Is this worthy of the user being banned by FaceBook?

[Dr Grump]

I have a Facebook account that I haven't logged into for a couple years. I just posted the same picture and was told this:

Your post goes against our Community Standards on nudity or sexual activity

No one else can see your post.
Our standards apply globally and are based on our community

How we make decisions

We use the same Community Standards around the world for everyone on Facebook.

We use either technology or a review team to remove anything that doesn’t follow our standards as quickly as possible.

Our review team works in many languages to make sure our standards are applied consistently.

The rules on nudity or sexual activity

We have one set of standards because we want everyone on Facebook to feel welcome.
Nudity or sexual content includes:

• • Nudity showing genitals
• • Sexual activity
• • Female nipples (except in the context of breastfeeding, after-birth moments, health and acts of protest)
• • Sexually explicit language

So I deleted my Facebook account. Fuck them.

Good job. Once less retard posting on the platform.

 

[toobfreak]

The user submitted this montage of Biden kissing minors.
This was what Facebook did to the submitter.
This was what they said had sexual activity...
Now do you see how the election of Biden is the most gigantic fraud!
When even Facebook protects Biden!

So then is FB admitting and calling mere PICTURES of our president elect in his normal daily habits kiddy porn with an old geezer?!

I mean, those aren't doctored pictures! That's just Joe!

And did they ever ban people for showing Trump with his daughter claiming he was groping her or something, where they WERE doctored pictures and/or false claims?

I'll say it again: MILLIONS of people ought to trigger FB and Twitter to ban them all with Biden stuff. Let them work 24/7 for weeks trying to keep up with the workload.

Good thing I never joined these places: no matter what my politics, I'd leave on principle alone.

 

[progressive hunter]

I have a Facebook account that I haven't logged into for a couple years. I just posted the same picture and was told this:

Your post goes against our Community Standards on nudity or sexual activity

No one else can see your post.
Our standards apply globally and are based on our community

How we make decisions

We use the same Community Standards around the world for everyone on Facebook.

We use either technology or a review team to remove anything that doesn’t follow our standards as quickly as possible.

Our review team works in many languages to make sure our standards are applied consistently.

The rules on nudity or sexual activity

We have one set of standards because we want everyone on Facebook to feel welcome.
Nudity or sexual content includes:

• • Nudity showing genitals
• • Sexual activity
• • Female nipples (except in the context of breastfeeding, after-birth moments, health and acts of protest)
• • Sexually explicit language

So I deleted my Facebook account. Fuck them.

why would you post pictures of children being sexually assaulted????

If the sexual predator was some asshole whose crackhead son fucked his sister in law and his niece, I'd post pictures all over the place.

I am talking about the children in the picture,, I am sure you dont want those children living out their lives with pictures of them being abused all over the internet,,

They're probably children of Democrats, who will grow up to be Democrats, pedophiles, transsexuals, and other faggots.

At this point, screw them, unless they grow up and speak out against that sexual predator in which case, God bless 'em.

so fuck the children,,, got it,,,

You'd rather some sick pervert's deviancy was covered up, and nobody knew about it? Honestly, dude: That's shit that needs to come out in the open.

when did I say anything about that???

just fuzz out the childrens faces and treat it like what it is,,, evidence of sexual abuse to a minor,,,

 

[Dr Grump]

Good thing I never joined these places: no matter what my politics, I'd leave on principle alone.

What? Those principles being it's okay to slander and libel people? Sounds like yet another retard not on the platform. All good...I love it when Facebook cleans the shit from the screen.

 

[healthmyths]

For life. Because, 1) It's slander 2) It's trolling.
[/QUOTE]
Slander? How there is nothing Slanderous. Is Biden groping Yes. He's smelling the girl's hair. Kissing on the lips. It is a picture!
2) Trolling? FACTS which evidently you don't seem to believe..
An Internet troll is a member of an online social community who deliberately tries to disrupt, attack, offend or generally cause trouble within the community by posting certain comments, photos, videos, GIFs or some other form of online content.

Internet Trolls and the Many Ways They Try to Ruin Your Day

Internet trolls can be dangerous but most are hilariously similar. Here are just 10 of the most common types you'll see online.

www.lifewire.com

Prove the Facebook poster is a member of an group intending to disrupt,attack... etc.
By your making those statements YOU ARE TrOLLING!

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

For life. Because, 1) It's slander 2) It's trolling.

Slander? How there is nothing Slanderous. Is Biden groping Yes. He's smelling the girl's hair. Kissing on the lips. It is a picture!
2) Trolling? FACTS which evidently you don't seem to believe..
An Internet troll is a member of an online social community who deliberately tries to disrupt, attack, offend or generally cause trouble within the community by posting certain comments, photos, videos, GIFs or some other form of online content.

Internet Trolls and the Many Ways They Try to Ruin Your Day

Internet trolls can be dangerous but most are hilariously similar. Here are just 10 of the most common types you'll see online.

www.lifewire.com

Prove the Facebook poster is a member of an group intending to disrupt,attack... etc.
By your making those statements YOU ARE TrOLLING!

[/QUOTE]

I get that you want to believe this alt-right bullshit but quite frankly, it just makes you look weak.
Facebook is a private company. They have a TOS. Violate it and get banned.
I sincerely don't care about some asshole's trolling post.

 

[healthmyths]

Good thing I never joined these places: no matter what my politics, I'd leave on principle alone.

What? Those principles being it's okay to slander and libel people? Sounds like yet another retard not on the platform. All good...I love it when Facebook cleans the shit from the screen.

How are the pictures "slander"? These are the facts. Biden nuzzles minors. He kisses minors. He sniffs hair. Fondles bodies. All are pictured there.
What is the problem with stating that? Not slanderous when the proof is in the pictures!

 

[toobfreak]

Good thing I never joined these places: no matter what my politics, I'd leave on principle alone.

What? Those principles being it's okay to slander and libel people? Sounds like yet another retard not on the platform. All good...I love it when Facebook cleans the shit from the screen.

Slander and Libel Joe by showing him kissing and fondling children? Do you even know what slander and libel are, you imbecile?

Meantime I bet they allowed a MILLION smears and sexual inuendo agtainst Trump. Drop dead.

 

[JGalt]

For life. Because, 1) It's slander 2) It's trolling.

Slander? How there is nothing Slanderous. Is Biden groping Yes. He's smelling the girl's hair. Kissing on the lips. It is a picture!
2) Trolling? FACTS which evidently you don't seem to believe..
An Internet troll is a member of an online social community who deliberately tries to disrupt, attack, offend or generally cause trouble within the community by posting certain comments, photos, videos, GIFs or some other form of online content.

Internet Trolls and the Many Ways They Try to Ruin Your Day

Internet trolls can be dangerous but most are hilariously similar. Here are just 10 of the most common types you'll see online.

www.lifewire.com

Prove the Facebook poster is a member of an group intending to disrupt,attack... etc.
By your making those statements YOU ARE TrOLLING!

I get that you want to believe this alt-right bullshit but quite frankly, it just makes you look weak.
Facebook is a private company. They have a TOS. Violate it and get banned.
I sincerely don't care about some asshole's trolling post.
[/QUOTE]

Private company or not, they are a publisher, and should be regulated by the federal government. And lose their financial status if they don't conform.

 

[BlueGin]

Good thing I never joined these places: no matter what my politics, I'd leave on principle alone.

What? Those principles being it's okay to slander and libel people? Sounds like yet another retard not on the platform. All good...I love it when Facebook cleans the shit from the screen.

FB said it was sexual. Not slander.

 

[JGalt]

Good thing I never joined these places: no matter what my politics, I'd leave on principle alone.

What? Those principles being it's okay to slander and libel people? Sounds like yet another retard not on the platform. All good...I love it when Facebook cleans the shit from the screen.

FB said it was sexual. Not slander.

Thank you.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

facebook is admitting that Biden is a pedocreep

 

[JGalt]

facebook is admitting that Biden is a pedocreep

Even worse, they're trying to hide the fact that he's a pedophile. That's illegal.

 

[OldLady]

I'm an old man who has never been to Facebook.

I hear that it is a nice place for family members to keep in touch.

I guess that people nowadays also use it for political commentary.

I kind of agree with Facebook: The photo montage was meant to imply that our next President is a [self-censored]. I can understand why Facebook felt that it was dirty pool.

I know one thing for sure: Starting on January 21, the Biden administration will start clamping down on the First Amendment. Facebook or no Facebook, people will find fewer platforms to express unpopular or politically incorrect views about race, religion, gender, sexuality, etc. Well-meaning bureaucrats will explain that we must do everything possible to maintain domestic tranquility as this country continues its dizzying demographic change.

I will be glad, too.

 

[JGalt]

I'm an old man who has never been to Facebook.

I hear that it is a nice place for family members to keep in touch.

I guess that people nowadays also use it for political commentary.

I kind of agree with Facebook: The photo montage was meant to imply that our next President is a [self-censored]. I can understand why Facebook felt that it was dirty pool.

I know one thing for sure: Starting on January 21, the Biden administration will start clamping down on the First Amendment. Facebook or no Facebook, people will find fewer platforms to express unpopular or politically incorrect views about race, religion, gender, sexuality, etc. Well-meaning bureaucrats will explain that we must do everything possible to maintain domestic tranquility as this country continues its dizzying demographic change.

I will be glad, too.

Why would you be glad? If I muzzled you by blocking you, so I never again read a single word you printed, you would like that? Because in effect, that's what I would be doing to you: Silencing you. Revoking and nullifying your First Amendment right to free speech.

Sure, you could say all you wanted to and someone would hear you, but I wouldn't. You could type away furiously, yell, scream, and cry, but I wouldn't hear a word you said.

To paraphrase an old question, If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it fall, it makes no sound.

 

[OldLady]

I'm an old man who has never been to Facebook.

I hear that it is a nice place for family members to keep in touch.

I guess that people nowadays also use it for political commentary.

I kind of agree with Facebook: The photo montage was meant to imply that our next President is a [self-censored]. I can understand why Facebook felt that it was dirty pool.

I know one thing for sure: Starting on January 21, the Biden administration will start clamping down on the First Amendment. Facebook or no Facebook, people will find fewer platforms to express unpopular or politically incorrect views about race, religion, gender, sexuality, etc. Well-meaning bureaucrats will explain that we must do everything possible to maintain domestic tranquility as this country continues its dizzying demographic change.

I will be glad, too.

Why would you be glad? If I muzzled you by blocking you, so I never again read a single word you printed, you would like that? Because in effect, that's what I would be doing to you: Silencing you.

If I go around making memes that falsely accuse someone of being a pedophile, I deserve to be silenced.

 

[PredFan]

 

[PredFan]

It's funny how the left is in here whining about slander. If that had been Trump instead of Groping joe, those pictures would be on TVs in every living room across the country.

 

[progressive hunter]

I'm an old man who has never been to Facebook.

I hear that it is a nice place for family members to keep in touch.

I guess that people nowadays also use it for political commentary.

I kind of agree with Facebook: The photo montage was meant to imply that our next President is a [self-censored]. I can understand why Facebook felt that it was dirty pool.

I know one thing for sure: Starting on January 21, the Biden administration will start clamping down on the First Amendment. Facebook or no Facebook, people will find fewer platforms to express unpopular or politically incorrect views about race, religion, gender, sexuality, etc. Well-meaning bureaucrats will explain that we must do everything possible to maintain domestic tranquility as this country continues its dizzying demographic change.

I will be glad, too.

Why would you be glad? If I muzzled you by blocking you, so I never again read a single word you printed, you would like that? Because in effect, that's what I would be doing to you: Silencing you.

If I go around making memes that falsely accuse someone of being a pedophile, I deserve to be silenced.

whats false about it??? the pictures are right there,,,

 

[JGalt]

I'm an old man who has never been to Facebook.

I hear that it is a nice place for family members to keep in touch.

I guess that people nowadays also use it for political commentary.

I kind of agree with Facebook: The photo montage was meant to imply that our next President is a [self-censored]. I can understand why Facebook felt that it was dirty pool.

I know one thing for sure: Starting on January 21, the Biden administration will start clamping down on the First Amendment. Facebook or no Facebook, people will find fewer platforms to express unpopular or politically incorrect views about race, religion, gender, sexuality, etc. Well-meaning bureaucrats will explain that we must do everything possible to maintain domestic tranquility as this country continues its dizzying demographic change.

I will be glad, too.

Why would you be glad? If I muzzled you by blocking you, so I never again read a single word you printed, you would like that? Because in effect, that's what I would be doing to you: Silencing you.

If I go around making memes that falsely accuse someone of being a pedophile, I deserve to be silenced.

How "false" was anything depicted in the image? Was is Photoshopped with out of context characters placed in the image?

Let me ask you this: If I did the same to any of the children in your immediate family, how would you react? Take your time with your answer and choose wisely, if you have the capacity to do that...