- Thread starter
- #121
You did not listen to him. HE said he had no idea. But Reagan was the rare president who took blame even when he did nothing wrong. Biden or Obama never did that.Reagan admitted it himself, so yer denial is worthless.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You did not listen to him. HE said he had no idea. But Reagan was the rare president who took blame even when he did nothing wrong. Biden or Obama never did that.Reagan admitted it himself, so yer denial is worthless.
In his 1987 State of the Union address and subsequent speeches, Reagan acknowledged that his administration traded arms for hostages, a practice he had previously denied, and admitted the initiative "deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages"You did not listen to him. HE said he had no idea. But Reagan was the rare president who took blame even when he did nothing wrong. Biden or Obama never did that.
Israel provided the US Missiles for the sale and the profits were illegally diverted to support the Contra-Terrorists in Costa Rica.
He didn't remember approving it, but he accepted the evidence that he did.
He denied it since he had no idea at all about this. Arms went to Iran 2 times, not the one time you chatter your ass off about.In his 1987 State of the Union address and subsequent speeches, Reagan acknowledged that his administration traded arms for hostages, a practice he had previously denied, and admitted the initiative "deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages"
All we got out of Reagan was increased debt...and illegal moves.
No loyal Democrat so far never answered the question about Bush.What did GHWB do to cause the Soviets to collapse? Reagan went after them. And they knew he could out military them. So what did G Bush do against the Soviets?
Commentators who worked on the policy (including academics advising the administration) point to specific legislative choices and the Budget Enforcement Act rules that constrained discretionary spending, while other analysts stress that the late 1990s boom — driven by technology investment and a rising labor market — produced revenue growth that made surpluses achievable without dramatic cuts to major entitlement programs <a href="A Harvard professor who helped Bill Clinton balance the budget in the 1990s says Kevin McCarthy will struggle to keep that promise | Fortune" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">[3]</a> <a href="A Surplus, If We Can Keep It: How the Federal Budget Surplus Happened | Brookings" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">[4]</a>.The economy during Bill Clinton's presidency (1993–2001) experienced the longest economic expansion in U.S. history at the time, characterized by high growth, low unemployment, and a shift from large deficits to significant budget surpluses. Key successes included 22.7 million new jobs, low inflation, rising incomes, and the first balanced federal budget since 1969
Don't take my word for it.No that is not correct. The so-called missiles were like rocket launchers and Israel believing it was a favor to be returned, sent the launchers to Iran. No launchers or missies were sent to the Contras and that would happen when the Saudis supplied arms to the Contras.
I have not yet heard from any Democrat that they subscribe to the Budgets of the USA.
I no longer subscribe to the budget of the USA however when Bill Clinton was president I did, he is credited for a surplus when his budget sent and approved by Congress never said one would happen.
So how did he get a surplus.
Dotcoms were in vogue. The public wanted to get rich. They were pouring money into operations where online you bought groceries and went to the store to pick them up. A pre-Amazon in fact. Now it is common to get groceries picked for us and delivered to our homes. I do it all the time. But no budget agreed to by Clinton called for a balanced budget nor a surplus HE happened to be lucky.
Commentators who worked on the policy (including academics advising the administration) point to specific legislative choices and the Budget Enforcement Act rules that constrained discretionary spending, while other analysts stress that the late 1990s boom — driven by technology investment and a rising labor market — produced revenue growth that made surpluses achievable without dramatic cuts to major entitlement programs <a href="A Harvard professor who helped Bill Clinton balance the budget in the 1990s says Kevin McCarthy will struggle to keep that promise | Fortune" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">[3]</a> <a href="A Surplus, If We Can Keep It: How the Federal Budget Surplus Happened | Brookings" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">[4]</a>.
WrongIt just would have taken one panicking Wing Commander to start World War III
Again, sensible people knew what I meant.
Not you.
Nope they were not terrorists.The afghani mujahideen.
Yea. Of course, the CIA investigated itself lol, but still found some bad stuff.
It really is crazy, isnt it?Come on now... you're destroying the romanticized fairy tale version of Reagan for them.![]()
Yea. Bin Laden, a great man.Nope they were not terrorists.
None of that suggests reagan knew

Reagan is hated by Democrats especially the Atheists. JoeB131 can explain it.
Well clearly you truly support Muslims. Apparently your being an atheist fell off the cliff.
This thread is about establishing a metric for leaders in the court of public opinion Moon......This thread is not about anyone but Ronny.
He came later they were fighting the soviets.Yea. Bin Laden, a great man.
They rebelled against the elected govt of afghanistan to start an islamic state. He knew, I mean, thats WHY all the groups were created. For an Islamic state.
He came in 84. In 86 Reagan started sending them advanced weapons like stinger missiles. In 86 Reagan increased their financial aid from 20m yearly, to almost 700m.He came later they were fighting the soviets.
They were not terrorists then they were fighting our enemyHe came in 84. In 86 Reagan started sending them advanced weapons like stinger missiles. In 86 Reagan increased their financial aid from 20m yearly, to almost 700m.
They were fighting against their elected government to instill an islamic regime.They were not terrorists then they were fighting our enemy