he attended a meeting about how he might quash any negative stories about his relationships.

And it might have implicated Trump even further, then-U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman now says ā€” were it not for the kind of politically tinged meddling that he says was endemic in the Trump Justice Department.

The New York Times last week briefly noted that Bermanā€™s new book alleges that a Justice Department official tried to get references to Trump removed from the Cohen charging document. And now that the book is out, we have Bermanā€™s fuller account of the events.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...-almost-implicated-trump-more-directly-crime/

Much has been made by people like me about how ugly things could get with respect to the DoJ should Trump be re-elected. In part based on what kind of retribution he has promised against those involved in trying to bring him to justice. But also because of his track record of using the DoJ, one could say weaponizing it, for his own benefit or against his perceived enemies. Like this...........

ā€˜Really shocking': Trumpā€™s meddling in Stone case stuns Washington

President Donald Trumpā€™s post-impeachment acquittal behavior is casting a chill in Washington, with Attorney General William Barr emerging as a key ally in the presidentā€™s quest for vengeance against the law enforcement and national security establishment that initiated the Russia and Ukraine investigations.

In perhaps the most tumultuous day yet for the Justice Department under Trump, four top prosecutors withdrew on Tuesday from a case involving the presidentā€™s longtime friend Roger Stone after senior department officials overrode their sentencing recommendationā€”a backpedaling that DOJ veterans and legal experts suspect was influenced by Trumpā€™s own displeasure with the prosecutorsā€™ judgment.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/12/trump-roger-stone-justice-department-114684

Past, as they say, is prologue.
 
This is nothing more than, what is good for congress is not good for the public.

Congress had it's own hush money fund to pay off the lovers of all the congressman. Now, suddenly, when it comes to Trump, what Congress did for decades is no longer legal?

More politics, weaponizing the Courts, Law, against political enemies. Read it for yourself, here is one example of Congress using money to keep sexual harassment and their mistresses, quiet.

Since 1997, the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights has paid out $18.2 million to settle 291 cases of workplace disputes for Congress, the Capitol Police, the Architect of the Capitol, and the Library of Congress.

When news first broke of the settlement account, Congress was accused of having a veritable #MeToo slush fund to secretly pay off victims of sexual harassment. Reports surfaced that then-Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) negotiated a secret settlement with a female staffer who accused him of sexual misconduct, and the 88-year-old quickly resigned from Congress.
 
Here is another nice story, showing congress using Non-disclosure Agreements. How is this legal but if Trump uses them they are not legal?

ForFor unpaid interns on Capitol Hill, secrecy is so much a part of the job that on their first day, many are required to sign sweeping nondisclosure agreements.

Employment lawyers reviewed two Hill NDAs obtained by Vox and said they are written in a way that could discourage interns from speaking up about anything, potentially protecting members of Congress and their staff even in cases of harassment or abuse.
 
This is nothing more than, what is good for congress is not good for the public.
Whataboutism noted.

ā€œWith Bill Barr, on an amazing number of occasions ā€¦ you can be almost 100 percent certain that thereā€™s something improper going on,ā€ said Donald Ayer, the former deputy attorney general in the George H.W. Bush administration.

The president has only inflamed such suspicions, congratulating Barr on Wednesday for intervening in Stoneā€™s case and teeing off hours later on the prosecutors, calling them ā€œMueller peopleā€ who treated Stone ā€œvery badly.ā€
 
Whataboutism noted.

ā€œWith Bill Barr, on an amazing number of occasions ā€¦ you can be almost 100 percent certain that thereā€™s something improper going on,ā€ said Donald Ayer, the former deputy attorney general in the George H.W. Bush administration.

The president has only inflamed such suspicions, congratulating Barr on Wednesday for intervening in Stoneā€™s case and teeing off hours later on the prosecutors, calling them ā€œMueller peopleā€ who treated Stone ā€œvery badly.ā€

Full Blown Hypocrisy
 
Because after all.......

Trump makes a desperate attempt to downplay illegal payments to women

President Donald Trump began his week by trying to downplay illegal hush payments to women made late in the 2016 presidential campaign ā€” ones that federal prosecutors now say he directed and coordinated ā€” as a mere ā€œsimple private transaction.ā€
Trump makes a desperate attempt to downplay illegal payments to women

However............

Inside Barrā€™s Effort to Undermine Prosecutors in N.Y.

Shortly after he became attorney general last year, William P. Barr set out to challenge a signature criminal case that touched President Trumpā€™s inner circle directly, and even the presidentā€™s own actions: the prosecution of Michael D. Cohen, Mr. Trumpā€™s longtime fixer.

The debate between Mr. Barr and the federal prosecutors who brought the case against Mr. Cohen was one of the first signs of a tense relationship that culminated last weekend in the abrupt ouster of Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States attorney in Manhattan. It also foreshadowed Mr. Barrā€™s intervention in the prosecutions of other associates of Mr. Trump.

By the time Mr. Barr was sworn into office in February, Mr. Cohen, who had paid hush money to an adult film star who said she had an affair with Mr. Trump, had already pleaded guilty and was set to begin a three-year prison sentence, all of which embarrassed and angered the president.

But Mr. Barr spent weeks in the spring of 2019 questioning the prosecutors over their decision to charge Mr. Cohen with violating campaign finance laws, according to people briefed on the matter.

Inside Barrā€™s Effort to Undermine Prosecutors in N.Y. (Published 2020)

Eventually, Billy the Bagman pushed to have the charges against Cohen dropped. From Berman's book..........."While Cohen had pleaded guilty, our office continued to pursue investigations related to other possible campaign finance violations. When Barr took over in Feb. of 2019, he not only tried to kill the ongoing investigations but...incredibly...suggested that Cohen's conviction on campaign finance charges be reversed."

Why?

Because Individual 1 was implicated in the same illegal campaign finance violations Cohen had plead guilty to.

Book: The DOJ almost implicated Trump more directly in a crime

It was a shocking enough document as it was. Donald Trumpā€™s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, had pleaded guilty to illegally concealing hush money paid to two women who were accusing Trump of extramarital affairs. The 2018 charging document implicated Trump, named as ā€œIndividual-1,ā€ notably by saying he attended a meeting about how he might quash any negative stories about his relationships.

And it might have implicated Trump even further, then-U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman now says ā€” were it not for the kind of politically tinged meddling that he says was endemic in the Trump Justice Department.

The New York Times last week briefly noted that Bermanā€™s new book alleges that a Justice Department official tried to get references to Trump removed from the Cohen charging document. And now that the book is out, we have Bermanā€™s fuller account of the events.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...-almost-implicated-trump-more-directly-crime/

Much has been made by people like me about how ugly things could get with respect to the DoJ should Trump be re-elected. In part based on what kind of retribution he has promised against those involved in trying to bring him to justice. But also because of his track record of using the DoJ, one could say weaponizing it, for his own benefit or against his perceived enemies. Like this...........

ā€˜Really shocking': Trumpā€™s meddling in Stone case stuns Washington

President Donald Trumpā€™s post-impeachment acquittal behavior is casting a chill in Washington, with Attorney General William Barr emerging as a key ally in the presidentā€™s quest for vengeance against the law enforcement and national security establishment that initiated the Russia and Ukraine investigations.

In perhaps the most tumultuous day yet for the Justice Department under Trump, four top prosecutors withdrew on Tuesday from a case involving the presidentā€™s longtime friend Roger Stone after senior department officials overrode their sentencing recommendationā€”a backpedaling that DOJ veterans and legal experts suspect was influenced by Trumpā€™s own displeasure with the prosecutorsā€™ judgment.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/12/trump-roger-stone-justice-department-114684

Past, as they say, is prologue.
IMG_2007.jpeg
 
Here is another nice story, showing congress using Non-disclosure Agreements. How is this legal but if Trump uses them they are not legal?

"While Cohen had pleaded guilty, our office continued to pursue investigations related to other possible campaign finance violations. When Barr took over in Feb. of 2019, he not only tried to kill the ongoing investigations but...incredibly...suggested that Cohen's conviction on campaign finance charges be reversed."

Individual 1's AG interfered with the Cohen conviction so the whole sordid matter wouldn't look as bad for Trump. Try as you might to find one there is no equivalence to that.
 
You are aware that breaking campaign finance laws would be a federal crime and not one adjudicated in state court.
Read it, nitwit.

 
Because after all.......

Trump makes a desperate attempt to downplay illegal payments to women

President Donald Trump began his week by trying to downplay illegal hush payments to women made late in the 2016 presidential campaign ā€” ones that federal prosecutors now say he directed and coordinated ā€” as a mere ā€œsimple private transaction.ā€
Trump makes a desperate attempt to downplay illegal payments to women

However............

Inside Barrā€™s Effort to Undermine Prosecutors in N.Y.

Shortly after he became attorney general last year, William P. Barr set out to challenge a signature criminal case that touched President Trumpā€™s inner circle directly, and even the presidentā€™s own actions: the prosecution of Michael D. Cohen, Mr. Trumpā€™s longtime fixer.

The debate between Mr. Barr and the federal prosecutors who brought the case against Mr. Cohen was one of the first signs of a tense relationship that culminated last weekend in the abrupt ouster of Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States attorney in Manhattan. It also foreshadowed Mr. Barrā€™s intervention in the prosecutions of other associates of Mr. Trump.

By the time Mr. Barr was sworn into office in February, Mr. Cohen, who had paid hush money to an adult film star who said she had an affair with Mr. Trump, had already pleaded guilty and was set to begin a three-year prison sentence, all of which embarrassed and angered the president.

But Mr. Barr spent weeks in the spring of 2019 questioning the prosecutors over their decision to charge Mr. Cohen with violating campaign finance laws, according to people briefed on the matter.

Inside Barrā€™s Effort to Undermine Prosecutors in N.Y. (Published 2020)

Eventually, Billy the Bagman pushed to have the charges against Cohen dropped. From Berman's book..........."While Cohen had pleaded guilty, our office continued to pursue investigations related to other possible campaign finance violations. When Barr took over in Feb. of 2019, he not only tried to kill the ongoing investigations but...incredibly...suggested that Cohen's conviction on campaign finance charges be reversed."

Why?

Because Individual 1 was implicated in the same illegal campaign finance violations Cohen had plead guilty to.

Book: The DOJ almost implicated Trump more directly in a crime

It was a shocking enough document as it was. Donald Trumpā€™s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, had pleaded guilty to illegally concealing hush money paid to two women who were accusing Trump of extramarital affairs. The 2018 charging document implicated Trump, named as ā€œIndividual-1,ā€ notably by saying he attended a meeting about how he might quash any negative stories about his relationships.

And it might have implicated Trump even further, then-U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman now says ā€” were it not for the kind of politically tinged meddling that he says was endemic in the Trump Justice Department.

The New York Times last week briefly noted that Bermanā€™s new book alleges that a Justice Department official tried to get references to Trump removed from the Cohen charging document. And now that the book is out, we have Bermanā€™s fuller account of the events.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...-almost-implicated-trump-more-directly-crime/

Much has been made by people like me about how ugly things could get with respect to the DoJ should Trump be re-elected. In part based on what kind of retribution he has promised against those involved in trying to bring him to justice. But also because of his track record of using the DoJ, one could say weaponizing it, for his own benefit or against his perceived enemies. Like this...........

ā€˜Really shocking': Trumpā€™s meddling in Stone case stuns Washington

President Donald Trumpā€™s post-impeachment acquittal behavior is casting a chill in Washington, with Attorney General William Barr emerging as a key ally in the presidentā€™s quest for vengeance against the law enforcement and national security establishment that initiated the Russia and Ukraine investigations.

In perhaps the most tumultuous day yet for the Justice Department under Trump, four top prosecutors withdrew on Tuesday from a case involving the presidentā€™s longtime friend Roger Stone after senior department officials overrode their sentencing recommendationā€”a backpedaling that DOJ veterans and legal experts suspect was influenced by Trumpā€™s own displeasure with the prosecutorsā€™ judgment.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/12/trump-roger-stone-justice-department-114684

Past, as they say, is prologue.
šŸ„ØšŸ„ØšŸ„ØšŸ„ØšŸ„ØšŸ„ØšŸ„ØšŸ„ØšŸ„ØšŸ„ØšŸ„ØšŸ„ØšŸ„Ø
 
Trumpleton's are stuffing these story lines about Trump and Barr's corruption down the memory hole much faster than I can remind them of them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top